Find court opinions that match your case.

Dismissed 1809

Sally v. United States

SLOOP SALLY v. THE UNITED STATES. An . pppeal trto oourtd«f the Histript of ¿ase" of wimu Falty juribilietion, does not He directly to *®rt “futile wjiere the disujet e°¿ctó as ajátóícdurt, the appeal is for "the district of Massachusetts,

9 U.S. 372 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1809

United States v. Vowell & M'Clean

THE UNITED STATES v. VOWELL AND M‘CLEAN. Duties upon -goods imported, do not accrue until their' arrival at the port of entry* The duty upon salt, which ceased with the Slat of December, 1807, was not chargeable upon a cargo which arrived w

9 U.S. 368 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Bankruptcy & Debt 1809

Slacum v. Simms & Wise

SLACUM v. SIMMS AND WISE. A magistrate who has received a deed of trust from *an Insolvent debtor, ‘which deed is fraudulent in law as to creditors, is incompetent to sit as a magistrate in the discharge of the debtor under the insolvent la

9 U.S. 363 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Estate Planning & Probate 1809

Auld v. Norwood

AULD v. NORWOOD. If the owner mit herVtoPremwa ¡a the possession of ¿>d°rA ytS Without' the ffiwncr deiiven'« Set- to B.’who keep» her 4. thTpoas^ion of b. cannot «il "with"the potsessicn of U/fraudulent loan within the hlr of avuSi. nia, i

9 U.S. 361 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Estate Planning & Probate 1809

Brent v. Chapman

BRENT v. CHAPMAN. Five years’ adv.e-f iñ°n "Virginia, gives a.g9°dtitrespass Wm»y he maintained, ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, sitting at Alexandria, in an action of tres? pass brought by Chapman against Brent, ma

9 U.S. 358 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Bankruptcy & Debt 1809

Moss v. Riddle & Co.

MOSS v. RIDDLE & CO. A bond cannot be delivered to one of the obligees. as an escroto. Fraud -consists in inlen-' tion; and that intention is a-fact which must be averred in a plea of fraud. ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Co

9 U.S. 351 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1809

Owings v. Norwood's Lessee

OWINGS v. NORWOOD’S LESSEE. In an action of ejectment between two citizens of Maryland, fora tract of land in Maryland, if the defendant set up an outstanding title in a British subject which he contends is protected by the treaty» and ther

9 U.S. 344 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1809

Yeaton v. Fry

YEATON v. FRY. if the insu-' aiTrisks' ITwkculed* ports and llisa * vessel sailing ignoyiclfaded port is covered byxbep°xception is not of the Pff capture for breaking the UlOCK&UC* Copies of the proceedings in rtuy^ourt^'of Jamaica are adm

9 U.S. 335 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Dulany v. Hodgkin

DULANY v. HODGKIN. The endorsor dorses to give ul'edlt *o t}j® i8 counterseeu{¡able upon the aote, nor in an action for money^ had and received, ■ unless the plaintiff show that thg maker is insolvent, or that he' has brought' ■ suit which

9 U.S. 333 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Business & Corporate Law 1809

Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & Jamesson

RIDDLE & CO. v. MANDEVILLE AND JAMESSON. ürhe endorsee ry ;!ote™ín Virginia, may remount from t remote endorthough not 4at law. mSethat ^r' immTdia^ liable who is bie’tttiaw. Im" The remote tbe°same de! fence in equity against there-as agai

9 U.S. 322 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Welsh v. Mandeville & Jamesson

WELSH v. MANDEVILLE AND JAMESSON. Thi* court «at cáu^’to^be heard, unleu aerveil^iiiy day «before the W*y °f ** YOUNGS, for the defendant in error, objected to the hearing of the cause at this term, the citation not having been. served thir

9 U.S. 321 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1809

Himely v. Rose

HIMELY v. ROSE. it is not necésthe report o£ audlt°rs, ifthe upon the face r,?o °er" ty, ord'ered'to be re.8t°re

9 U.S. 313 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

United States v. Riddle

THE UNITED STATES v. RIDDLE. The law imintention to (ioj™“l1 ^“ rty®e' invoices. A doubt con-of » maJ be O-OOil Pl'minil good ground for seizure, and authorize ERROR to the circuit court of the district of Columbia, which had affirmed the s

9 U.S. 311 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Keene v. United States

KEENE v. THE UNITED STATES. •The trial of seizures under the act of the 18th February, 1793,. “ for enrolling and licensing ships pr vessels to be emplojed in, pie coasting-trade and fish-pries, and for (regulating the same,”'is tobe in the

9 U.S. 304 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Browne v. Strode

BROWNE AND OTHERS v. STRODE. The courts of the United. States have jurisdiction in ft case between citizens of the same state, if the plaintiffs áre only nominal plaintiffsfor the use of. an alien. THIS was a cáse certified from the circuit

9 U.S. 303 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Rodford v. Craig

RODFORD v. CRAIG. if the counsel a“ tfe^oause.Hi called, the wrr ot error will b. dismissed,

9 U.S. 289 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Logan v. Patrick

LOGAN v. PATRICK. The circuit mctioq^in1 * * a suit iii equity, '£edingJs upon A judgment at dm same ""ar tí«9,SaSthough the ^uhpoiiia the^defendant ont of- the. the court'"sits, ' THIS was a case certified from the circuit court f°r the 7t

9 U.S. 288 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Rush v. Parker

RUSH v. PARKER. Thiscowtwill vits as to tlK? ™ftier.1n ais* pute. ERROR to the circuit court of the district of Mary land, in an action of replevin. I. P. Boyd., for the defendant in error, contended, that the replevin bond being in the pen

9 U.S. 287 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

United States v. Potts

THE UNITED STATES v. POTTS AND OTHERS. turned the edge," are not liable to duties, altho’ imported elimination raised tot-toms.” THIS was a case certified from the circuit court for the district of Maryland. The question upon which the iudg

9 U.S. 284 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1809

Yeaton v. United States

YEATON AND OTHERS, CLAIMANTS OF THE SCHOONER GENERAL PINKNEY AND CARGO, v. THE UNITED STATES. r9 admiral# °(gSjS>8„snea§3 the sentence.' altogether ¡ . i3t0 be heard »» the appel0°”teñce had been pron°ifnc^¿ Iaw under -which the sentence of

9 U.S. 281 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1809

United States v. Evans

THE UNITED STATES v. EVANS. it is not a ground for a •writ of error that the judge to'reinstau^a cause after nonsmL ERRQK to the district court for the Kentucky ,. . ^ district, ?n the court below, the judge at the trial rejected certain te

9 U.S. 280 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1809

Hepburn & Dundas v. Auld

HEPBURN and DUNDAS, plaintiffs in error, v. COLIN AULD, defendants in error; and HEPBURN and DUNDAS, appellants, v. COLIN AULD, appellee. posseSou^m severalty a tillon may1'be presumed. In equity, dispensed with if it be not of the, contrac

9 U.S. 262 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Tax Law 1809

United States v. Patterson

THE UNITED STATES v. JOHN ARTHUR AND ROBERT PATTERSON. The want of oyer of the. cundition of a I bond in plea ofperformance is fata). Upon demurrer, the judgment of the court must be against theparty 1 who commits the first error. ERROR to

9 U.S. 257 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1809

Taylor & Quarles v. Brown

TAYLOR AND QUARLES v. BROWN. The first surwrwr tender a military land warrant in V irginia, gives the prior equity. The survey is ihe act appropriation. The certificate of survey is sufficient ideiu-ethat the warrant whs in •the han-i» dr t

9 U.S. 234 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion