Hampton v. Rouse

Syllabus

Hampton v. Rouse. Where ft writ of error was made returnable to the first Monday of December (a return day then, within a month, abolished by act of Congress),, instead of being made returnable the second Monday of October, next ensuing,"the day which the act fixed thenceforth as the return day, held that the mistake was amendable under the third Bection of the act of June 1st, 1872, “to further the administration of justice,” which empowers the court to allow amendments in certain cases, including the ease “ where the writ is made returnable on a day other than the day of the commencement of the term next ensuing the issue of the writ.” On motion to amend a writ of error. Prior to the 24th of January, 1878, the annual session of this court began on the first Monday of December in each year; and writs of error were, of course, returnable to that day. But by an act approved on the 24th, just mentioned, the day was changed; Congress enacting that thenceforth the session should commence “ on the second Monday of October of each year.” By an act of a previous date, the act of June 1st, 1872, “ to further the administration of justice,” it had been thus, in the third section of the act, provided: “ That the Supreme Court may, at any time, in its discretion, and upon such terms as it may deem just, and where the defect has not injured and the amendment will not prejudice the defendant in error, allow an amendment of a writ of error, when there is a mistake in the teste of the writ,