Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Tafas v. Doll
Triantafyllos TAFAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Smithkline Beecham Corporation (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Smithkline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Limited (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John J. DOLL, Act
In re Ferguson
In re Lewis FERGUSON, Darryl Costin and Scott C. Harris. No. 2007-1232. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 6, 2009. Scott C. Harris, of Rancho Santa Fe, CA, argued for appellants. Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, Office of th
Rein v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
Bert W. REIN; Hunton & Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE; United States Department of Commerce, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1738. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: Oct. 28, 20
In re Comiskey
In re Stephen W. COMISKEY. No. 2006-1286. Serial No. 09/461,742. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Revised: Jan. 26, 2009. Decided: Jan. 13, 2009. Thomas J. Scott, Jr., Goodwin Procter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appel
Hyatt v. Dudas
Gilbert P. HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon W. DUDAS, Director, Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 2007-1050, 2007-1051, 2007-1052, 2007-1053. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 23, 2008. Kenneth C. B
In re Basell Poliolefine Italia S.P.A.
In re BASELL POLIOLEFINE ITALIA S.P.A. No. 2007-1450. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Nov. 13, 2008. Warren K. MacRae, Loeb & Loeb LLP, of New York, NY, argued for appellant. Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor, Office of
In re DBC
In re DBC. No. 2008-1120. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Nov. 3, 2008. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan 16, 2009. Lawrence M. Jarvis, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., of Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. With him
In re Alonso
In re Kenneth ALONSO. No. 2008-1079. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 30, 2008. Jennifer A. Johnson, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With her on the brief
In re Bilski
In re Bernard L. BILSKI and Rand A. Warsaw. No. 2007-1130. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 30, 2008. David C. Hanson, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, PA, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Richard L. B
Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDOZ, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 2007-1300. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 21, 2008. Ted G. Dane, Munger, Tolies & Olson LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-
Ropes & Gray LLP v. Jalbert
In re ENGAGE, INC., et al., Debtors Ropes & Gray LLP, Appellant, v. Craig R. Jalbert, as Liquidating Supervisor, Appellee. No. 08-1257. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard Sept. 8, 2008. Decided Oct. 6, 2008. D. Ross Martin
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Lucent Technologies Guardian I LLC, Counterclaim Defendant, and Multimedia Patent Trust, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. GATEWAY, INC., Gateway Country Stores L
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology & IGT
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY and IGT, Defendants-Appellees. No. 2008-1016. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 22
In re Swanson
In re Melvin J. SWANSON and Patrick E. Guire. No. 2007-1534. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 4, 2008. Robert M. Asher, Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellants. Mary L. Kelly, Associate
Astrazeneca AB v. Apotex Corp.
In re OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION Astrazeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, KBI-E, Inc., KBI, Inc., and Astrazeneca LP, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Cygnus Telecommunications Technology, LLC v. Telesys Communications, LLC
In re CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PATENT LITIGATION. Cygnus Telecommunications Technology, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Telesys Communications, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and United World Telecom, L.C., Defendant-Appellee, and
Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas
COOPER TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon W. DUDAS, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee, and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2008-1130. United States Court of Appeals, F
Proveris Scientific Corp. v. Innovasystems, Inc.
PROVERIS SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (formerly known as Image Therm Engineering, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INNOVASYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 2007-1428. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 5, 2008. Susan H. Farin
Burandt v. Dudas
Corliss O. BURANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon W. DUDAS, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2007-1504. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 10, 2008. Scott F. Yarnell, Hunton & Wil
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Lucent Technologies Guardian I LLC, Counterclaim Defendant, and Multimedia Patent Trust, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. GATEWAY, INC., Gateway Country Stores L
City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.
[No. S129463. Apr. 24, 2008.] CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GENENTECH, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Counsel Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Steven L. Mayer, Amy L.
In re Nuijten
In re Petrus A.C.M. NUIJTEN. No. 2006-1371. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Feb. 11, 2008. Jack E. Haken, Philips Intellectual Property & Standards, of Briarcliff Manor, NY, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for the ap
Vail Associates, Inc. v. Vend-Tel-Co.
VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., and Vail Trademarks, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VEND-TEL-CO., LTD., and Eric A. Hanson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-1058. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Feb. 7, 2008. Glenn K. Beaton (Stephen C.
Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. Clark Machinery Co.
VOLVO TRADEMARK HOLDING AKTIEBOLAGET, a Swedish corporation; Volvo Construction Equipment North America, a Delaware corporation; Champion Road Machinery Limited, a Canadian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CLARK MACHINERY COMPANY, an A
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.