WHITE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, et al. v. REGESTER et al.
Syllabus
WHITE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, et al. v. REGESTER et al. No. 73-1462. Argued February 19, 1975 — Decided June 30, 1975 Elizabeth B. Levatino, Special Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs were John L. Hill, Attorney General, Larry F. York, former First Assistant Attorney General, and David M. Kendall, First Assistant Attorney General. David R. Richards argued the cause for appellees Regester et al. With him on the brief were Jack Green-berg, James M. Nabrit III, J. Phillip Crawford, Oscar H. Mauzy, Wm. Terry Bray, Sanford Jay Rosen, and George J. Korbel. Don Gladden argued the cause for appellees Escalante et al. With him on the briefs was Marvin Collins.
Full Opinion (897 characters)
Per Curiam. We are informed that the State of Texas has adopted new apportionment legislation providing single-member districts to replace the multimember districts which are at issue before us in this case. That statute by its terms does not become effective until the 1976 elections, and intervening special elections to fill vacancies, if any, will be held in the districts involved as constituted on January 1, 1975. Rather than render an unnecessary judgment on the validity of the constitutional views expressed by the District Court in this case, which we do not undertake to do at this time, we vacate the judgment of the District Court and remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of the recent Texas reapportionment legislation and for dismissal if the case is or becomes moot. So ordered. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.