Joseph Edward KUCZKO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Florida District Court of Appeal
· December 16, 2011 · Docket No. 2D10-5003
76 So. 3d 357
Syllabus
Joseph Edward KUCZKO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D10-5003. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. Dec. 16, 2011. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnés, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Full Opinion (798 characters)
DAVIS, Judge. Joseph Edward Kuczko challenges the revocation of his probation based on his having committed a new law violation. We affirm both the revocation and the resulting sentence without further comment. However, the written order of revocation reflects that Kuczko violated two conditions of his probation, while the transcript of the revocation hearing shows that his probation was revoked based on the violation of only one condition. We therefore remand for the limited purpose of the entry of a corrected written order of revocation which conforms with the oral pronouncement. See Harvester v. State, 62 So.3d 1235, 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); McNeil v. State, 908 So.2d 556, 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Affirmed and remanded for entry of a corrected order. VILLANTI and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.