Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1842 Cases
43 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Prigg v. Pennsylvania
Edward Prigg, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Defendant in Error. A writ of error to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, brought under .the tyventyfifth section of the judiciary act of 118?, to revise the judgment of
Mauran v. Bullus
Joshua Mauran, Plaintiff in error, v. Edward Bullus, Defendant in error. Construction of a letter of guarantee. In the construction of all written instruments, to ascertain the intention of the parties is the great object of the Court, anc^
Mills v. Brown
Adam S. Mills and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. William G. Brown and others, and the County of St. Clair, Defendants in error. The Supreme Court has not' jurisdiction on a writ of error to the Supreme Court of a-state, in which the judgme
Todd v. Daniel
James Todd, Thomas Warren, Tristram G Mitchell, William C. Mitchell, and Woodbury Storer, Administrator of Israel Waterhouse, Deceased, v. Charles Daniel, Complainant and Appellee. Motion to dismiss an appeal. The appellants were the origin
Carver v. Hyde
Eleazer Carver, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph A. Hyde and others, Defendants in error. Action for damages for a violation of a patent for an improvement on the cotton gin. The charge of the Circuit Court of Massachusetts upon the facts in t
Carpenter v. Providence Washington Insurance
Jeremiah Carpenter, Plaintiff in error v. The Providence Washington Insurance Company, Defendants in error. Action on a policy of insurance vn the “ Glenoo Cotton Factory,” against loss or damage by fire. The policy was dated the 27th day o
Harpending v. Minister, Elders, & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church
Smith Harpending, and others, Appellants, v. The Minister, Elders, and Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of the City of New York, and others, Appellees. A bill was filed in the Circuit Court of the southern district of New Yor
Parish v. Ellis
Charlotte A. Parish, Appellant, v. Harvey W. Ellis and Wife, Appellees. The acts of Congress, relating to judicial proceedings in the territory of Florida, give the right' of appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, in cases of equ
Dobbins v. Commissioners of Erie County
Daniel Dobbins, Plaintiff in error, v. The Commissioners of Erie County, Defendants in error. A captain of the United States revenue cutter, on the f¡rie station in Pennsylvania, was rated and assessed for county taxes, as an officer of the
Martin v. Lessee of Waddell
Merrit Martin and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Lessee of William C. H. Waddell, Defendant in error. Ejectment for one hundred acres of land, covered with' water, .in Raritan bay, in the township of Perth Amboy, in the state of New Je
Wood v. United States
Thomas Wood, Junior, Claimant of twenty-two Packages or Pieces of Cloth, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States, Defendants in error. .'he United States filed in the District Court of the United States, for the Maryland district, a libel
Prouty v. Ruggles
David Prouty and John Mears, Plaintiffs in error, v. Draper Ruggles et al., Defendants in error. The plaintiffs, in the Circuit Court, claimed damages for the'infringement of their patent for “a new and useful improvement in the constructio
Fresh v. Gilson
William H. Fresh,Plaintiff in error, v. Riah Gilson,Christopher Midlar, and James Fresh, Defendants in error. Liability for the acts of others may be created either by a direct authority given for their performance,.or it may flow from thei
Roach v. Hulings
James Roach, Administrator of Philip Roach, Plaintiff in error, v. David W. Hulings, Defendant in error. The jury, in rendering their verdict; failed to respond separately to the distinct issues they were sworn to try. The defendant had ple
Bradstreet v. Potter
Martha Bradstreet, Demandant, Plaintiff in error, v. William F. Potter, Tenant, Defendant in error. The questions presented to this Court on the writ of error being the samé with those ■ in Bradatreét v, Thomas, 12 Petera, 174 the jadgmetit
Gibson v. Chew
John A. Gibson and Kinchen A. Martin, Plaintiffs in error, v. Beverly Chew, Defendant in error. -The Circuit Courts of the United States have not cognisance of any suit to.recover - the contents, of any prQmissory note- or other chose: in a
Amis v. Smith
John D. Amis, Plaintiff in error, v. Nathan Smith, Defendant in error. Mississippi. Action on a promissory note against sundry persons surviving partners of the unincorporated Real Estate Bank of Columbus, Mississippi, founded on their cert
United States v. Eliason
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. Mary L. Eliason, Administratrix of William A. Eliason, Defendant in error. Ah action was brought by the United States against Captain Eliason, for a balance due by him as disbursing officer at Fort
Armstrong v. Treasurer of Athens County
Thomas Armstrong and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Treasurer of Athens County, Defendant in error. An act was passed by thb legislature in 1840,' by which certain lands held under conveyances from :the President and Trustees of the Oh
Kelsey v. Hobby
Charles Kelsey, and Charles M'Intyre, Appellants, v. Alfred M. Hobby, and Thomas P. Bond, Complainants. On the dissolution of a partnership in 1822, it was agreed with the out-going partners, H. and B., that the debts due to the partnership
Mayor of Mobile v. Hallett
The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Mobile, Plaintiffs in error, v. William E. Hallett, Executor of Joshua Kennedy, deceased, Dependant in error. A grant by the Spanish government, confirmed by the United States, was made of a lot of grou
Mayor of Mobile v. Eslava
The Mayor and Aldermen of The City of Mobile, Plaintiffs error, v. Miguel D. Eslava, Defendant in error. A lot. of ground, part of the ground on which-Fort Charlotte had been erected, in the city' of Mobile, before the territory was acquire
United States v. Heirs of Clarke
The United States, Appellants, v. The Heirs of George J. F. Clarke, and The Heirs of George Atkinson, Appellees. A Florida land claim. A grant of fifteen thousand acres by the Spanish Governor of .East Florida, in consideration of important
Milnor v. Metz
Robert Milnor, John Thompson, David Petrikin, and Levi Woodbury, Secretary of the Treasury, Complainants and Appellants, v. George W. Metz, Appellee. M. was discharged by the insolvent laws of Pennsylvania, after having made, according to t
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.