Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1830 Cases
59 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Providence Bank v. Billings
The Providence Bank, Plaintiffs in Error vs. Alpheus Billings and Thomas G. Pittman. In 1791 the legislature-of Rhode Island granted a charter of incorporation to certain individuals who had associated for the purpose of banking.. They were
Soulard v. United States
Julie Soulard, Widow, and others, Appellants vs. The United States. John T. Smith, Appellant vs. The United States. In the treaty by which Louisiana was acquired, the United States stipulated that the inhabitants of the ceded territory shou
Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of Pawlet
The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts Plaintiffs vs. The Town of Pawlet and Ozias Clarke. Ejectment to recove! a lot of land, being the first division lot laid out to the right of the society in the town of Pawlet.
Hollingsworth v. Barbour
Henry Hollingsworth, Heir of Levi Hollingsworth, Appellant vs. Philip Barbour and others, Appellees. H.- entered, with the proper surveyor for the'district of Kentucky,"-forty-five . thousand acres of land, in the county of Washington in th
Craig v. Missouri
Hiram Craig, John Moore and Ephraim Moore vs. The State of Missouri. On the 27th day of June 1821, the legislature of the state of Missouri passed an act, entitled “ an act for the establishment ofloanoffices;” by the third section of which
Spratt v. Spratt
Sarah Spratt, Administratrix of James Spratt, Appellant, vs. Thomas Spratt, Appellee. The second section of the act of. congress to establish an uniform system of naturalization,” passed in 1802, requires, that every person desirous of. bei
Saunders v. Gould
Oliver Saunders, Plaintiff in Error vs. Benjamin Gould. Where the whole cause, and not a point or points in the cause, has been adjourned from the circuit court to this court, the case will be remande.d to the circuit court. The case was' a
Bank of the United States v. Tyler
The Bank of The United States, Plaintiffs in Error vs. Levi Tyler, Defendant in Error. Action by the indorsees against the indorser of a promissory note, drawn and indorsed in the state of Kentucky. The statute of Kentucky authorising the a
Ronkendorff v. Taylor's Lessee
Mary Ronkendorff, Plaintiff in Error vs. James N. Taylor’s Lessee, Defendant in Error The official fax books of (he corporation of Washington, made up by the register from the original returns ór lists of the assessors laid before the court
Galt v. Galloway
William T. Galt and others, Appellants vs. James Galloway, Jun. and Others, Appellees. The possession of a warrant has always .been considered at the land office in Ohio sufficient authority to make locations under it. Letters of attorney w
King v. Hamilton
John W. King and others, Appellants vs. James Hamilton, James Stricker and Frances his Wife, Hezekiah Fulkse, Abraham Hancy and John Hopkins, Appellees. The complainants, in the circuit court of Ohio, filed a bill to enforce the specific pe
Conard v. Nicoll
John Conard, Marshal of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff in Error vs. Francis H. Nicoll, Defendant in Error. The principles decided in the case of Conard vs. The Atlantic Insurance Company, relative to the priority of the Uni
Lagrange v. Chouteau
Francis Lagrange, alias Isidore, a Man of Colour, Plaintiff in Error vs. Pierre Chouteau, Jun. After the decision of the case in the supreme court of the state of Missouri, the plaintiff presented a petition for a rehearing, claiming bis fr
Van Ness v. Mayor of Washington
John P. Van Ness, and Marcia his Wife, Complainants, Appellants vs. The Mayor, Aldermen, and Board of Common Council of the City of Washington, and the United States of America, Defendants. In 1822 congress passed an act authorising the cor
Lloyd v. Scott
John Lloyd, Plaintiff in Error vs. Charles Scott, Bailiff of William S. Moore, Defendant. S. being seised in fee of four brick - tenements and lots of grouhd in Alexandria, in consideration of five thousand dollars, granted to M. an annuity
Caldwell v. Taggart
James Caldwell, Appellant vs. John Taggart and Mary his wife, and others. Where a bill was filed to compel the execution of securities for money loaned, which.securities, it was alleged in the bill, were promised to be given upon particular
Bartle v. Nutt
Adam Bartle vs. William D. Nutt, Administrator of George Coleman. A contract was made for rebuilding fort- Washington, by M. a public agent, and a deputy quartermaster general, with B'.; in the profits of which M. was to participate. False
Wilcox v. Executors of Plummer
John V. Wilcox and Thomas Wilcox vs. The Executors of Kemp Plummer. Action of assumpsit to recover from the defendant, in the character of an attorney at law, the amount of a loss sustained by reason of neglect or unskilful conduct. A promi
Beaty v. Lessee of Knowler
John Beaty, Plaintiff in Error vs. The Lessee of A. Knowler and others, Defendant in Error. Ejectment. The defendant claimed the land in controversy under a tax sale, which was made by a company incorporated by the legislature of Connecticu
Harris v. D'Wolf
Samuel D. Harris, Marshal of the United States for the District of Massachusetts, Plaintiff in Error vs. James D’Wolf, Jun. Defendant in Error. The plaintiff in replevin, James D’Wolf, claimed the merchandize under an assignment executed by
Columbian Insurance v. Ashby
The Columbian Insurance Company of Alexandria, Plaintiffs in Error vs. Ashby and Stribling, Defendants. Action on a policy of instance on the brig Hope, from Alexandria to Barbadoes, and back to the United States. On the outward voyage, the
United States v. Morrison
The United States, Appellants vs. John Morrison and others, Appellees. There is no statute in Virginia which expressly makes a-judgment a lien upon the lands of the debtor. As in England the lien is the consequenee of a right to take out an
Boyce & Henry v. Edwards
Boyce and Henry, Plaintiffs in Error vs. Timothy Edwards, Defendant in Error. Action on two bills of exchange drawn by Hutchinson, on B. and H. in favour of E. which the drawers, B. and H. refused to accept, and with the amount’ of which bi
Ex Parte Tillinghast
Ex Parte John L. Tillinghast, Esquire. -That a counsellor-practising In the highest court of the state of -New York, in which he resides, had been struck off from the roil of counsellors of the dis- . trict court of the United States for th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.