Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1843

Bronson v. Kinzie

Arthur Bronson, Complainant, v. John H. Kinzie and Juliette A., his wife, Edmund K. Bussing and John S. Bussing, The President, Directors, and Company of the State Bank of Illinois, Jay Hathway, Mary Ann Wolcott, Daniel S. Griswold, Carolin

42 U.S. 311 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1843

Duncan v. Darst

Andrew Duncan, Plaintiff in error, v. Isaac Darst, Henry Darst, and Jacob Darst, Defendants. A person in custody under, a capias ad satisfaciendum issued under the authority of the Circuit Court of the United States, cannot legally be disch

42 U.S. 301 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1843

Williams v. United States

James Williams, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States, Defendants in error. The act of Congress passed January 31st, 1823, prohibiting, the advance of public money in any. case whatsoever to the disbursing officers of government, except

42 U.S. 290 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1843

Todd v. Daniell

James Todd, Appellant, v. Otis Daniell, Defendant.

42 U.S. 289 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1843

Minor v. Tillotson

William J. Minor and Catherine his wipe, Plaintiffs in error, v. Shubal Tillotson. Whether or not a record contains a bill of exceptions or statement, of facts; by the court, according to the practice in Louisiana, by which' any question of

42 U.S. 287 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1843

Collins v. Blyth

Joel Collins, a petitioner in bankruptcy, v. James Blyth, an opposing creditor. (This case is similar to that of Nelson.)

42 U.S. 282 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1843

Castleman

Charles W. Castleman, a petitioner in bankruptcy. (This case is similar to that.of. Nelson.)

42 U.S. 281 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1843

Nelson v. Carland

William Nelson, a petitioner in bankruptcy, v. Daniel Carland, an opposing creditor. Upon questions adjourned from the District to the Circuit Court under the “Act to establish a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United States,” t

42 U.S. 265 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Settled 1843

Peck v. Young

Samuel Peck, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary Young. In error to the Court for the trial, of Impeachments and Correction of Error, of the state of New York.

42 U.S. 250 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Estate Planning & Probate 1843

McKenna v. Fisk

Bernard McKenna, Plaintiff in error, v. Charles B. Fisk, Defendant. 'After pleading the general issue, it is too late to take advantage of'a defect in the writ, or a variance between the writ and declaration. Actions of trespass, except tho

42 U.S. 241 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1843

President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England Bank

The President and Directors of the Bank of the Metropolis, Plaintiffs in error, v. The President, Directors, and Company of the New England Bank, Defendants. ■ When there have been, for seyeral years,.mutual and extensive dealings between t

42 U.S. 234 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1843

Lessee of Jewell v. Jewell

Lessee of Sarah I. Jewell and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. Benjamin Jewell and others, Defendants. The declarations of a-deceased member of a family that the parents of it never were married, áre admissible in evidence whether his connec

42 U.S. 219 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Tax Law 1843

Connor v. Bradley

Mary Ann Connor, v. Henry Bradley and Mary, his wife. In an action of ejectment, if the plaintiff count upon a lease to himself from a person whom the evidence shows to have been dead at the time, it is bad. It is a settled rule at common l

42 U.S. 211 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1843

McClurg v. Kingsland

William T. McClurg, John C. Parry, and Enoch J. Higby, Partners, doing business under the firm of McClurg, Parry, and Higby, Assignees of James Harley, Plaintiffs in error, v. Lawrence Kingsland, Isaac Lightner and James Cuddy, Partners, do

42 U.S. 202 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1843

Ellis v. Jones

Thomas E. Ellis, Jonathan M. Hill, Daniel Roper, and T. B. Bethea, Plaintiffs in error, v. Thomas Jones, Administrator of Montraville D. Taylor, deceased. The. law of the state of Alabama, passea m 1821, c. 26, s. 5, which authonz.cs securi

42 U.S. 197 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1843

Bowman v. Wathen

Isaac S. Bowman and George W. S. Bowman, — — Brinker and Mary, his wife, formerly Mary Bowman, and Rebecca Bowman, by said Isaac S. and George W. S. Bowman, their next friend, the said Mary and Rebecca being infants under twenty-one years o

42 U.S. 189 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Settled 1843

Cartwright v. Howe

Elizabeth R. Cartwright, Plaintiff in error, v. Alexander T. Howe, George F. Richards, and William Richards, Defendants.

42 U.S. 188 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1843

Bell v. Bruen

James C. Bell and Robert Grant, Plaintiffs in error, v. Matthias Bruen. ' A letter of guarantee, written in the United States, and addressed to a house in England, must he construed according to'the laws of that country. Extrinsic evidence'

42 U.S. 169 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Estate Planning & Probate 1843

McKnight v. Taylor

Charles McKnight, Appellant, v. Lawrence B. Taylor, Trustee, &c. There must be conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence, to call into action the powers of .a court of equity. In matters of account, where they are not barred by the a

42 U.S. 161 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1843

Lloyd v. Hough

John Lloyd, Plaintiff in error, v. George S. Hough. The action of assumpsit for the use and occupation of lands and houses, ex, isted in Virginia anterior to the cession of the District of Columbia to the United States. But this action is f

42 U.S. 153 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1843

President of the Bank of the United States v. Beverly

The President, Directors, and Company of the Bank of the United States, and the United States, v. James B. Beverly and Jane his wife, William Ramsay and Elizabeth his wife, Hamilton and James Peter, heirs of David Peter, deceased, and Georg

42 U.S. 134 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1843

Marris v. Nixon

Thomas Marris, Complainant and Appellant, v. Maria Nixon, Henry J. Williams and Thomas Biddle, Henry J. Williams and Maria Nixon, executors of the last will and testament of Henry Nixon, deceased, And Maria Nixon, sole devisee of the said l

42 U.S. 118 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1843

United States v. Linn

The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. William Linn and others. A plaintiff may, in an action in form ex delicto against several defendants, enter a nolle prosequi against one of them. But in actions in form cx contractu, unless the def

42 U.S. 104 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1843

Mayor of Mobile v. Emanuel

Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Mobile, Plaintiffs, v. J. Emanuel and G. S. Gaines, Defendants. The case of the City of Mobile v. Hallett, 16 Peters, 261, examined and confirmed. Under the exception contained in the act of Congress of 182

42 U.S. 95 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion