Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1844 Cases
38 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bank of the United States v. United States
The Bank of the United States, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. By a treaty between the United States and France, the latter agreed to pay to the former a certain sum of money, {he first instalment of which became due on the second
Hanson v. Eustace's Lessee
William R. Hanson, Joseph L. Moss, Isaac Phillips, Joseph M. Moss, and David Samuel, Plaintiffs in error, v. Lessee of John H. Eustace. A refusal to^produce books and papers under a notice, lays the foundation for the introduction of second
Gaines v. Chew
Edmund P. Gaines and Wife v. Beverly Chew, Richard Relf, and others. It. is impossible to lay down any general rule as to what constitutes multifariousness in a bill in equity. Every case must be governed by its own circumstances, and the c
McCracken v. Hayward
John L. McCracken, Plaintiff in error, v. Charles Hayward. A law of the state of Illinois, providing that a sale shall not be made of property levied on under an execution, unless'it will bring two-thirds of its valuation/ according to the
Pollard's Lessee v. Files
Lessee of John Pollard, William Pollard, John Fowler and Harriet his wife, Henry P. Ensign and Phebe his wife, George Huggins and Louisa his wife, Joseph Case and Eliza his wife, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph F. Files, Defendant. Tt is the
Ladiga v. De Marcus Roland
Sally Ladiga, Plaintiff in error, v. Ricard De Marcus Roland, and Peter Hiefner, Defendants. By a treaty made between the United States and the Creek tribe of Indians, east of the Mississippi river, on the 24th of March, 1832, it was stipul
Burwell v. Cawood
Nathaniel Burwell, Complainant and Appellant, v. Daniel Cawood, William C. Gardner, Executor of Joseph Mandeville, deceased, and John West, Defendants. Although by the general rule of law, every partnership is dissolved by the death of one
Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-road v. Letson
The Louisville, Cincinnati, and Charleston Rail-road Company, Plaintiffs in error, v. Thomas W. Letson, Defendant. A citizen of one state can sue a corporation which has been created by, and transacts its business in, another state, (the su
Adams v. Roberts
Austin L. Adams and Ann C. Harding, Plaintiffs in error, v. Julia Roberts. On the trial of a petition for freedom, a paper was produced, which was a copy of á deed of manumission, executed in December, 1801, by the owner of certain slaves i
Rhett v. Poe
Robert Barnwell Rhett, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert F. Poe, Cashier of the Bank of Augusta, Defendant. Where the drawer of a bill has no right to expect the payment of it by the acceptor: where, for instance, the drawer has withdrawn, or i
Sibbald v. United States
Ex parte in the Matter of Charles F. Sibbald, Appellant, v. The United States. Upon a petition so to alter a former mandate of this court, as to direct lands ih Florida, which had not been offered for sale under the President’s proclamation
Lawrence v. McCalmont
Susan Lawrence, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert McCalmont, Hugh McCalmont, and William Johnson Newell, Defendants. The following guarantee, viz. : “In consideration of Messrs. J. and A. Lawrence having a credit with your house, and in further
Randel v. Brown
John Randel, Jun., Appellant v. William Linn Brown. William Linn Brown, Appellant, v. John Randel, Jun. John Randel, Jun., placed in the hands of Brown two certificates of stock, which Brown afterwards refused to restore. Randel filed a bil
Rhodes v. Bell
James Rhodes, Plaintiff in error, v. Moses Bell. The District of Columbia being still governed by the laws of Virginia and Maryland, which were in force anterior to the cession, it is not lawful for an inhabitant of Washington county to pur
Taylor v. Savage
William Taylor and others, Appellants, v. George M. Savage, Executor of Samuel Savage, deceased, defendant. The case of Taylor and others v. Savage, 1 Howard, 282, examined and. confirmed. This case came before the court at the last term,-
Minor v. Tillotson
William J. Minor, and Catharine his wife, Plaintiffs in error, v. Shubal Tillotson. The distinction between writs of error and appeals cannot be overthrown by an agreement of counsel in the court below, that all the evidence in the cause sh
Dade v. Irwin
Jane Dade, Complainant, v. Thomas Irwin, Jun., executor of Thomas Irwin, deceased, and William L. Hodgson, Defendants. A court of equity will not interfere; where the complainant has a proper remedy at law, or where the complainant claims a
Catts v. Phalen
John Catts, Plaintiff in error, v. James Phalen, and Francis Morris, Defendants in error. A person who receives the prize money, in a lottery, for a ticket which he had caused to be fraudulently drawn as a prize, is liable to the lottery co
Chouteau v. Eckhart
Pierre Chouteau, Sen., Plaintiff in error, v. William Eckhart. This court has jurisdiction, nuclei: the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary act, in a Missouri land cause, where the title-is not'to be determined by Spanish iaws alone, b.ut
Grignon's Lessee v. Astor
Lessee of Robert Grignon, Peter R. Grignon, and Morgan L. Martin, Plaintiffs in error, v. John J. Astor, Ramsay Crooks, Robert Stuart, and Linns Thompson. By a law of Michigan, passed in 1818, the County Courts had power, under certain circ
Stoddard v. Chambers
Simeon Stoddard, Curtis Stoddard, Daniel Stoddard, Anthony Stoddard, William Stoddard, Joseph Bunnell and Lucy his wife, Jonas Foster and Lavinia his wife, Lucy Hoxie, Daniel Morgan and Ava his wife, Plaintiffs in error, v. Harry W. Chamber
Murphy v. Stewart
John Murphy and John Darrington, Administrators of William Matheson, deceased, Plaintiffs in error, v. Angus Stewart, Administrator of Alexander Grant. The court below, on motion, arrested a judgment for the plaintiff, after verdict, but wi
Buckhannan, Hagan & Co. v. Tinnin
Buckhannan, Hagan and Co., for the use of George Buckhannan, Plaintiffs, v. William Tinnin, Ralph Campbell, and John G. Andrews, Defendants. if the marshal receives bank-notes in discharge of an execution, and the plaintiff sanctións it, ei
Griffin v. Thompson
Thomas Griffin and Hugh Ervin v. Robert Thompson. A marshal has no, right to receive bank notes in discharge of an execution . unless authorized to do so by the plaintiff. .If the marshal does receive such papers,-the court, in the! exercis
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.