Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1910

Ludwig v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

LUDWIG, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 45. Argued April 18, 14, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. On the author

216 U.S. 146 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1910

Brill v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.

BRILL v. WASHINGTON RAILWAY AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT • OF COLUMBIA., No. 66. Argued December 10, 13, 1909. Decided January 17, 1910. Where a decree to which he is privy has established the'.righ

215 U.S. 527 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1910

Union Pacific Railroad v. Harris

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. HARRIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 19. Argued November 2, 1909. Decided January 3, 1910. The words “public lands” in legislation refer to such lands as are subject to sale or oth

215 U.S. 386 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1909

United States v. Sutton

UNITED STATES v. SUTTON. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 312. Submitted October 15, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. United States v. Celestine, ante, p. 278, followed, as to cont

215 U.S. 291 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1909

United States v. Celestine

UNITED STATES v. CELESTINE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 235. Argued October 14, 1909. Decided December 13, 1909. Although an Indian may be made a citizen of the United States .

215 U.S. 278 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.

CALIGA v. INTER OCEAN NEWSPAPER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued November 5, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. Statutory copyrightls not to be confoiinded with the exclusive

215 U.S. 182 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

Steward v. American Lava Co.

STEWARD v. AMERICAN LAVA COMPANY. MORITZ KIRCHBERGER v. AMERICAN LAVA COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEARS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 27, 28. Argued November 10, 11, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. A patent cannot be sustai

215 U.S. 161 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Co.

RUMFORD CHEMICAL WORKS v. HYGIENIC CHEMICAL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY. HYGIENIC CHEMICAL COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. RUMFORD CHEMICAL WORKS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

215 U.S. 156 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Scully v. Squier

SCULLY v. SQUIER ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 21. Argued November 5, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. Where plaintiff bhses his bill on the contention that under the town-,site law, §2387, -Rev. Stat.,. the ascertai

215 U.S. 144 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1909

McGilvra v. Ross

McGILVRA AND BRESSLER, v. ROSS, STATE LAND COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 328. Argued October 19, 20, 1909. Decided November 15, 1909. While the con

215 U.S. 70 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Fleming v. McCurtain

FLEMING v. McCURTAIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 253. Argued October 20, 21, 1909. Decided November 8, 1909. The giant in letters patent, issued in pursuance of the treaty of

215 U.S. 56 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Reavis v. Fianza

REAVIS v. FIANZA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME CQURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 16. Argued April 26, 27, 1909. Decided November 1, 1909. This court has jurisdiction of this case; for, even if the requisite amount is not involved, the meaning

215 U.S. 16 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1909

Expanded Metal Co. v. Bradford

EXPANDED METAL COMPANY v. BRADFORD. GENERAL FIREPROOFING COMPANY v. EXPANDED METAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 66, 606. Ar

214 U.S. 366 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Bong v. Alfred S. Campbell Art Co.

BONG, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ALFRED S. CAMPBELL ART COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 150. Argued April 15, 1909. Decided May 24, 1909. Under § 4952, Rev. Stat., as amended by the act of March 3, 189

214 U.S. 236 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

Rogers v. Jones

ROGERS v. JONES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 196. Submitted April 27, 1909. Decided May 24, 1909. Where the disposition of a Federal question is not necessary to the determination of the cause and the judgmen

214 U.S. 196 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Whitcomb v. White

WHITCOMB v. WHITE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 185. Argued April-28, 29, 1909. Decided May 17, 1909. Where a decision of the Land Department rests 'on the priority of équitable rights ;of a contestant it is conclus

214 U.S. 15 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

Ex parte Heller

Ex parte ISAAC HELLER, PETITIONER. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No.-. Original. Submitted April 27, 1909. Decided May 3, 1909. Petition for leave to file petition for mandamus to compel the Circuit' Court of Appea

214 U.S. 501 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Boquillas Land & Cattle Co. v. Curtis

BOQUILLAS LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY v. CURTIS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. No. 133. Argued April 7, 1909. Decided April 19, 1909. Under § 3198, Rev. Stat. of Arizona of 1887, the common-law doctrine of riparian

213 U.S. 339 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co.

LEEDS & CATLIN COMPANY v. VICTOR TALKING MACHINE COMPANY (NO. 2). CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 81. Argued January 18, 1909. Decided April 19, 1909. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co.,

213 U.S. 325 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co.

LEEDS AND CATLIN COMPANY v. VICTOR TALKING MACHINE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE. CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 80. Argued January 15, 18, 1909. Decided April 19, 1909. Where grave questions of fact are presented by the

213 U.S. 301 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

In re Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.

MATTER OF CONSOLIDATED RUBBER TIRE COMPANY, PETITIONER. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. Original. Submitted April 5, 1909. Decided April 12, 1909. Leave to file petition for writ of prohibition to prohibit the Uni

214 U.S. 490 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Toy Toy v. Hopkins

TOY TOY v. HOPKINS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. No. 49. Argued December 9, 1908. Decided February 23, 1909. After the Circuit Court of the United- States

212 U.S. 542 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1909

Greenameyer v. Coate

GREENAMEYER v. COATE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 100. Submitted January 4, 1909. Decided February 23, 1909. When the Secretary of the Interior has jurisdiction of a land contest and grants a rehearing he

212 U.S. 434 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1909

Bradford v. Morrison

BRADFORD v. MORRISON. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE. TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. No. 60. Argued January 7, 1909. Decided February 23, 1909. The title of a locator to a mining claim located under § 2322, Rev. Stat., is not only property, bu

212 U.S. 389 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion