Atty. John Matthew Ennis
Is this you? Claim this profile →John Matthew Ennis is a lawyer practicing commercial, adverse possession, ancillary probate and 58 other areas of law. John received a B.B.A. degree from Gonzaga University in 1972, and has been licensed for 50 years.
About
John Matthew Ennis is a lawyer practicing commercial, adverse possession, ancillary probate and 58 other areas of law. John received a B.B.A. degree from Gonzaga University in 1972, and has been licensed for 50 years. John practices at Hager & Ennis in Fircrest, WA.
Practice Areas
Adverse Possession
Ancillary Probate
Commercial
Boundary Disputes
Business
Civil Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Common Interest Community Law
Community Association Law
Conveyancing
Corporate
Easements
Estate Planning
Family
Homeowners Association Law
Inheritance
International Real Estate
Land Acquisitions
Land Sales
Land Trusts
Living Wills
Missing Heir Searches
Probate
Probate Taxation
Quiet Title
Real Estate
Real Estate Acquisitions
Real Estate Arbitration
Real Estate Banking Law
Real Estate Bankruptcy
Real Estate Contracts
Real Estate Development
Real Estate Finance
Real Estate Investment
Real Estate Joint Ventures
Real Estate Leasing
Real Estate Litigation
Real Estate Mediation
Real Estate Partnerships
Real Estate Restructuring
Real Estate Sales
Real Estate Secured Lending
Real Estate Settlements
Real Estate Title Examination
Real Estate Valuation
Real Estate Workouts
Real Property
Real Property Acquisitions
Real Property Development
Real Property Finance
Residential Real Estate
Residential Real Estate Acquisitions
Residential Real Estate Development
Residential Real Estate Finance
Residential Real Estate Foreclosure
Residential Real Estate Sales
Right Of Way Easements
Successions
Waterfront Development
Wills
Wills & Living Wills
Education
J.D.
Gonzaga University
- 1975
B.B.A.
Gonzaga University
- 1972
Awards
AV Preeminent
Bar Admissions
Washington
Admitted: 1976
U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
Admitted: 1981
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Admitted: 1982
Reviews
5.0
1 Review
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.
No reviews yet.