Brooke BRICKER, Respondent, v. James BRICKER, Appellant
Missouri Court of Appeals
· February 16, 2016 · Docket No. ED 102784
481 S.W.3d 890
Syllabus
Brooke BRICKER, Respondent, v. James BRICKER, Appellant. No. ED 102784 Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO. Filed: February 16, 2016 Alan W. Cohen, 501- North Taylor Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, for Appellant. Elaine A. Pudlowski, Frankel, Rubin, Bond, Dubin, Siegel & Klein, P.C., 231 South Bémiston Avenue, Suite 1111, Clayton, Missouri 63105. Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless,. J.
Full Opinion (828 characters)
ORDER PER CURIAM James Bricker (Husband) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dissolving his marriage to Brooke Bricker (Wife) and awarding Wife sole legal and physical custody of the children. Husband argues that the trial court erred by 1) failing to grant Husband unsupervised visitation, 2) ordering Husband to pay fifty percent of the children’s private schooling costs, and 3) dividing Husband’s pension through the- Fireman’s Retirement System of St. Louis. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record' on appeal and have determined that' an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.