Phillip David JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Florida District Court of Appeal
· December 21, 2011 · Docket No. 2D10-645
100 So. 3d 80
Syllabus
Phillip David JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D10-645. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. Dec. 21, 2011. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Full Opinion (1,042 characters)
WHATLEY, Judge. In this appeal of his conviction and sentence for the offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm, Phillip David Jackson argues that his written sentence is erroneous because it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, it places him on drug offender probation when he does not qualify for such, and it imposes numerous special conditions of probation when only two of those conditions were pronounced at sentencing. He preserved these sentencing issues by filing a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2)(A). Although the trial court entered an order granting the relief sought in Jackson’s motion, it never corrected the written sentence and order of probation. We remand for the limited purpose of the trial court correcting Jackson’s sentence and order of probation in accordance with its March 29, 2011, order granting Jackson’s rule 3.800(b)(2)(A) motion. See Owens v. State, 1 So.3d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). WALLACE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.