Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1793 Cases
19 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eddowes v. Niell
Eddowes et al. v. Thomas Niell. Letter of credit. — Presumption of payment. Id order to render a letter of credit obligatory, it is not necessary, that it should be answered. A lapse of nineteen years, without notice of a default in payment
Zantzinger v. Ketch
Zantzinger v. Ketch. Parol evidence. Parol evidence was admitted to explain the meaning of the words “ the deed of conveyance ” in articles of agreement, as meaning a deed conveying the land, free from all incumbrances. This was an action o
Edgar's Lessee v. Robinson
*Edgar’s Lessee v. James Robinson, Jr., and William Robinson. JPa/rol evidence. Parol evidence of a deed is admissible, without a notice to produce it, as against one, not a party to the deed; nor can he be compelled to produce it, if he is
Conrad v. Conrad
Jacob Conrad v. Conrad et al., Administrators of G. Conrad. Assumpsit for work and services. Where an illegitimate son works for his father, on an express promise, that he should be put on a footing with the legitimate children, he may reco
Stansbury v. Marks
Stansbury v. Marks. Defence of infancy. In assumpsit, infancy can be given in evidence, under the general issue, but the jury may decide, whether it is a sufficient discharge. Case. Plea, non assumpsit. The defendant offered to give infancy
Bank of North America v. Pettit
* APRIL TERM, 1793. Bank of North America v. Pettit. Notice of non-payment. .Votice of non-payment of a promissory note by the maker, must be given by the holder to the indorser, with a demand of payment from him, within a reasonable time.
United States v. Ravara
April Term, 1793. Present, Wilson, Iredell and Peters, Justices. The United States versus Ravara. THE defendant, a Consul from Genoa, was indicted for a misdemeanor, in sending anonymous and threatening letters to Mr. Hammond, the British M
Upper Dublin v. Germantown
April Term, 1793. Upper Dublin versus Germantown.
Oswald v. New-York
February Term, 1793. Oswald, Administrator, versus the State of New-York. PROCLAMATION was made in this Ujjufe, “ that any perfon. having authority to appear for the State of New-Tori is required to appear accordingly j’? and noperfon appea
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm, Ex’r. Versus Georgia. T'HIS- a£Hon was militated in A'ugttfl Term, 179.2-. On' the nth of July, 1792, the Marfhall for the diftri£t of Georgia made the following return : t( Executed as within commanded, that is. to fay, ferved a
Livingston v. Swanwick
Livingston, et al. versus Swanwick. THIS was an action on the case, to recover the difference upon a stock contract, which Samuel Anderson, as the broker and agent of the defendant, who resided in Philadelphia, had entered into with the pla
Fitzgerald v. Caldwell
Fitzgerald versus Caldwell. THIS suit was instituted by the plaintiff, for the use of Moore & Johnson against Andrew Caldwell, the surviving partner of Andrew and James Caldwell. Vance, Caldwell, and Vance, had assigned to Moore & Johnson,
Fox's Lessee v. Palmer
Fox’s Lessee versus Palmer, et al. ON the trial of this ejectment, the subscribing witnesses were offered to prove, that a deed, bearing date the 1st of April, 1784, was not, in fact, executed until the month of November following. It was o
Walker v. Gibbs
WALKER et al. versus Gibbs et al. Garnishees. A FOREIGN attachment issued in the Common Pleas of Philadelphia, returnable to March Term, 1788, at the suit of the plaintiffs against Joseph Waldo, and the defendants were summoned as garnishee
Roach v. Commonwealth
Roach versus The Commonwealth. CASE. Pleas non-assumpsit and payment. The opinion of the Judges was now delivered in this cause, the facts and principles involved in it, being stated by the Chief Justice as follows.
Duncan v. Walker
Duncan versus Walker.
Barnes's Lessee v. Irwin
Barnes’s Lessee, versus Irwin, et al. THIS cause was argued upon a cafe stated, which included the following facts. The plaintiff was heir at law for one moiety of the real estate of Margaret Henderson, who died seized of the premises in qu
Respublica v. Keppele
Respublica versus Keppele. A HABEAS CORPUS was issued to bring up the body of Benjamin, a minor, about fourteen years old, who had been bound by his guardian’s consent, to the defendant, to serve her till he should arrive to the age of fift
Boyce v. Moore
January Term, 1793. Boyce versus Moore. IN this action, which was brought on a Policy of Insurance subscribed the 8th of Sept; 1786, the plaintiff declared for a total loss, and offered in evidence the protest of the captain, made at Alexan
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.