Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1847 Cases
36 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fletcher v. Rhode Island
Joel Fletcher, Plaintiff in error, v. The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Defendant in error. This case wag very similar to the preceding one. The principal difference was in the admission of the'fact, that the brandy, fox
Thurlow v. Massachusetts
Samuel Thurlow, Plaintiff in error, v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Joel Fletcher, Plaintiff in error, v. The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. Andrew Peirce, Jr., and Thomas W. Peirce, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Stat
Waring v. Clarke
Nathaniel S. Waring and Peter Dalman, owners of the Steamboat De Soto, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, Appellants, v. Thomas Clarke, late Master of the Steamboat Luda, and agent of P. T. Marionoux and. T. J. Abel, owners of said Steambo
Fox v. Ohio
Malinda Fox v. The State of Ohio. The power conferred upon'-Congress by the fifth and sixth clauses of the eighth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States, viz.: — “ To coin money, regulate the value thereof, an
United States v. Bank of the United States
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Bank of the United States. In the case of The United States». The Bank of the United States (2 Howard, 711), the oourt is of opinion that the question on the structure of the bill is an open qu
Scott v. Jones
John Scott and Carl Boland, Plaintiffs in error, v. John Jones, Lessee of The Detroit Young Men’s Society, Defendants in error. An objection to the validity of a statute, founded upon the ground that the legislature which passed it were not
President of the Commercial Bank of Cincinnati v. Buckingham's Executors
The President, Directors, and Company of the Commercial Bank of Cincinnati, Plaintiffs in error, v. Eunice Buckingham’s Executors, Defendants in error. To bring a case to this court from the highest court of a State, under the twenty-fifth
Innerarity v. Byrne
James Innerarity, Plaintiff in error, v. Thomas Byrne. A citation is not necessarily a part of the record, and the fact of its haying been . issued and served may be proved aliunde. Mr. Bagby moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case
Phillips v. Preston
George W. Phillips, Plaintiff in error, v. John S. Preston, Defendant in error. Under the practice of Louisiana, peremptory exceptions tnust he considered as specially pleaded when they are set forth in writing, in a specific or detailed fo
Taylor v. Benham
William Taylor, George Taylor, William Primrose, and Eliza, his Wife, George Porter, and Elspet, his Wife, William Rainey, Alexander Rainey, and Elizabeth Rainey, Complainants and Appellants, v. Vincent M. Benham, Administrator de bonis non
Jones v. Zandt
Wharton Jones, Plaintiff, v. John Van Zandt. Under the fourth section of the act of 12th February, 1793, respecting fugitives from justice, and persons esca^.ug from the service of their master, on a charge for harbouring and concealing fug
Miners' Bank of Dubuque v. United States ex rel. Grant
Miners’ Bank of Dubuque, Plaintiffs in error, v. The United States ex rel. James Grant. A judgment of a court, sustaining a demurrer under the following circumstances, is not a final judgment which can be reviewed by this court. Information
Sheppard v. Wilson
John C. Sheppard and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. John Wilson. Where a writ of error was allowed, the citation signed, and the bond approved, by the chief justice of the-Territorial court of Iowa, it-was a sufficient compliance with the
United States v. Briggs
The United States, Plaintiff, v. Ephraim Briggs. When a case is brought up to this court on a certificate of division in opinion; the upon which the difference occurs must be distinctly stated. here there was a demurrer, upon three grounds,
Creath's Administrator v. Sims
Albert G. Creath’s Administrator, Complainant and Appellant, v. William D. Sims. The following principles of equity jurisprudence maybe affirmed to be without exception; namely, that whosoever would seek admission into a court of equity mus
In re Metzger
In the Matter of Nicholas Lucien Metzger. The treaty with France, made in 1843, provides for the mutual surrender of fugitives fr.om justice, in certain cases. Where a district judge, at his chambers, decided that there was sufficient cause
Gear v. Parish
Hezekiah H. Gear, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Parish. In this case, the pleadings and proofs show that a mortgage executed by the debtor to the creditor was really for an unascertained balance of accounts, which the sum named in the mortgage wa
Ford v. Douglas
Christopher Ford, Appellant, v. Archibald Douglas, Maxwell W. Bland, and Emeline, his Wife, Appellees. By, the laws of Louisiana,' where tnere has been a judicial sale of the succession by a probate judge, a creditor of the estate, who .obt
Truly v. Wanzer
Bennet R. Truly, Complainant and Appellant, v. Moses Wanzer, Jabez Harrison, and John R. Nicholson. The preceding case of Rowan and Harris v. Runnels reviewed and confirmed. The' general principle with regard to injunctions after a judgment
Rowan v. Runnels
John A. Rowan and John L. Harris, Copartners in Trade under the Name and Style of Rowan and Harris, Plaintiffs in error, v. Hiram G. Runnels, Defendant in error. Same v. Same. In the case of Groves ®. Slaughter (15 Peters, 449) this court d
Nelson v. Hill
John G. Nelson, Charles G. Carleton, William H. Stewart (Partners in Trade under the Name of Nelson, Carleton, & Co.), Henry Parish, Daniel Parish, John R. Marshall, John B. Seaman, Thomas Parish, Leroy M. Wiley (Partners in Trade under the
Mayberry v. Thompson
Jacob S. Mayberry, Plaintiff in error, v. James H. Thompson, Defendant. Under tile acts of 1839, chap. 20 (5 .Statutes at Large, 315), and 1840, chap. 43 Í5 Statutes at Large, 392), where a case was carried from the District Court or the Mi
Barry v. Mercein
John A. Barry, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary Mercein and Eliza Ann Barry. This. court has no appellate power, in a case where the Circuit Court refused to grant a writ' of habeas corpus, prayed for by a father to take his infant child out of
Hall v. Smith
Henry A. Hall, Plaintiff, v. William Smith. Where there aré privies in a contract with the knowledge of a debtor to secure to his creditor the payment of a debt, the payment of it by any one of them other than the debtor, is a payment at hi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.