Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a 1834

United States v. Jones

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. Walter Jones, administrator de bonis non of Benjamin G. Orr. The cas.e was argued by Mr Butler, attorney-general, for the United States; and by Mr Coxe and Mr Jones, for the defendant. Mr Coxe and M

33 U.S. 387 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

United States v. Jones

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. Walter Jones, administrator of Benjamin G. Orr. The case was argued by Mr Butler, attorney-general, for, the United States; and by Mr Coxe find Mr Jones, for the defendant.

33 U.S. 375 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Bank of the United States v. Donnally

The Bank of the United States, plaintiff in error v. Andrew Donnally, defendant in error. The case was argued by Mr Hardin and Mr Sergeant, for the plaintiff in error ; and by Mr Ewing and Mr Binney, for the defendant. By Mr Hardin, for the

33 U.S. 361 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

Withers v. Withers

Reuben Withers, appellant v. John Withers, appellee. The case was argued by Mr Neal, for the appellant; and by Mr Key, for the appellee. Mr Key, contra:

33 U.S. 355 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

King v. Mitchell

William King, appellant v. John Mitchell et al., appellees. The case was argued by Mr Webster and Mr Jones, for the appellants; and by Mr Coxe, for the appellees. Mr Webster, for the appellant. Mr Coxe, for the appellees. Mr Jones, in reply

33 U.S. 326 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1834

Davis v. Packard

Charles A. Davis, consul of the king of Saxony, plaintiff in error v. Isaac Packard, Henry Disdier and William Morphy. The case was argued by Mr White, for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr Selden, for the defendants. Mr White stated, Mr Se

33 U.S. 312 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Keene v. M'Donough

Richard R. Keene, plaintiff in error v. John M’Donough. This case was argued by Mr Grimes, for the defendant. No counsel appeared for the plaintiff in error.

33 U.S. 308 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Mitchell v. United States

Colin Mitchell, appellant v. The United States.

33 U.S. 307 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1834

Life & Fire Insurance v. Adams

In the matter of the Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York, plaintiff v. Christopher Adams.

33 U.S. 306 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Insurance Law 1834

Life & Fire Insurance v. Heirs of Wilson

In the matter of the Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York, plaintiffs v. The Heirs of Nicholas Wilson. The case was argued by Mr Selden and Mr Jones, for the plaintiffsand by Mr Coxe and Mr Porter, for the defendants. Mr Coxe and Mr

33 U.S. 291 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1834

United States v. Randenbush

The United States v. Adam Randenbush. The caseicas argued by the Attorney-General for the United States. No counsel appeared for the defendant.

33 U.S. 288 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Mumma v. Potomac Co.

Jacob Mumma, plaintiff in error v. The Potomac Company. The case was argued by Mr Brent and Mr Tabbs, for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr Jones and Mr Coxe, for the defendants.

33 U.S. 281 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

United States v. One hundred & twelve Casks of Sugar

The United States, appellants v. One hundred and twelve Casks of Sugar, Nathan Goodale claimant. This case was presented to the court on printed statements and arguments, by Mr Butler, attorney-general, for the appellants.

33 U.S. 277 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

United States v. Hack

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. Andrew Hack, Thomas Sewall, and James Wilkes, Jun., assignees of John Stouffer. For the United States, the Attorney-General contended,

33 U.S. 271 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

Bank of the United States v. White

The Bank of the United States, Appellants v. Jacob White, David Cummins, and Robert Bennefil. Mr Sergeant, also, for the appellants, Mr Hammond, for the appellees.

33 U.S. 262 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Union Bank

The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, plaintiff in error v. The Union Bank of Georgetown. This case was argued by Mr Coxe and Mr Swann, for the plaintiffs in error; and by Mr Key, for the defendant.

33 U.S. 259 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

Mandeville v. Burt

Joseph Mandeville and others, appellants v. Roderick Burt, complainant. Same Appellants v. J. and W. Southgate, complainants. Same Appellants v. William Neale, administrator of Francis Keene, complainant. Same Appellants v. Alexander Sangst

33 U.S. 256 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

Gregg ex rel. Craig v. Lessee of Sayre

Sydney Gregg, by N. B. Craig her committee, plaintiff in error v. The Lessee of Gabriel Sayre and Wife. This case was submitted to the court, upon printed arguments, by Mr Watts for the plaintiff, in error, and Mr Fetterman for the defendan

33 U.S. 244 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

M'Cutchen v. Marshall

James M’Cutchen and others, appellants v. James Marshall and others. The case was submitted to the court on printed arguments, by Mr Benton, with whom were MrWashington and Mr Yerger, for the appellants ; and Mr White, for the appellees, Mr

33 U.S. 220 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

Lessee of Binney v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.

Lessee of Amos Binney, plaintiff in error v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company. The case was argued by Mr Key and Mr Jones, for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr Coxe and Mr Swann, for the defendants. Mr Swann and Mr Coxe, for the defen

33 U.S. 214 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Binney v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.

Amos Binney, appellant v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company. The case was argued by Mr Key and Mr Webster, for the appellant; and by Mr Swann and Mr Coxe, for the appellees. .

33 U.S. 201 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1834

Robinson v. Noble's Administrators

William Robinson, Jun., plaintiff in error v. William Noble’s Administrators. The case was submitted to the court on printed arguments, by Mr Watts, for the plaintiff.in error; and by Mr Fetterman and Mr Colwell, for the defendants. . Mr Wa

33 U.S. 181 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

Lutz v. Linthicum

John Lutz, plaintiff in error v. Otho M. Linthicum. The case was argued by Mr Key, for the- plaintiff in error; and by Mr Marbury and Mr Coxé, for the defendant. Mr Key contended, Mr Marbury and Mr Coxe, for the defendant.

33 U.S. 165 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1834

States v. Ringgold

United States, plaintiffs in error v. Tench Ringgold. The case was argued by Mr Butler, attorney-general, for the United States; and by Coxe, for the defendant. Mr Coxe, for the defendant,

33 U.S. 150 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion