Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1827 Cases
47 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mason v. Matilda
[Local Law.] Mason and Another, Plaintiffs in Error, against Matilda and Others, Defendants in Error. On the construction of the statute of Virginia, emancipating slaves brought into that .State in 1792, unless the owner removing with them
Williamson v. Daniel
[Devise.] Williamson and Others, Appellants, against Daniel and Others, Respondents. An absolute bequest of certain slaves to P. H. is qualified by a subse- • quent limitation over, that if either of the testator’s grand children, P. H., or
United States v. Gooding
(Slave Trade Acts. Evidence. Pleading.} The United States against Gooding. Upon an indictment under the Slave Trade Act of the 20th oi April, 1818, eh. 373. against the owner of the ship, testimony of. the declarations of the master, being
The Antelope
[Practice.] The Antelope. The Spanish and Portuguese Consuls, Claimants. Further explanation of the decree of this Court, in S. C., ante Vol, X. p. 66, and vol. XL p. 413. The Africans captured, except those restored to the Spanish claimant
United States v. 350 Chests of Tea
[Construction op Statute. Jurisdiction.} The United States against 350 Chests of Tea. Lippincott and Others, Claimants. The term “ concealed,” as used in the 63th section of the Duty Act of the ¡2d of March, 1799, ch.128. applies only to ar
Post Master General v. Early
[Constitutional Law.] The Post Master General of the United States against Early and Others. The Circuit Courts of the Union have jurisdiction, under the constitution, and the acts of April 30th, 1810, ch. 202. s. 29., and of March 3d, 1815
De la Croix v. Chamberlain
[Local Law.] De la Croix against Chamberlain. A concession of lands made by the Spanish authorities ht Mobile in the year .18*6, cannot be given in evidence.ro support an ejectment in the Courts of the United States, the same not having bee
Newman v. Jackson
[Sai.is.Ü Newman, Plaintiff in Error, against Jackson, Defendant in Error. Question as to the sufficiency of a notice of sale of real property under a deed of trust. Vo particular form of such a notice is prescribed by law;- it is'sufficien
United States v. Marchant
[Practice.] The United States against Marchant & Colson. Wherte two or more persons are jointly charged in the same indictment with a capital offence, they have not a right, by law, to be tried separately, without the consent of the prosecu
Brown v. Maryland
[Constitutional Law.'J Brown and Others, Plaintiffs in Error, against The State of Maryland, Defendant in Error. An act of a State legislature, requiring all importers of foreign-goods by the bale or package, &c. and other persons selling t
General Interest Insurance v. Ruggles
[Insurance.] The General Interest Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error, against Ruggles, Defendant in Error. Where an insurance was effected after a.loss had happened, though unknown to the assured, the master having omitted to communicat
Drummond v. Executors of Prestman
[Guarantie. — Evidence.] Richard Drummond, surviving partner of Charles Drummond, against the Executors of George Prestman. The following letter of guarantie, “ Baltimore, 17th Nov. 1303. “ Capt. Charles Drummond, “Dear Sir: — My son Willia
Columbian Insurance v. Catlett
[Insurance.] The Columbian Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error, against Catlett, Defendant in Error. A policy for 10,000 dollars, upon a voyage “ at and from Alexandria to St. Thomas, and two other ports in the West Indies, and back ' to
Henderson v. Poindexter's Lessee
[Construction op Treaty. Local Law.J Henderson, Plaintiff in Error, against Poindexter’s Lessee, Defendant in Error. Spanish grants, made after the treaty of peace of 1782, between the United States and Great Britain, within the territory e
United States v. Nicholl
[Surety.] The United States against Nicholl. The act of May 15th, 1820, ch. 625. s. 2., which requires new sureties to be given by certain public officers on or before the 30th of September, 1820, does not expressly, or by implication, disc
Harcourt v. Gaillard
'[Construction oftreatv. Local law.] Harcourt and others against Gaillard and others. A grant made by the British governor of Florida, after the de-. claration of independence within the territory lying between the Mississippi and the Chata
Ramsay v. Allegre
[Admiralty Jdrisdictiok.I Ramsay against Allegre. Q'lttere, Whether a suit in personam in the Admiralty may be maintained against the ruvner of a ship by material men furnishing supplies fpr the ship In her home port, where the local law gi
United States v. Tillotson
[Practice.; The United States against Tillotson and another. Where the burthen of proof of certain specific defences set up by the defendant is on him, and the evidence presents contested facts, an absolute direction from the Court, that th
Thompson v. Peter
[Limitation.] Thompson against Peter & Johns, Administrators de bonis non of Peter, deceased. An acknowledgment of the debt by the- personal representatives of the original debtor, deceased, will not take the case out of the statute of limi
Montgomery v. Hernandez
[Constitutional Law. Construction of Statute,] Montgomery, Plaintiff in Error, against Hernandez and Others, Defendants in Error. Under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20., this Court has no appellate jurisdiction from th
President of the Bank v. Dandridge
[Corporations,] The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States, against Dandridge and Others. In a suit brought by the President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States, upon a bond given to the .bank
M'Connell v. Trustees of Lexington
[Local Law.} M'Connell against The Trustees of the Town of Lexington. A question in equity as to the title to a lot ofland in the town of Lex- ' ington, Kentucky, reserved as public property, and claimed as having been appropriated by the p
Armstrong v. Lear
[Lex Loci. Probate or Testamentary Paper.'] Armstrong against Lear, Administrator (with the will annexed) of Kosciuszko. -A testamentary paper executed in a foreign country, even if executed so as to give it the effect of a last will and te
M'Lemore v. Powell
[Bill of Exchange. Suret r. j M'Lemore, Plaintiff in Error, against Powell and others, Defendants in Error. An agreement between the creditor and principal debtor for delay, or otherwise changing the nature of the contract to the prejudice
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.