Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1841 Cases
31 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Libellants & Claimants of the Schooner Amistad
The United States, Appellants, v. The Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad, her Tackle, Apparel, and Furniture, together with her Cargo, and the Africans mentioned and described in the several Libels and Claims, Appellees. The S
Groves v. Slaughter
Moses Groves and James Graham, Plaintiffs in error, v. Robert Slaughter, Defendant in error. John W. Brown, Moses Groves, R. M. Roberts, and James Graham, Plaintiffs in error, v. Robert Slaughter, Defendant in error. An action was institute
Minis v. United States
Philip Minis, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States, Defendants in error. Dr. Minis, a surgeon in the seryice of the aimy of the United States, was 'appointed a military'disbursing agent for removing and Subsisting the Cherokee Indians.
United States v. Fitzgerald
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. John Fitzgerald and Hipolite Fitzgerald, Defendants in error. John Fitzgerald had been appointed, in 1833, Inspector of the CuBtdms for the District of Mississippi; and by the Collector at New Orle
United States v. Bank of the Metropolis
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Bank of the Metropolis, Defendant in error. The United States instituted a suit against the Bank of the IVIetropoIis, claiming twenty-se"en thousand eight hundred and eighty-one dollars and fif
Gratiot v. United States
Charles Gratiot, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States, Defendants in error. The United States instituted a suit against Charles Gratiot to recover a balance alleged to be due by him for money paid to him as “ Chief Engineer in the servi
United States v. Delespine
The United States, Appellants, v. Joseph Delespine, Appellee. A grant by the Spanish authorities was made of ninety-two thousand one hundred and sixty acres of land at New river, in Florida, in 1813, afterwards the grantee de- . termined to
United States v. Linn
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. William Linn and others, Defendants in error. The United States instituted an action of debt against the defendant, William Linn, and his sureties, to recover a sum-of money in the hands of Linn, h
Young v. Smith
Jane Young, and others, Legatees of John Parks, deceased, Appellants, v. Edward L. Smith, and Henry N. Allen, executors of the last will and testament of John Parks, deceased. A bill was filed by residuary legatees claiming to receive-from
Gwin v. Breedlove
William M. Gwin, Marshal of the Southern District of Mississippi, Plaintiff in error, v. James H. Breedlove, Defendant in error. A case, on a writ of error to the Southern District of Mississippi, was docketed and dismissed on the 9th of Fe
O'Hara v. United States
Oliver O’Hara and others, Appellants, v. The United States, Appellees. A claim for land in East Florida, granted by Governor White to Daniel O’Hara, rejected by the Superior Court of East Florida, and the decree of that Court affirmed. Gove
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants, v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts The state of Rhode Island filed a bill against , the commonwealth of Massachusetts, claiming that the houndary . between the two states
United States v. Heirs of Delespine
The United States, Appellants, v. The Heirs of Joseph Delespine and others, Appellees. A claim for-a square of four miles of land, under a grant from Don Jose Coppinger, Spanish Governor of East Florida, situated at' the north head of India
Buyck v. United States
Ann Buyck, widow of Don Augustin Buyck, deceased, and the unknown heirs of said Buyck, Appellants, v. The United States, Appellees. The decree of the Superior Court of East Florida, by which a.grant for fifty thousand acres of land, made by
Lea v. Kelly
Martin A. Lea, Monroe Rabetaille, and Charles G. Langdon, Appellants v. Enoch S. Kelly, Appellee. A judgment was entered on a promissory note drawn by Kelly and others in favour of Lea and others, in the Circuit Court of Alabama. Afterwards
Amis v. Pearle
Amis v. Pearle. Motion by the counsel of the defendant, to docket and dismiss a case in which a writ . of error had been sued out of the Circuit Court, the plaintiff in error- having failed to 'file the- writ of error in the Supreme Court,
United States v. Boyd
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. Gordon D. Boyd, and others, Defendants in error. The United States proceeded on the official bond of Boyd, a Receiver of Public Moneys for the district of lands subject to sale at Columbus, Mississ
United States v. Heirs of Forbes
The United States, Appellants, v. The Heirs of John Forbes, Appellees. John Forbes, by memorial to Governor Kindelan, the Governor of East Florida, set forth, that, in 1799, there had been granted to Panton,' Leslie, and Company, for the pu
Levy v. Fitzpatrick
Barnett and Eliza Levy, Plaintiffs in error, v. Edmund and David Fitzpatrick, Defendants in error. The mortgagees, in Louisiana, filed, in the Circuit Court, their petition, stating the non-payment of the debt due on their mortgage, and tha
United States v. Dickson
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. Samuel W. Dickson and others, Defendants in error. Samuel W. Dickson was appointed a Receiver, of Public Money for the Choctaw district, Mississippi, and entered on the duties ofhis office on the 2
United States v. Rodman
The United States, Appellants, v. John Rodman, Assignee of Robert M‘Hardy, Appellee. A claim to land in East Florida, founded on a grant by Governor' Kin
Smith v. Clapp
Archibald K. Smith, Plaintiff in error, v. Alfred Clapp, Defendant in error. By a statute of Alabama, it is enacted that every joint promissory note shall be deemed and construed to have the same effect in law as a joint and several promiss
Ex parte Crenshaw
Ex parte Anderson Crenshaw. An appeal was prosecuted by the complainants in the Circuit' Court of Alabama, to the Supreme Court, and the citation required by the act of Congress had not been served on the appellee,, and he had no notice of
Gorman v. Lenox's Executors
John B. Gorman and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. Peter Lenox’s Executors, Defendants in error. On a demurrer being filed, the rule is, that the party who has committed the first fault shall have judgment against him. Where a declaration i
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.