Atty. Richard Eldon Davis
Richard represents clients in litigation, trials, appeals, investigations, and regulatory enforcement actions-most frequently (but not exclusively) in the following types of matters: • Environmental (including natural resources, agricultural, land use, and chemical products) • Alleged violations of federal and state laws and local ordinances • State common law torts • Commercial • False Claims Act (healthcare. financial, procurement, and defense contracting fraud) • Business torts (including fraud, interference, defamation, unfair competition, and restraint of trade) • Breach of contract • Rac
Commercial Disputes & More Attorney · Serving Birmingham, AL
Profile Summary
About Richard Eldon Davis at a Glance
Richard Eldon Davis is a Partner based in Birmingham, Alabama, practicing at Starnes Davis Florie Llp. Their practice focuses on personal injury, criminal defense, business, zoning, and white collar. Educated at Cumberland School of Law of Samford University (J.D., 1989) and Auburn University (B.A. The, 1983). Recognitions include AV Preeminent. Active member of Community Involvement • Birmingham Bar Association Law Day Co-Chair 2025 • Alabama State Bar Environmental Law Section Executive Committee • Federal Bar Association • National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Serves clients in Birmingham, AL and the surrounding metropolitan area.
Get Legal Help from Richard Eldon Davis in Birmingham
Sign up free and choose one of the two methods below.
Have a legal question? Sign up free, submit it through the Ask the Attorney module and receive a focused answer from a specialist.
- Free to ask a question
- Answers from specialist attorneys
- Optional private / anonymous question
Request an online video meeting or an in-person consultation at the attorney's office. Pick a time that works for you and share the details securely.
- Online video meeting
- In-person at the attorney's office
- Secure messaging and payment
About Richard Eldon Davis
- Richard represents clients in litigation, trials, appeals, investigations, and regulatory enforcement actions-most frequently (but not exclusively) in the following types of matters: • Environmental (including natural resources, agricultural, land use, and chemical products) • Alleged violations of federal and state laws and local ordinances • State common law torts • Commercial • False Claims Act (healthcare. financial, procurement, and defense contracting fraud) • Business torts (including fraud, interference, defamation, unfair competition, and restraint of trade) • Breach of contract • Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act Professional Recognition •AV-Rated, Martindale-Hubbell •Senior fellow, Litigation Counsel of America Trial Lawyer Honorary •Top Leading Litigator by Chambers USA •Best Lawyers in America -Litigation-Environmental, Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, and Natural Resources
- In addition, Best Lawyers in America has named Richard Davis the “Birmingham Natural Resources Law Lawyer of the Year” for 2017, 2019, 2021, and 2024. •Mid-South Super Lawyers •Chair, Birmingham Bar Association Federal Practice Section (2015-2016) •Chair, Alabama State Bar Environmental Law Section (2010-2011) •Editor-in-Chief, Cumberland Law Review (1988-1989) •Samford University Cumberland School of Law “Celebrate Pro Bono 2015”Alumni Honoree Highlights •Environmental/chemical products liability litigation: Representing commercial solvent distributor and corporate affiliates in two state court lawsuits by two local water utilities for alleged pollution of ground water source by PFAS. • Eminent domain: Representing landowner in case of potential condemnation (“taking”) by public utility company of as-yet undetermined acreage through the central part of over a thousand acres of valuable land that will have a dramatic adverse effect on the value and use of client’s property. •Healthcare fraud investigation: Representing chiropractor and practice entity (franchisee) in parallel criminal and civil investigation of issues regarding franchisor company, its franchisees, an accounts receivable recovery company, billing, and treatment of patients under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) by the USDOJ, DoL OIG, USPS, and FBI. • Environmental, natural resources, and land use litigation: Representing plaintiff agricultural business entities and residential landowners in lawsuit to enjoin construction and operation of proposed quarry in Chambers County, Alabama that will adversely impact and interfere with the landowners’ water rights, use and enjoyment of their homes and farmlands, cattle and horses, commercial cow-calf and beef production operations, equestrian boarding and sporting facilities, equine breeding business, and individual health and safety. • Healthcare fraud investigation: Representing publicly traded holding company and its practice management subsidiaries in False Claims Act investigation regarding over $10,000,000 in alleged improper billing of federal programs for administration of IV lidocaine by managed regenerative medicine centers. • False Claims Act/Anti-Kickback investigation: Representing orthopedic surgeon in investigation by USDOJ for alleged illegal remuneration from medical device companies in conjunction with use of bone-filled allograft product. • False Claims Act/retaliatory discharge litigation: Defending asphalt and construction companies against allegations of fraud and whistleblower retaliation pertaining to paving of a highway and an airfield
- obtained four individual defendants and all fraud claims
- The case is currently stayed in the trial court pending the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in U.S. ex rel
- Zafirov v
- Florida Medical Associates, LLC regarding the constitutionality of the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act with the retaliatory discharge claim potentially remaining for trial. • Environmental investigation and litigation:Defending two privately held companies in enforcement actions-both as potentially responsible parties in an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cost recovery investigation arising from the release of allegedly hazardous substances as the result of vandals shooting holes in an aboveground storage tank at an abandoned recycling facility on the Chattahoochee River and one as a defendant in an Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) enforcement lawsuit for improper storage of allegedly hazardous waste. • False Claims Act/Anti-Kickback litigation: Negotiated settlement and dismissal of claims against individual client in case brought by the USDOJ against multiple defendants in relation to an alleged commission-based health care referral scheme targeting federal healthcare programs, including TRICARE, and in which judgment of $31,039,134.82 was entered against the last remaining defendant. • Environmental, natural resources, and land use litigation: Represented Lee County Commission as plaintiff in filing anticipatory nuisance lawsuit and negotiated settlement providing (1) additional environmental protections beyond the limited protections provided by state regulations for Halawakee Creek, a free-flowing stream of “outstandingly remarkable” natural and cultural value (National Rivers Inventory), its watershed, and ecological habitat as well as the local water supply
- (2) reimbursement of the County’s legal fees in bringing the lawsuit
- and (3) limitations on further quarry development by defendants in Lee County-all without waiving any claims for future harms that might be caused by the quarry. • Environmental/chemical products liability litigation: Defended a city waterworks and sewer board and individual board members in a putative class action and then in a series of mass tort and individual claims alleging personal injury and property damage from the distribution of water from the Tennessee River contaminated with PFAS and related chemicals from upstream manufacturers
- the claims were dismissed with prejudice in In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2:18-mn-2873, RMG in Charleston, South Carolina. • Environmental/chemical products liability litigation: Defended a global manufacturing company in cases brought by two city water utilities regarding alleged contamination by numerous defendants of the utilities’ source waters, the Tennessee River and the Alabama River, by PFAS “forever chemicals.” • Environmental litigation: Defended waterworks and sewer board in state enforcement case and Clean Water Act (CWA) citizen suit regarding sanitary sewer overflows (“SSOs”) and permit non-compliance and negotiated consent decree for remediation to resolve both cases. • False Claims Act/qui tam: Defended hospice company in investigation and qui tam case for submission of claims to Medicare for patients who allegedly did not meet eligibility requirements for benefits with treble damages claimed of $7,462,515.90. • Commercial litigation: Defended corporation, CEO, and CFO in federal lawsuit by rail transportation company alleging breach of contract, fraud, and RICO violations and damages of $370,836,753 and negotiated settlement of all claims. • White collar (Environmental crime): Represented trucking company in investigation of alleged illegal dumping of hazardous waste (no charges). • False Claims Act/Anti-Kickback litigation: Defended a nursing home regarding referrals to mental health facilities and obtained affirmance of dismissal of qui tam relator’s claims with prejudice at the Eleventh Circuit. • Environmental litigation: Defended public water authority in two mass tort cases and one putative class action alleging personal injuries and property damage from exposure to PFAS and related chemicals through authority’s distribution of water released by upstream manufacturers into the Tennessee River, the authority’s source water, and obtained two dismissals and negotiated one nominal settlement of $5,000. • Environmental, natural resources, and land use: Represented City of Opelika, Storybook Farm, and Retirement Systems of Alabama in successful rejection of proposed granite quarry that threatened the Saugahatchee watershed, the city water supply, a charitable equine and canine therapy farm for at-risk children, and the Robert Trent Jones - Grand National golf course and facilities and negotiated settlement of threatened inverse condemnation (“takings”) action by property owner. • White collar (Environmental crime): Represented recycling and transport service companies in federal criminal investigation of hazardous waste disposal practices (no charges). • Environmental litigation: Defended Clean Water Act citizen suit against landowner for alleged unpermitted discharges of pollutant into Black Warrior River from reclaimed mine site
- settled by consent decree with site currently under remediation. • Commercial litigation: Obtained dismissal of plaintiffs’ False Claims Act and Sarbanes-Oxley claims in case removed to federal court, and then obtained summary judgment on state law fraud, bid-rigging, defamation, tortious interference, and deceptive trade practices claims remanded to state court. • Healthcare fraud/commercial litigation (corporate plaintiff): Advised large physician practice in conjunction with fraud investigations and overpayment recoupment action-obtaining on administrative appeal revision of alleged $2,700,000.00 overpayment to $2,100.00 through the presentation of statistical, independent audit, and medical necessity evidence-and then obtaining on behalf of client as plaintiff injunction of government for wrongful garnishment of funds from client. • White collar (Business crime)/securities regulation:Represented corporate officer/lawyer in parallel securities and accounting fraud investigations of publicly traded defense contractor and various C-suite individuals by the Department of Justice (USAO SDNY) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (New York) and in conjunction with SEC administrative proceeding that resulted in corporate penalties and restatement of earnings but no liability for client. • Commercial litigation:Defended recycling and transport services companies in litigation brought by a recycling and disposal site owner, obtained dismissal of claims against clients, and obtained a counterclaim judgment in favor of clients in the amount of $929,478. • Commercial litigation: Defended wastewater operations and management company against fraud and breach of contract claims totaling over $2,100,000 related to installation of a decentralized cluster wastewater management system and negotiated settlement amounting to one-seventh of the sum sought by plaintiff. • White collar (Environmental crime): Represented corporate client in conjunction with negotiated plea agreement for single-count misdemeanor Clean Water Act violation and obtained reinstatement to federal program participation for compliant client after term of mandatory debarment. • Criminal defense/post-conviction relief: In a case The American Lawyer named “Most Inspiring Pro Bono Win of 2015” [United States v
- Rivera] Richard and co-counsel obtained the release from federal prison of an individual incarcerated for 30 years for non-violent drug crimes. • Commercial litigation (for corporate plaintiff): Sued insurer in federal court on pollution policy for bad faith claims denial and negotiated settlement valued in excess of $2,500,000 for plaintiff policyholder. • Commercial litigation (for plaintiffs): Prosecuted claims for bad faith violation of federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA), for failure to maintain commercially reasonable security procedures and for other related torts on behalf of victims of identity theft/account hacking and obtained full recovery of clients’ funds (almost $200,000) along with attorneys’ fees. • Environmental litigation: Woods Knoll, LLC v
- City of Lincoln: Obtained defense judgment for City of Lincoln in federal trial of Clean Water Act and inverse condemnation claims brought by adjacent property owner complaining of $1,840,000 in damage to 239-acre property, including wetlands, allegedly caused by discharges of storm water from 160-acre city property being developed as an industrial park
- presented oral argument and obtained affirmance of defense judgment before 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. • White collar (Environmental crime): Defended corporate client charged with criminal violations of Clean Water Act and related charges of mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy in federal jury trial. • Environmental (multiple CERCLA cases): Represented numerous clients, variously in investigations and litigation, as potentially responsible parties (PRPs) at the LWD Incinerator site (Calvert City, Kentucky), Anniston PCB and lead sites (Calhoun and Talladega Counties, Alabama), Alabama Plating (Vincent, Alabama), B&B Manufacturing (Mobile, Alabama), M & J Solvents (Fulton County, Georgia), and Interstate Lead (Leeds, Alabama) Superfund sites and the Reef Environmental (Sylacauga, Alabama), Shredders, Inc. (North Birmingham, Alabama), Alabama Wood Treating (Mobile, Alabama), and Allworth (Tarrant, Alabama) sites. • Multiple False Claims Act investigations: Represented numerous healthcare providers-including medical doctors, corporate physician practices, nursing homes, a psychiatrist, a pharmacy, and the supervisor of two compounded pharmaceutical sales groups-in investigations of alleged upcoding of physical therapy encounters
- upcoding of surgical procedures
- double-billing
- medically unnecessary prescription and administration of anti-depressants, anti-psychotics, anti-anxiety medications, and Nuedexta
- and prescription and administration of medically unnecessary diagnostic testing and hyaluronic acid injections. • Commercial litigation (corporate defendant-counterclaim plaintff): Defended vaccine developer in a fee collection action by a contract research organization (CRO) and counterclaimed on behalf of client for laboratory malpractice because CRO had, without a literature review, used infection-resistant C57BL/6 congenic (“knockout”) mice in its vaccine trial
- Negotiated settlement payment in excess of $1,000,000 for client-a multiple of more than 2.5 the amount of fees sought by the CRO on the collection claim. • Environmental, natural resources, and land use litigation: University of Montevallo, et al. v
- Middle Tennessee Land Development Company, LLC: Obtained anticipatory injunction for plaintiffs, a university and its foundation, after a two-week trial consisting largely of hydrogeological and quantitative hydrogeological expert testimony, to protect the Ebenezer Swamp Ecological Preserve-the “scenic highlight” of the University of Montevallo-from proposed limestone quarrying activity
- Ebenezer Swamp University of Montevallo Ebenezer Swamp - Alabama Birding Trails News & Insights • Twelve Starnes Attorneys Selected for Mid-South Super Lawyers 2025 •35 Starnes Attorneys Listed in Best Lawyers in America 2026 •Starnes Davis Florie Ranked a Top Law Firm by Chambers USA 2025 •L&E Newsletter Alert- President Trump Bans DEI - January 2025 •Fourteen Attorneys Selected for Mid-South Super Lawyers 2024 •33 Starnes Attorneys Listed in Best Lawyers in America 2025 •Starnes Davis Florie Ranked a Top Law Firm by Chambers USA 2024 •Eleven Attorneys Selected for Mid-South Super Lawyers 2023 •Starnes Davis Florie Ranked as a “Highly Recommended Litigation Firm” in the 2024 Edition of Benchmark Litigation •SDF’s Davis, Eagan & Ezelle Named Best Lawyers “2024 Lawyer of the Year” •30 Starnes Attorneys Listed in Best Lawyers in America 2024 •Starnes Davis Florie Ranked a Top Law Firm by Chambers USA 2023 •SDF’s Richard Davis & Brittney Claud Obtain Favorable Judgment for Family Physician in Medicare Overpayment/Recoupment Case •16 Starnes Attorneys Listed in the 2022 Edition of Mid-South Super Lawyers •30 SDF ATTORNEYS LISTED IN BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA 2023 •STARNES DAVIS FLORIE RANKED A TOP FIRM BY CHAMBERS USA 2022 •US Department of Labor Announces Enforcement, Effort for Focused Inspections in Hospitals, Nursing Care Facilities Treating COVID-19 Patients •TWENTY-TWO ATTORNEYS NAMED TO THE 2021 EDITION OF MID-SOUTH SUPER LAWYERS •DOJ Announces Renewed, Enhanced Focus on Corporate Crime •29 SDF ATTORNEYS LISTED IN BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA 2022
Practice Areas Explained
Richard Eldon Davis's Areas of Legal Practice
Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Richard Eldon Davis handles, with a practical overview of what that area of law involves and how it may apply to your situation in Birmingham.
Personal Injury in Birmingham
Personal injury attorneys help accident victims recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain & suffering. Most work on contingency — no fee unless you win.
Richard Eldon Davis is one of 262,557 personal injury attorneys indexed nationally. Browse personal injury attorneys in Alabama →
Criminal Defense in Birmingham
A criminal defense attorney protects your rights from arrest through trial. Find experienced lawyers handling DUI, drug, federal, theft, and violent-crime charges.
Richard Eldon Davis is one of 212,605 criminal defense attorneys indexed nationally. Browse criminal defense attorneys in Alabama →
Business & Corporate Law in Birmingham
Business attorneys advise founders and growing companies on entity formation, contracts, financing, M&A, and dispute resolution.
Richard Eldon Davis is one of 497,491 business attorneys indexed nationally. Browse business attorneys in Alabama →
Land Use & Zoning in Birmingham
Richard Eldon Davis is one of 39,875 zoning attorneys indexed nationally. Browse zoning attorneys in Alabama →
White Collar Crimes in Birmingham
Richard Eldon Davis is one of 19,824 white collar attorneys indexed nationally. Browse white collar attorneys in Alabama →
Jurisdictional Context
Why Local Counsel Matters in Birmingham
Practicing law in Alabama. Legal matters in Alabama are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Birmingham are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Alabama state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Alabama brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this venue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Alabama courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.
Birmingham Courts and Legal Process
Choosing a Birmingham-based attorney means your counsel already knows the local docketing timelines, preferred filing formats, and how individual judges typically rule on procedural motions — details that only come from practicing in this jurisdiction day after day. That local familiarity can translate to better strategy, faster filings, and fewer costly surprises.
Looking for additional Alabama attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Birmingham or all attorneys in Alabama.
Frequently Asked
Common Questions About Richard Eldon Davis
Where is Richard Eldon Davis's law office located?
What practice areas does Richard Eldon Davis handle?
Where did Richard Eldon Davis go to law school?
How can I contact Richard Eldon Davis for a consultation?
What awards or recognition has Richard Eldon Davis received?
Professional Profile
Why Clients in Birmingham Choose Richard Eldon Davis
Selecting an attorney is one of the most consequential decisions you can make when a legal matter arises. Below are the core qualities that distinguish Richard Eldon Davis's practice in the field of personal injury, criminal defense, business, zoning, and white collar.
Broad Practice Area Coverage
Covering personal injury, criminal defense, and business, Richard Eldon Davis can address the full spectrum of a client's legal needs without requiring referrals to separate specialists for each issue.
Local Presence in Birmingham
A Birmingham-based practice means Richard Eldon Davis attends hearings in the same courthouses, knows the local clerks, and understands the unwritten scheduling norms that affect every case filed here.
Case Types
Common Legal Issues Richard Eldon Davis Handles in Birmingham
Below is a representative sample of the types of matters Richard Eldon Davis has experience with under Alabama law. If your situation involves one of these case categories, this attorney may be well positioned to help you understand your options.
This list is illustrative, not exhaustive. Contact Richard Eldon Davis directly to discuss the specifics of your situation.
Search Reference
How People Find Richard Eldon Davis Online
Prospective clients searching for legal help in Birmingham commonly use a combination of the attorney's name and their specific legal need. The following search terms frequently lead people to this profile and to attorneys like Richard Eldon Davis.
If any of the above matches what you searched for, you've found the right profile. Use the contact options at the top of this page to get in touch with Richard Eldon Davis directly.
Richard Eldon Davis's Practice Areas & Specializations
Education & Law School Background
Awards & Professional Honors
Client Reviews & Ratings — Richard Eldon Davis
No reviews yet.