Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1796 Cases
38 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ketland v. Cassius
Ketland, qui tam. versus The Cassius. AN information that had been exhibited against the Cassius, as a vessel illegally out-fitted within the jurisdiction of the United States, came on to be argued upon a suggestion filed ex-officio by the
Wharton's Executors v. Lowrey
Wharton’s Executors versus Lowrey. BILL in Equity. The Bill was filed in October 1793, to open an account, which had been settled and signed by the complainants, in April, 1781, touching the, transactions between the testator and the defend
Ewing v. M'Nair
Ewing versus M'Nair. JUDGMENT was entered in this cause on the 1st day of September Term, 1796; and the plaintiff issued a Testatum Fi. Fa. to Allegheny County, founded on a Fi. Fa. to the sheriff of Philadelphia County, which was made retu
Greene's, Case
Greene’s, Case. GEORGE GREENE, having petitioned for a discharge under the laws for the relief of insolvent debtors, one of his creditors was offered as a witness to prove, that several judgments, had been confessed by the petitioner, witho
German v. Wainwright
German versus Wainwright.
Zantzinger v. Old
Zantzinger versus Old. A TEST ATUM Ca. Sa. had issued to the Sheriff of caster, upon which the party was arrested, and the money paid. But the Sheriff paid it over to the nominal, instead of the real, plaintiff, tho’ the indorsement for the
Stiles v. Donaldson
Stiles, Plf. in Er. versus Donaldson. WRIT of Error. To an action of Debt on a Bond, dated in August 1774, the defendant pleaded payment, and gave notice of a set-off. The cause was tried in the Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on the 19
Roberts v. Cay's Executors
Roberts versus Cay’s Executors. MANY actions were brought, returnable to January Term 1794, against the defendants, as Executors of Cay, the surviving partner of Clow and Gay, whose affairs were exceedingly deranged; and, on the 11nth of Ja
Beach v. Lee
Beach versus Lee. M. Levy for the plaintiff. Lewis for the defendant.
Respublica v. Nicholson
Respublica versus Nicholson. THIS cause had been removed by writ of Error, into the High Court of Errors and Appeals, and the judgment, being there affirmed, it was remitted to this Court. On motion of Ingersoll, for the Commonwealth, it wa
Hartshorne's Lessee v. Patton
Hartshorne’s Lessee versus Patton. THIS cause had been tried repeatedly in the city of Philadelphia ; but the Jury could not, in any instance, agree upon a verdict. Ingersoll, therefore, suggested to the Court, that in order to obtain a Jur
Barriere v. Nairac
Barriere versus Nairac. THIS was an action upon a Promissory Note, brought by the plaintiff, claiming to be indorsee of one Vuyton, against the defendant, the drawer of the note; in which the following declaration was filed. " Philadelphia
Nicholson's Lessee v. Mifflin
Nicholson’s Lessee versus Mifflin. A QUESTION arose in this case, whether the defendant had given a written authority to Edward Bonsall (a Scrivener, who kept an office for the sale of lands) to dispose of the premises in question, which th
Ruston's Executors v. Ruston
Ruston’s Executors versus Ruston. IN this action a verdict had been taken for the Plaintiffs, for £2096 13s4, subject to the opinion of the Court, on a point reserved, to be argued upon a motion for a new trial. The case was this :—Job Rust
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.