Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1845 Cases
49 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lane v. Vick
John Lane and Sarah C. Lane, wife of the said John, and Elizabeth Irion, an infant under twenty-one years, who sues by John Lane her next friend, Complainants and Appellants, v. John W. Vick, Sargeant S. Prentiss et al., Defendants. Newit V
Carroll v. Safford
Charles H. Carroll, Complainant, v. Orrin Safford, Treasurer of the county of Genesee, in the state of Michigan, Defendant. When the purchaser , of land from the United States has paid for it, and received a final certificate) it is taxable
Nugent v. Boyd
Richard Nugent, Assignee of Elizabeth Norton, in Bankruptcy, Plaintiff in error, v. George W. Boyd, Isaac T. Preston, and Abner Phelps, Defendants. The principles established in the case of Ex parte the City Bank of New Or-. leans in the ma
Washington Bridge Co. v. Stewart
Washington Bridge Company, Appellant, v. William Stewart, James Stewart, and John Glenn. After a case has been decided iipon its merits, and remanded to the court below, „ if it is again brought up on a second appeal, it is then too late to
Oliver v. Piatt
William Oliver and Micajah T. Williams and others, Appellants, v. Robert Piatt. In cases of trust, where the trustee has violated his trust by an illegal conversion of the trust property, the cestui que trust has a right to follow the prope
Ex parte City Bank
Ex Parte, The City Bank of New Orleans in the matter of William Christy, Assignee of Daniel T. Walden, a Bankrupt. This oourt has no revising power over the decrees of the District Court sitting in bankruptcy; noris it authorized to issue a
White v. Nicholls
Robert White, Plaintiff in error, v. William S. Nicholls, William Robinson, Otho M. Linthicum, Edward M. Linthicum, Raphael Semmes, Paul Stevens, and Charles C. Fulton, Defendants in error. Robert White, Plaintiff in error, v. Henry Addison
Cary v. Curtis
William F. Cary and Samuel T. Cary, Plaintiffs, v. Edward Curtis. Since the .passage of .the act' of Congress of'March 3d, 1839, chap. 83, sect. 2, which requires collectors of the.&ifstoms to place to the 'credit of the treasurer of the Un
Pollard v. Hagan
John Pollard et al., Lessee, Plaintiff in error, v. John Hagan et al., Defendants in Error. The stipulation cbntainedjn the 6th section 'of the act of Congress, passed, on the 2d of March,1819, for the admission of the state of-Alabama into
Taylor v. United States
John Taylor, Junior, and William Blackburne and Co., Claimants of cloths and kerseymeres, Plaintiffs in error, v. The United States, Defendants in error. It is the right of an officer of the customs to seize goods which are suspected tcrhav
Croghan v. Nelson
Lessee of Angelica Croghan et al., Plaintiff, v. John Nelson, Defendant. In making an entry of land, where mistakes occur which are occasioned by the impracticability of ascertaining the relative positions of the objects-called for, the cou
Searight v. Stokes
William Searight, Commissioner and Superintendent of the Cumberland Road, within the State of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff in error, v. William B. Stokes and Lucius W. Stockton, who have survived Richard C. Stockton, Defendants in error. tinder
Gordon v. Appeal Tax Court
Samuel Gordon, Plaintiff in error, v. The Appeal Tax Court. James Cheston, Plaintiff in error, v. The Appeal Tax Court. The charter of a hank is ¿'franchise, which is not taxable, as such, if a price has been paid for it, which the legislat
United States v. Gear
The United States, Plaintiff, v. Hezekiah H. Gear, Defendant. The United States, Complainant, v. Hezekiah H. Gear, Defendant. The act of Congress .entitled “ An act to create additional land districts in the ._ states of Illinois- and Misso
Waller v. Best
Lessee of Henry Waller, Assignee of the bankrupt estate of Francis A. Savage, Plaintiff, v. James and Joseph Best. In Kentucky, the creditor obtains a lien upon the property of his debtor by the delivery of a.fi.fa. to the sheriff; and this
Swartwout v. Gihon
Samuel Swartwout, Plaintiff in error, v. John Gihon et al. When ’ an importer tneans to contest the payment of duties, it is not necessary-for him to give a written notice thereof to the collector. The question of notice is-a fact for the j
Curtis v. Martin
Edward Curtis, Plaintiff in error, v. William Martin and Charles A. Coe, Defendants. An act of Congress imposing a duty upon imports must be construed to describe the article upon which the duty is imposed, according to the commercial under
Ex parte Dorr
Ex Parte Dorr. Neither the-Supreme Court, nor any other court of the United States, or judge thereof, can issue a habeas corpus to bring up a prisoner, who is in custody under a sentence or execution óf a state court,' for any other purpose
Kendall v. Stokes
Amos Kendall, Plaintiff in error, v. William B. Stokes, Lucius W. Stockton, and Daniel Moore, survivors of Richard C. Stockton, Defendants in error. [The reader is referred to a former case between these parties, reported in 12 Peters, 524.
Poultney v. City of Lafayette
Emily Poultney et al., Appellants, v. The City of Lafayette, Isaac T. Preston et al., Defendants. Before a case can be dismissed under the 21st rule, regulating equity practice, there must exist, in the technical sense, a plea or demurrer o
Henderson v. Anderson
William Henderson, Plaintiff in error, v. John Anderson. This court adheres to the rule laid down in Walton v. Shelly, i T. it. 296, sustained as it has been by tire decisions of this court'in The Bank'of the United States v. Bunn, 6 Peters
Walker v. President of the Bank of Washington
John Walker, Plaintiff in error, v. The President and Directors of the Bank of Washington, Defendant in error. Every subsequent security» given for a loan originally usurious, however remote or often yenewed, is void. Where there was an app
Dickson v. Wilkinson ex rel. Wilkinson
James N. and Levi Dickson, Plaintiffs, v. William H. Wilkinson, Administrator of John T. Wilkinson, deceased. There was a judgment against an administrator of assets guando acciderint. Upon this judgment a scire facias was issued, containin
Barry v. Gamble
James Barry, Plaintiff in error, v. Hamilton R. Gamble. Under the act of 1815, a New Madrid certificate-could be located upon lands before .they were offered', at public sale under a proclamation of the President, or even surveyed'by the pu
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.