Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1810 Cases
38 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Scott v. Ben
SCOTT v. NEGRO BEN. The right to freedom, under the act of Maryland which prohibits the bringing of. slaves into.that stale, is not acquiiyd by the neglect of the master to prove to the satisfaction of the naval affa. cer, or collector of t
Brigantine Amiable Lucy v. United States
THE BRIGANTINE AMIABLE LUCY v. THE UNITED STATES. The act of congress of the 28th of February, 1803, to prevent the importation of certain persons into certain states, where by the laws thereof, their admission is prohibited, is not in forc
Schooner Rachel v. United States
THE SCHOONER RACHEL v. THE UNITED STATES. No sentence of condemnation can be affirmed if the law under which the forfeiture accrued has expired, although a condemnation and sale had taken place, and the money had been paid over tto the Unit
Schooner Juliana v. United States
THE SCHOONER JULIANA v. THE UNITED STATES; and THE SHIP ALLIGATOR v. THE UNITED STATES. It was no offence against the embargo law of take goods out of one vessel and put them into another in the port of Baltimore, unless it be with an inten
Tyler v. Tuel
TYLER AND OTHERS v. TUEL. An assignee of part of a patent right cannot maintain an action on the case for a violation of the patent. THIS was a case certified from the circuit court of the district of Vermont, Tyler. and others, as assignee
Skillern's Executors v. May's Executors
SKILLERN’S EXECUTORS v. MAY’S EXECUTORS. It is too late to question the jurisdiction of the circuit court after the cause has been sent back by mandate. •THIS was a case certified from the circuit court for the district of Kentucky, the jud
De Butts v. Bacon
DE BUTTS v. BACON AND OTHERS. If an agent, who has, by permission of his principal, sold 8 per cent. stock, applies the money to his o,wn use, and being pressed for payment gives ii mortgage to secure the repayment of the amount of the stoc
Lodge's Lessee v. Lee
LODGE’S LESSEE v. LEE. A grant of an island by name, in the Potomac river, super adding the courses and distances of the lines thereof, which on resurvey are now found to exclude part of teh island, will pass the whole island. EJECTMENT by
United States v. Ship Helen
THE UNITED STATES v. SHIP HELEN. A vessel having violated a law of the United States, cannot be seiazed for such violation, after the law has expired, unless some special provision be made be made therefor by statute. THIS, was an appeal fr
Atkinson v. Mutual Assurance Society
ATKINSON v. THE MUTUAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY AGAINST FIRE, ON BUILDINGS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. The additional premion upon a revaluation under the rules of the society, in only upon the excess. THIS case differed from the case of Korn & Wise
Korn & Wisemiller v. Mutual Assurance Society
KORN AND WISEMILLER v. THE MUTUAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY AGAINST FIRE ON BUILDINGS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. The separation of Alexandria from Virginia did not affect existing contracts between individuals. The insurance upon buildings in Alexan
Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & Jamesson
RIDDLE AND COMPANY v. MANDEVILLE AND JAMESSON. The court below upon a mandate on reversal of its judgment may award execution for the costs of the appellant in that court. Nothing having been said respecting the costs, the court below had .
Ex parte Wilson
WILSON, EX PARTE. The writ of habeas corpus ad subjicien dum does not lie to bring up a person confined in the prison bounds upon a ca sa issued in a civil suit. WILSON petitioned the , court for a writ of haheas corpus, and a certiorari to
Young v. Grundy
YOUNG v. GRUNDY. No writ of error or appeallies to an injunction. if the answer neither admits ^legations of v™d on the Inai hearing; but ot'°1
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.