Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Pennsylvania Cases
426 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Vaughan v. Blanchard
*SEPTEMBER TERM, 1792. Vaughan et al., Assignees of Nancarrow, v. Blanchard et al. Nonsuit. — Landlord and tenant. The court will not direct a nonsuit, for want of proof, by the plaintiffs, of a material fact, where they have offered some e
Shaw v. Wallace
September Term, 1792. Shaw versus Wallace. THIS cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant’s attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New-York
Lawson v. Morrison
July Session, 1792. Lawson, Appellant, versus Morrison, et. al. Appellees. APPEAL from a sentence of the Register of Wills &c. and two justices of the Common Pleas for the County of Cumberland. The case had been argued in July 1789, (before
Massey v. Leaming
Massey et al., executors of Massey, v. Leaming. Legacy to a debtor. Testatrix had, for some time before her death, been in a low state of health; the defendant had taken charge of her affairs, and had some accounts against her, but had borr
Gander's Lessee v. Burns
Gander’s Lessee v. Burns et al. Conflicting locations. In case of conflicting warrants, if there be ground enough to satisfy both, each party will be confined to what he purchased. Ejectment for lands in Mifflin county. On the trial of the
Calhoun's Lessee v. Dunning
Calhoun’s Lessee v. Dunning. Record evidence. — Blunston’s licenses. — Improvement.—Awaurd. A judgment against cestui que trust is evidence against the trustee, in a suit brought by him — the parties being substantially the same in both sui
Morris's Lessee v. Smith
*APRIL TERM, 1792. Morris’s Lessee v. Smith. Decedent's debts. The lands of a decedent may be taken in execution on a judgment obtained against the personal representative, notwithstanding an intermediate bonA fide conveyance by the heir-at
Ross v. Rittenhouse
April Term, 1792. Ross et al. Executors versus Rittenhouse. IN this cause a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court on a case stated. After argument, the Judges recapitulated the facts and arguments of couns
Barr v. Craig
March Term, 1792. Barr versus Craig. THE circumstances of this case were as follow : Henry Banks, of Virginia, wishing to remit a sum of money to James Barr, the plaintiff, requested the defendant (then in Virginia, and to whom Banks was al
Commonwealth v. Dillon
Commonwealth v. Dillon. Confession of prisoner. A boy, about twelve years old, indicted for arson, in burning some stables containing hay, &e., had made a formal, and, to all appearance, voluntary confession to the mayor of the city of Phil
Smith v. Brodhead's Executors
Smith v. Brodhead’s Executors. Feme covert. A ferae covert gare bond to pay a debt of her husband; she was seised of a separate estate under a deed of settlement, with power to make a will; she did make a will, and in it directed the paymen
Bradley's Lessee v. Bradley
*JANUARY TERM, 1792. Bradley’s Lessee v. Agnes Bradley. New trial. Where parol evidence had been allowed to be given of the contents of a deed and of a will, without previous notice to the defendant to produce it, and it appeared, that two
Stille v. Lynch
Stille versus Lynch. This case was decided at Philadelphia, Nisi Prius, held in November 1791, before the Chief Justice, Shippen and Bradford, Justices.
Knox v. Jones
Knox et al. versus Jones., THIS was an action on the case for goods sold and delivered ; and the only question agitated upon the trial, was whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover interest? It was proved, that at the time of the sale,
Vaughan v. Blanchard
Vaughan versus Blanchard. HEATLY offered to read the return, on a commission to examine witnesses, in which it was certified, that the witnesses were duly sworn by a Justice of the Peace, and examined by the commissioners. Serjeant, objecte
Grubb's Executors v. Grubb's Executors
Grubb’s Executors, versus Grubb’s Executors. THIS cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office ; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court. But Ingersoll, on behalf of th
Walker's Appeal
Walker’s Appeal. INGERSOLL moved for the confirmation of the decree of the Orphans’ Court of Northumberland, given the 26th March, 1792, from which (as it appeared by a certificate he produced) an appeal had been entered. But the Court, fin
Respublica v. Askew
Respublica versus Askew. THE defendant was indicted for a libel; and at the last Nisi Prius, retracted his plea and submitted, protesting his innocence, &c. He now appeared to receive judgment, and his own affidavit was offered to be read i
Rapp v. Elliot
Rapp versus Elliot. THE defendant had pleaded in abatement, that the plaintiff was a feme covert: And now Howell, for the plaintiff, moved to strike off the plea, not being supported by any affidavit, as the rules of the Court require. Todd
White v. Lynch
White versus Lynch.
Jones v. Little
Jones versus Little. THE defendant’s counsel produced a certificate from a physician, stating that the defendant had been dangerously ill for three weeks last past; and thereupon moved to put off the trial. But the Court held this to be no
Lynn v. Risberg
Lynn versus Risberg. AN award was made that " an order for £550, should be given on (not mentioning the name) in whose hands, it is said, that sum was deposited by certain defendants in a former action, for the use of the plaintiff. Risberg
Haldane v. Duche's, Executors
Haldane et al. versus Duche’s, Executors. THIS was a motion for new trial, founded on a declaration made by the Court, while the merits were before the Jury, that if the counsel for the defendants could shew, that, on the evidence given, th
Henderson v. Clarkson
Henderson versus Clarkson. CASE for money had and received. Plea, non assumpsit. The action was brought to recover a sum of money, which the plaintiff claimed as agent for forty-three seamen, to whom it had been decreed in the Court of Admi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.