Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt · Pennsylvania 1798

Keppele v. Carr

Keppele et al. v. Carr et al. Carr et al. v. Keppele et al. Bills of exchange. — Damages. The damages on a protested bill belong to the party at whose risk it was remitted. A. & B., being indebted to C. & Sons, foreign merchants, delivered

4 U.S. 134 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · Pennsylvania 1798

Nicholson's Lessee v. Wallis

*DECEMBER TERM, 1798. Nicholson’s Lessee v. Wallis. Ejectment. — Limitation. A decision of the Board of Property was pronounced, upon a caveat, in favor of the defendant, on the 14th of February 1796: a declaration, entitled as of April ter

4 U.S. 133 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a · Pennsylvania 1798

M'Kee's Leffee v. Pfout

M'Kee’s Leffee versus Pfout. THIS was an ejectment tried at the Nifi Prius for Dauphin county in October 1795, when a verdict was given for the Leffor of the Plaintiff, fubject to the opinion of the Court, on a cafe, ftating the following f

3 U.S. 486 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a · Pennsylvania 1798

Pemberton's Leffee v. Hicks

Pemberton’s Leffee versus Hicks. THIS ejectment was tried at Newtown, in Bucks County, May, 1794, when the Jury found the following fpecial verdict: ■ “ The Jurors impannelled, tried, fworn and affirmed to try “ the iffue joined in this cau

3 U.S. 479 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a · Pennsylvania 1798

Coxe v. M'Clenachan

Coxe versus M’Clenachan. Coxe versus Huston, Special Bail. JUDGMENT having been obtained acrainft-M' Clenachan, a Ca. Sa. iflued to September Term laft, and was returned non efl inventus. The Plaintiff then iffued a fcire facias agahift ..H

3 U.S. 478 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a · Pennsylvania 1798

Camberling v. M'Call

Camberling versus M'Call. THIS caufe (fee 2 Vol. 280.) being agí . called cn the lift of arguments, the Court declared, that although they had. propofed to the Defendant’s counfel to wave the ob-jedtion to the form of bringing the action, b

3 U.S. 477 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a · Pennsylvania 1798

Respublica v. Cobret

Respublica versus Cobret. THE Defendant, being charged asa common libeller be-. fore the Chief Justice, was bou; d by recognizance fore the Chief Justice, was bou; d by recognizance to be of good behaviour, &c. and on a fjppofnim, th.-t he

3 U.S. 467 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Affirmed 1798

Wilson v. Daniel

Wilson versus Daniel. ERROR- from the Circuit Court of Virginia. , Oh the return of. the record, it appeared, that the Diftri.éb judge had endorfed the following fiat on the petition and aftlgnment of errors, prefented by the Plaintiff in e

3 U.S. 401 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Personal Injury 1798

Calder v. Wife

August Term, 1798. Calder et Wife, versus Bull et Wife. IN error from the State of Connecticut. The caufe was argued at the laft term, (in the abfence of the chief justice) and nqw the court delivered their opinions feriatim. . Chase, Jufti

3 U.S. 386 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1798

United States v. Worrall

April Term, 1798. Present, Chase and Peters, Justice's. The United States versus Worrall. THE defendant was charged with an attempt to bribe Tench Coxe, the Commissioner of the Revenue ; and the indictment, containing two counts, set forth

2 U.S. 384 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1798

Jones v. Le Tombe

Jones, Indorfee, versus Le Tombe. GAPIAS -in Cafe. This was an atftion brought, Originally, in the Supreme Court, by John Coffin Jones., a‘citizen of Maffiachufetts, as Indorfee of James Swan, againffi the JDe-fcndant, the Conful General of

3 U.S. 384 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1798

Bingham v. Cabot

Bingham, Plaintiff in Error, versus Cabot, et al. THIS a diion came again before the court, on a writ of error; and an objedtion was taken to the record, that it was not Rated, and did not appear in any part of the pr'ocefs and pleadings',

3 U.S. 382 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1798

Hollingsworth v. Virginia

Hollingsworth, et al. versus Virginia. THE decifion of the Court, in the cafe of Cbijbobn, £x’or. ' verfus Georgia, (2 Dali. Rep. 419) produced apropofi- ' verfus Georgia, (2 Dali. Rep. 419) produced apropofition in Congrefs, for amending t

3 U.S. 378 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1798

Hollingsworth v. Adams

Hollingsworth versus Adams. FOREIGN ATTACHMENT returnable to the prefent Term. The defendant was Rated to be a citizen of De-. ¿aware, in the proccfs which had iffiied; and M. Levy, having produced an affidavit in proof of that fait, moved

2 U.S. 396 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion