Charles FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Florida District Court of Appeal
· July 18, 2012 · Docket No. 4D10-5276
93 So. 3d 460
Syllabus
Charles FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D10-5276. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 18, 2012. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Full Opinion (956 characters)
PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. He claims prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument when the prosecutor referred to the defendant several times as having lied. The objection was not preserved, but even so, the prosecutor’s comments were not improper. See Craig v. State, 510 So.2d 857, 865 (Fla.1987) (“When counsel refers to a witness or a defendant as being a ‘liar,’ and it is understood from the context that the charge is made with reference to testimony given by the person thus characterized, the prosecutor is merely submitting to the jury a conclusion that he is arguing can be drawn from the evidence.”). Not only was it a permissible inference that defendant had lied in his testimony, but it could also be inferred that he had lied to his supervisors on the evening of the incident regarding his actions, all of which was corroborated by the testimony of other witnesses. WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.