Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a 1812

United States v. Crosby

THE UNITED STATES v. JONAH CROSBY. The titieto land can be acquired and lost only in the htóniaér. prescribed by thé law o£ jj place where-. s.uch lani * s,t'4ate'

11 U.S. 115 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Business & Corporate Law 1812

Maryland Insurance v. Roy

MARYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY v. LE ROY, BAYARD & M'EVERS. Msent.,..Marshall, chief justice. The discharge omtheiiliability, in fiase of taking go, not authopoUcy%e-e pends) not on any supposed increase of risk, but whoiiy oñ the de■Fnañre'd f

11 U.S. 26 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1812

Cargo v. United States

SCHOONER PAULINA’S CARGO v. THE UNITED STATES. Absent.."Washington, justice. c, ,. J thg a^ of congress of the whichy> prohihited the Sent of goods from one8vea^dnoUmiudf’ the case óí'» vessel lading meáníó?r¡vei' jcraft, &c. congress ot th

11 U.S. 52 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

Whelan v. United States

WHELAN v. THE UNITED STATES. Case, of aeiters^avPaWe" from thlsea, by vessels of ientons tar-then for breach civil cases ¿f admiralty; and riStíon/and are to be tried “t^^-Jy THIS cause standing so late on the docket that it was hot-likely

11 U.S. 112 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

Hawthorne v. United States

HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES. Present....Ml the Judges. . This Court take new evidence to be . used here, m mSty0Jurisdiction, THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the District. Court, át New Or

11 U.S. 107 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Insurance Law 1812

Wells v. U. States

BRIG JAMES WELLS v THE U. STATES. Msent..,.Marshall, chief justice, In eases of admiralty juriseridence'wiii be admitted iñ forAatpur"d pose acommission may issue, yhe evidence of that nebestion of the. toSS°yeiy clear and pos•ltive- THIS w

11 U.S. 22 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Business & Corporate Law 1812

Fitzsimmons v. Ogden

FITZSIMMONS & Others v. OGDEN & Others. [Present....Jttbges Washington, Livingston, Tobb, Dúvaíb & Story.] jjew¡)oh equS equUy, ntóy acquire • so as to protect his equity. THIS was an appeal from the decree of the Cir-c«it Court for the dis

11 U.S. 2 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1812

Shirras v. Mitchel

ALEXANDER SHIRRAS, JOHN BLACK, WILLIAM MILLIGAN, WILLIAM BLACKLOCK & JOSEPH VERREES, v. JOHN CAIG & ROBERT MITCHEL. Msent....Washington, justice jan^made6by one who has a ieg.-u and e fróm/the heiTthel-esiáue of the ieestate in the” !fnncId

11 U.S. 34 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

Catherine v. U. States

SCHOONER CATHERINE v. THE U. STATES. . Absent....Washington,justice. If the counsel j^tne^S to theSatementof the points qf the case, the dumped?1

11 U.S. 99 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

United States v. Hudson

THE UNITED STATES v. HUDSON AND GOODWIN Absent.... Washi ngton, justice. The courts of the I?. States have no common law jurisdiction in cases of libel against the government of the United States. But they have the power to fine for con-tem

11 U.S. 32 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

Hudson & Smith Guestier

HUDSON & SMITH GUESTIER. [ Judges present...~Wa shington, _ Livingston, Todd, Duvaiu, & Story.] This court Aausé after the term ''** ON the first day of the term, Harper moved for, .and obtained a rule to show cause why this case, which was

11 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

United States v. Tyler

UNITED STATES v. JOHN TYLER. Upon an indictment for putting goods on board a car- • riage, with in- • tent to transport them out of the United States contrary to the act of Jan. 9, 1809, the punishment of which offence is a fine of four tim

11 U.S. 285 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1812

Freeland v. Heron, Lenox & Co.

ARCHIBALD FREELAND v. HERON, LENOX AND COMPANY. mneBt°sent by a foreign merchant toa merchant in this country & not objected to fortw0year8j is deemed an account stated, * 8c/ throws the burden of «proof upoi). him. who rep ceivcd 8c tept i

11 U.S. 147 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1812

United States v. Goodwin

THE UNITED STATES v. JOHN GOODWIN. pro writ Of error.iies to the Court ofth UñHedStoteá, to reverso the • in a civil ac-ferried*5 ub to the cirouit 0ourt from the Uistíourt, by wit of error. THIS was an action of debt brought originally in

11 U.S. 108 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion