Santi JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals
· March 28, 2017 · Docket No. ED 104034
514 S.W.3d 646
Syllabus
Santi JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 104034 Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE. Filed: March 28, 2017 Kristina Starke Olson, Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Full Opinion (467 characters)
ORDER PER CURIAM. Santi Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.