Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1835 Cases
41 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mitchel v. United States
Colin Mitchel, Robert Mitchel, in his own right, and as assignee of the estate and effects of the mercantile house heretofore trading under, the firm of Carnochan and Mitchel, and as trustee of the creditors of said firm, and also of Richar
Ex parte Milburn
Ex parte George Milburn. Habeas corpus. As the jurisdiction of the supreme court'is appellate, it must be shown to the court, that the court has the power to award a habeas corpus before one, will be granted. , George Milburn was imprisoned
Urtetiqui v. D'Arcy
Domingo Urtetiqui, plaintiff in error v. John N. D’Arcy, Henry Didier and Domingo D’Arbel, defendants in error. JVlaryland. The plaintiffs instituted a suit in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Maryland, stating the
United States v. Brig Burdett
The United States, appellants v. The Brig Burdett. Maryland. An information was filed in the district court of the United States on the 1st of October 1832 against, the Brig Burdett, alleging her to have been forfeited to the United States,
Winn v. Patterson
Elisha Winn and others, plaintiffs in error v. William Patterson. Georgia. Ejectment for a tract of land in Franklin county, Georgia, held • under a.grant to Basil Jones, and conveyed by the attorney of Basil Jones to the. defendant in erro
Livingston v. Story
Edward Livingston, appellant v. Benjamin Story. •Louisiana.' A bill of complaint was filed in the district court of the United States, for the eastern district of Louisiana, to set asidé a conveyance-made by the complainant of certain lots
Owings v. Hull
Charlotte Dye Owings and Frances T. D. Owings, plaintiffs in error v. James F. Hull. Mrs Van Pradelles being in New Orleans, and about to ss.il for Baltimore, made, ■her last will and testament, and appointed her sisters residing in Baltimo
Life & Fire Insurance v. Adams
The Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Christopher Adams. Louisiana. Mandamus. In the district court of the United'States, for the d¡strict of Louisiana, the district judge refused to extonda judgment previously . entered in the
Life & Fire Insurance v. Adams
The Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Christopher Adams. Louisiana. Mandamus. Although no rule to show causé why'a mandamus ■ should not issue to the district judge of Louisiana had been granted-by the ■ court; the district jud
Chesapeake v. Knapp
The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, plaintiffs in error v. Abraham Knapp and others. ' District of Columbia. An action of indebitatus assumpsit was instituted to recover a large sum of money, alleged to be due for the. construction of ce
Harrison v. Nixon
George Harrison, Thomas H. White and others, appellants v. Henry Nixon, surviving executor of Matthias Aspden, deceased. A bill was filed in the circuit court of the United States, for the district of Pennsylvania, stating that one Matthias
Fenwick v. Chapman
Robert Fenwick, plaintiff in error v. Eliza Chapman and Robert Chapman, by Kitty Chapman their mother and next friend, defendants in error. By the statute of Maryland of1796, ch. 67, s. 13; manumissions of slaves, by will' and testament, ma
Scott v. Lloyd
Charles Scott, bailiff of William S. Moore, plaintiff in error v. John Lloyd. Scholfield applied to Moore to raise or borrow 5000 dollars, securing him on an annuity, or ground rent, on sufficient real estate, for one year. Moore . proposed
Piatt v. Vattier
Robert Piatt, appellant v. Charles Vattier and others, and the Bank of the United States. A bill was filed in the circuit court of Ohio, for a conveyance of the legal title to certain real estate in the city of Cincinnati; and the statute o
Bank of United States v. Waggener
The Bank of the United States, plaintiffs in error v. Herbert G. Waggener, George Wagley and Alexander Miller. The office of the Bank of the United Stales at Lexington, Kentucky, in February 1822,. held a large amount of notes of the Bank o
Beers v. Haughton
Joseph D. Beers, William L. Booth and Isaac R. St John, plaintiffs in error v. Richard Haughton. Ohio. In Jane 1830, Beers et al. brought an action of assumpsit in the circuit Court of Ohio against J. Harris and C. Harris, and obtained judg
United States v. Robeson
The United States, plaintiffs in error v. William L. Robeson. Louisiana-. An action was instituted on a treasury transcript for the recovery of the balance stated to be due to the United States, by the defendant, as assistant deputy quarter
Beard v. Rowan
Henry Beard, William A. Beard, Lewis Hawkins and Mary his wife v. John Rowan. Kentucky. The clauses in the will of John Campbell, under-which the land in controversy was claimed, were as follows : “ and if within that time, my said half bro
Greenleaf v. Birth
James Greenleaf, plaintiff in error v. James Birth. Where there is no evidence tending to prove a particular fact, the court are bound so to instruct the jury when requested; but they cannot legally give any instruction which shall take fro
Boyce's Executors v. Grundy
James Boyce’s Executors, appellants v. Felix Grundy. On the hearing- of the case of Boyce’s Executors y. Grundy, at January term 1830, on an appeal from the decree of the circuit court of west Tennessee, 3 Peters 210, the decree of the circ
United States v. Bailey
United States v. John Bailey. Kentucky. * Indictment upon the act of congress of March 3d 1823, for the punishment of frauds committed against the government of the United States. After the whole case had been laid before the circuit'court
United States v. Bailey
The United States, plaintiff v. John Bailey. Kentucky. Indictment for false swearing, under the third section of the act of congress of March 1,1823, which declares that “ any person who shall .. swear or affirm falsely, touching- the expen
Mayor of New Orleans v. De Armas
The Mayor, Aldermen, and Inhabitants of the City of New Orleans, plaintiffs in error v. Christoval G. De Armas, and Manuel Simon Cucullu. Louisiana. A lot of ground situated in the city of New Orleans, which was ■ occupied, under an incompl
King's Heirs v. Thompson
George King’s Heirs, Raphael Semmes and others, appellants v. Josiah Thompson and Elizabeth his wife. District of Columbia. A few days atter the marriage of J. Thompson; with the daughter of George King,’in 1812, the latter residing in Geor
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.