Av. Floyd Drexel Feeling

Av. Floyd Drexel Feeling

Floyd Drexel Feeling is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, itc section 337, patent litigation and 2 other areas of law. Floyd received a B.S. degree from University of Pennsylvania in 1984, and has been licensed for 31 years.

Cleveland Cleveland 31 Yıl Deneyim 31 yıl
Call (216) 930-5916 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Floyd Drexel Feeling at a glance

Floyd Drexel Feeling is an Of Counsel based in Cleveland, Ohio, practicing at Jones Day. They have 31+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 1995. Their practice focuses on patent and ip. Admitted to practice in Ohio U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Ci (1995). Educated at The Ohio State University (J.D., 1995) and University of Pennsylvania (B.S. Wright, 1984). Recognitions include Peer Reviewed. Serands clients in Cleveland, OH and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

Hakkında

  • Floyd Drexel Feeling is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, itc section 337, patent litigation and 2 other areas of law
  • Floyd received a B.S. degree from University of Pennsylvania in 1984, and has been licensed for 31 years
  • Floyd practices at Jones Day in Cleveland, OH

Practice Areas Explained

Floyd Drexel Feeling's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Floyd Drexel Feeling handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Patent Law

Floyd Drexel Feeling is one of 20,749 patent attorneys indexed nationally. Browse patent attorneys in Ohio →

Intellectual Property

IP attorneys protect inventions, brands, and creative work through patent prosecution, trademark registration, copyright, and trade-secret enforcement.

Floyd Drexel Feeling is one of 106,079 ip attorneys indexed nationally. Browse ip attorneys in Ohio →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in Ohio

Practicing law in Ohio. Legal matters in Ohio are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Cleveland are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Ohio state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Ohio brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Ohio courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional Ohio attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Cleveland or all attorneys in Ohio.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Floyd Drexel Feeling

Where is Floyd Drexel Feeling's law office located?
Floyd Drexel Feeling's law practice is located in Cleveland, Ohio. The firm is Jones Day. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Floyd Drexel Feeling handle?
Floyd Drexel Feeling focuses on patent, ip. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in Ohio.
How long has Floyd Drexel Feeling practiced law?
Floyd Drexel Feeling has 31+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 1995.
Where did Floyd Drexel Feeling go to law school?
Floyd Drexel Feeling earned their education at (J.D., 1995); (B.S. Wright, 1984).
How can I contact Floyd Drexel Feeling for a consultation?
You can contact Floyd Drexel Feeling directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
What awards or recognition has Floyd Drexel Feeling received?
Floyd Drexel Feeling's notable recognition includes: Peer Reviewed.

Eğitim

J.D.
The Ohio State University
- 1995
B.S. Wright
University of Pennsylvania
- 1984

Ödüller

Peer Reviewed

Bar Admissions

Ohio U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Ci
Admitted: 1995

Değerlendirmeler

5.0
1 Değerlendirme
5 0
4 0
3 0
2 0
1 0
Bu değerlendirmeler platform kullanıcılarına aittir; avukatın reklamı veya tanıtımı niteliği taşımaz. Görüşler yalnızca bilgilendirme amacıyla yayımlanmaktadır.

Henüz değerlendirme yapılmamış.