Donald M. MUDD, Appellant, v. Carolyn J. STAPLETON-MUDD, Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
· September 4, 2018 · Docket No. ED 105517
556 S.W.3d 126
Syllabus
Donald M. MUDD, Appellant, v. Carolyn J. STAPLETON-MUDD, Respondent. No. ED 105517 Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE. Filed: September 4, 2018 FOR APPELLANT: Lawrence G. Gillespie, 120 South Central Avenue, Ste. 650, Clayton, MO 63105, Deborah K. Roeder, 1221 Locust, Ste. 1006, St. Louis, MO 63103. FOR RESPONDENT: Michael L. Schechter, Anne E. Lageson, 8000 Maryland Ave., Ste. 950, St. Louis, Mo 63105. Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J. ORDER
Full Opinion (572 characters)
PER CURIAM.
Donald M. Mudd ("Husband") appeals the judgment dissolving his marriage to Carolyn J. Stapleton-Mudd ("Wife"). We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
We deny Wife's motion taken with the case, which requests our Court to strike Husband's brief, to dismiss his appeal, and to award Wife damages because Husband's appeal is allegedly frivolous.
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.