Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Personal Injury · New York 1845

Pollard v. Hagan

John Pollard et al., Lessee, Plaintiff in error, v. John Hagan et al., Defendants in Error. The stipulation cbntainedjn the 6th section 'of the act of Congress, passed, on the 2d of March,1819, for the admission of the state of-Alabama into

44 U.S. 212 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a · New York 1845

Taylor v. United States

John Taylor, Junior, and William Blackburne and Co., Claimants of cloths and kerseymeres, Plaintiffs in error, v. The United States, Defendants in error. It is the right of an officer of the customs to seize goods which are suspected tcrhav

44 U.S. 197 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Croghan v. Nelson

Lessee of Angelica Croghan et al., Plaintiff, v. John Nelson, Defendant. In making an entry of land, where mistakes occur which are occasioned by the impracticability of ascertaining the relative positions of the objects-called for, the cou

44 U.S. 187 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law · New York 1845

Searight v. Stokes

William Searight, Commissioner and Superintendent of the Cumberland Road, within the State of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff in error, v. William B. Stokes and Lucius W. Stockton, who have survived Richard C. Stockton, Defendants in error. tinder

44 U.S. 151 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Remanded Tax Law · New York 1845

Gordon v. Appeal Tax Court

Samuel Gordon, Plaintiff in error, v. The Appeal Tax Court. James Cheston, Plaintiff in error, v. The Appeal Tax Court. The charter of a hank is ¿'franchise, which is not taxable, as such, if a price has been paid for it, which the legislat

44 U.S. 133 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

United States v. Gear

The United States, Plaintiff, v. Hezekiah H. Gear, Defendant. The United States, Complainant, v. Hezekiah H. Gear, Defendant. The act of Congress .entitled “ An act to create additional land districts in the ._ states of Illinois- and Misso

44 U.S. 120 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt · New York 1845

Waller v. Best

Lessee of Henry Waller, Assignee of the bankrupt estate of Francis A. Savage, Plaintiff, v. James and Joseph Best. In Kentucky, the creditor obtains a lien upon the property of his debtor by the delivery of a.fi.fa. to the sheriff; and this

44 U.S. 111 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a · New York 1845

Swartwout v. Gihon

Samuel Swartwout, Plaintiff in error, v. John Gihon et al. When ’ an importer tneans to contest the payment of duties, it is not necessary-for him to give a written notice thereof to the collector. The question of notice is-a fact for the j

44 U.S. 110 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law · New York 1845

Curtis v. Martin

Edward Curtis, Plaintiff in error, v. William Martin and Charles A. Coe, Defendants. An act of Congress imposing a duty upon imports must be construed to describe the article upon which the duty is imposed, according to the commercial under

44 U.S. 106 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Family Law · New York 1845

Ex parte Dorr

Ex Parte Dorr. Neither the-Supreme Court, nor any other court of the United States, or judge thereof, can issue a habeas corpus to bring up a prisoner, who is in custody under a sentence or execution óf a state court,' for any other purpose

44 U.S. 103 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury · New York 1845

Kendall v. Stokes

Amos Kendall, Plaintiff in error, v. William B. Stokes, Lucius W. Stockton, and Daniel Moore, survivors of Richard C. Stockton, Defendants in error. [The reader is referred to a former case between these parties, reported in 12 Peters, 524.

44 U.S. 87 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Remanded · New York 1845

Poultney v. City of Lafayette

Emily Poultney et al., Appellants, v. The City of Lafayette, Isaac T. Preston et al., Defendants. Before a case can be dismissed under the 21st rule, regulating equity practice, there must exist, in the technical sense, a plea or demurrer o

44 U.S. 81 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law · New York 1845

Henderson v. Anderson

William Henderson, Plaintiff in error, v. John Anderson. This court adheres to the rule laid down in Walton v. Shelly, i T. it. 296, sustained as it has been by tire decisions of this court'in The Bank'of the United States v. Bunn, 6 Peters

44 U.S. 73 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law · New York 1845

Walker v. President of the Bank of Washington

John Walker, Plaintiff in error, v. The President and Directors of the Bank of Washington, Defendant in error. Every subsequent security» given for a loan originally usurious, however remote or often yenewed, is void. Where there was an app

44 U.S. 62 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate · New York 1845

Dickson v. Wilkinson ex rel. Wilkinson

James N. and Levi Dickson, Plaintiffs, v. William H. Wilkinson, Administrator of John T. Wilkinson, deceased. There was a judgment against an administrator of assets guando acciderint. Upon this judgment a scire facias was issued, containin

44 U.S. 57 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury · New York 1845

Barry v. Gamble

James Barry, Plaintiff in error, v. Hamilton R. Gamble. Under the act of 1815, a New Madrid certificate-could be located upon lands before .they were offered', at public sale under a proclamation of the President, or even surveyed'by the pu

44 U.S. 32 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury · New York 1845

Aldridge v. Williams

Andrew Aldridge and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. Nathaniel F. Williams. The act of Congress, of March 2d, 1833,. commonly called the Compromise Act, did not, prospectively, repeal all duties upon imports after the 30th of June, . 1842. R

44 U.S. 9 New York Supreme Court Read opinion