Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEXINGTON MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 548. Argued January 5, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. The primary purpose of Congress in enacting the Fo
Baccus v. Louisiana
BACCUS v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. ERROR TO THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CLAIBORNE, STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 170. Argued January 19, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. This court will not disregard the construction placed upon a sta
Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. St. Francis Levee District
CHAPMAN & DEWEY LUMBER CO. v. ST. FRANCIS LEVEE DISTRICT. ERROR TQ. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 82. Argued December 12, 1913. Decided January 26, 1914. Whether particular lands patented by the-United States to a State ha
Barrett v. City of New York
BARRETT, PRESIDENT OF ADAMS EXPRESS CO., v. CITY OF NEW YORK. CITY OF NEW YORK v. BARRETT, PRESIDENT OF ADAMS EXPRESS CO. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Nos. 83, 84
Street & Smith v. Atlas Manufacturing Co.
STREET & SMITH, A COPARTNERSHIP, v. ATLAS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT., No 618. Submitted November 10, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Judgments and decrees of the Circuit Courts of
Monson v. Simonson
MONSON v. SIMONSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 14. Submitted October 30, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Restrictions on alienation imposed by § 5 of the act of February 8, 1887,24 Stat. 388, c. 119, on an
Little v. Williams
LITTLE v. WILLIAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 8. Submitted October 30, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. In this case, held that the interpretation by the State Court of a stipulation of counsel was not open to
Straus v. American Publishers' Ass'n
STRAUS AND STRAUS, COMPOSING THE FIRM OF R. H. MACY & COMPANY, v. AMERICAN PUBLISHERS’ ASSOCIATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 19. Argued March 7, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. One who sets up a Federal statu
Union Pacific Railroad v. Snow
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SNOW. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 682. Submitted October 14, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Courts will not enforce a literal interpretation of a statute if antecedent rights a
Luria v. United States
LURIA v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 27. Argued April 23, 1913. Decided October 20, 1913. Where a point involving sufficiency of the complaint is not raised a
Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell
BAUER & CIE v. O’DONNELL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 951. Argued April 10, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The right to make, use and sell an invented article existed without, and before, the passage
Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 269. Argued April 30, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. The Land Grant Adjustment Acts of 1887 and 1896 did not provide for an
Bradford v. United States
BRADFORD v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 571. Submitted March 24, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. One convicted of fraud in- obtaining patents to public lands filed a petition for pardon which was granted on condition t
Lyle v. Patterson
LYLE v. PATTERSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 167. Argued March 5, 1913 Decided April 7, 1913. Quaere, whether the benefits of the act of March 3,1887, providing for settlement of titles of purchase
Plested v. Abbey
PLESTED v. ABBEY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. No. 156. Argued January 31, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Subordinate officers of the'Land Department 'are under the control, and their acts a
Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.
THE FAIR v. KOHLER DIE AND SPECIALTY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 169. Argued March 6, 1913. Decided March 24, 1913. Where plaintiff relies upon infringement of his p
United States ex rel. Knight v. Lane
UNITED STATES EX REL. KNIGHT v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. IN ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA,. No. 163. Argued March 5, 6, 1913. Decided March 17, 1913. Until, the legal title to public land passes from the
Abilene National Bank v. Dolley
ABILENE NATIONAL BANK v. DOLLEY, BANK COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. APPEAL FROM. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ■ DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 175. Submitted March 5, 1913. Decided March 17, 1913. The Kansas Bank Depositor
Starr v. Long Jim
STARR v. LONG JIM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 151. Argued January 28, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. An agreement as to division and allotment of lands between the Secretary of the Interior and chiefs repre
United States ex rel. Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher
UNITED STATES EX REL. CHAMPION LUMBER COMPANY v. FISHER, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted January 27, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Under subd. 5 of § 25
Wadkins v. Producers Oil Co.
WADKINS v. PRODUCERS OIL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 638. Argued January 31, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Whore defendant’s claim to land formerly part of the public domain is based on his grantor’
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 500. Argued January 8, 9, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. While punctuation is a fallible standard of the meaning of a s
Scott v. Lattig
SCOTT v. LATTIG. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 86. Argued December 13, 1912. Decided February 3, 1913. An error in omitting an island in a navigable stream does not divest the United States of the title or interpose
United States v. Winslow
UNITED STATES v. WINSLOW. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 620. Argued January 10, 1913. Decided February 3, 1913. On appeals under the Criminal'Appeals Act of 1907 this court has no ju
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.