Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1856 Cases
61 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sturgis v. Honold
Lathrop L. Sturgis, Plaintiff in Error, v. Christian Honold. The decision in the preceding case again affirmed. This, like the preceding case, of which it constituted a branch, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the
Bulkley v. Honold
George Bulkley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Christian Honold. The law of Louisiana imposes on the seller the obligation of warranting the thing sold against its hidden defects, which are those which could not be discovered by simple inspection;
Burke v. Gaines
Patrick Burke, Plaintiff in Error, v. William H. Gaines and Wife, et al. Where a party brought an ejectment in a State court, founding, his title upon documents showing a-settlement claim under the.laws of the United States; and the Supreme
United States v. City Bank of Columbus
The United States, Plaintiffs, v. The City Bank of Columbus. Where a question was certified from the Circuit Court to,this court, viz: whether a certain letter, written hy the cashier of a bank without-the knowledge of the directory, though
Platt v. Jerome
Obadiah H. Platt, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chauncey Jerome. The competent parties to agree that a case shall he settled, and the writ of error dismissed, are usually the parties upon the record. If either of them has assigned his interest, an
Ballard v. Thomas
Albert Ballard, Charles Chadbourne, Eliphalet Gilman, and Henry W. Heird, trading under the firm of Ballard, Chadbourne, & Co., v. Philip P. Thomas, Collector. In estimating tlie duty payable at the custom-house upon imported iron, it was p
Michigan Central Railroad v. Michigan Southern Railroad
The Michigan Central Railroad Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Michigan Southern Railroad Company et al. Where a case is brought up to this court by a writ of error issued to the Supreme Court of a State, under the twenty-fifth section
McRea v. Branch of the Bank of Alabama
Margaret McRea and Bracy McRea, Administrators of John D. Bracy, Appellants, v. The Branch of the Bank of the State of Alabama at Mobile. Where money wag borrowed from a bank upon á promissory note, signed by the principal and two Sureties,
Roberts v. Cooper
Enoch C. Roberts, Plaintiff in Error, v. James M. Cooper. Where the judgment of the Circuit Court, in an action of ejectment, was against the defendant, in which nominal damages only were awarded, who sued out a writ of error in order to. b
Fellows v. Blacksmith
Joseph Fellows, Survivor of Robert Kendle, Plaintiff in Error, v. Susan Blacksmith and Ely S. Parker, Administrators of John Blacksmith, Deceased. The United States made two treaties, one in 1838, and one in 1842, with the Seneca Indians, r
United States v. Sutherland
The United States, Appellants, v. Thomas W. Sutherland, Guardian of Victoria, Isabel, Miguel, and Helina, Minor Children of Miguel de Pedrorena, Deceased. That the Spanish grants of land in California -were large, is no reason why this cour
Tod v. Pratt
Daniel Tod, Daniel P. Rhodes, Robert C. Yates, and James Ford, Libellants and Appellants, v. Samuel F. Pratt and Edward P. Beals, Claimants of Steamboat Sultana, her Engine, Boiler, &c. The decision in the preceding case of Pratt, &c., clai
Pratt v. Reed
Samuel F. PRATT, Pascal P. Pratt, and Edward P. Beals, Claimants of the Steamboat Sultana, Appellants, v. Charles M. Reed, Libellant. In order to creitte a maritime lien for supplies furnished to a vessel, there must be a necessity for the
Walton v. Cotton
Josiah Walton, Administrator of Priscilla Cotton, et al., Complainants and Plaintiffs in Error, v. Allen Cotton, Noah Cotton, and William E. Jones. Under the act of Congress passed on the 2d of June, 1832, providing for the relief of certai
McCullough v. Roots
John McCullough and Cyrus D. Culbertson, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Gurnsey Y. Roots and Erastus P. Coe. Where a sale was made of merchandise, and two parties,' viz: Roots & Ooe as one party, and Henry Lewis as the other party, both claimed to
United States v. Peralta
The United States, Appellants, v. Domingo and Vicente Peralta. Where a claimant of land in • California produced documentary evidence in his favor, copied from the archives in the office of the surveyor general and other original grants by
Ballance v. Papin
Charles Ballance, Plaintiff in Error, v. Adolph Papin, Henry Papin, and Mary Atchison. Under the circumstances described in the-preceding case, if there -was no sufficient evidence of a survey under the act of 1823, the title claimed, under
Bryan v. Forsyth
William F. Bryan and Rudolphus Rouse, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Robert Forsyth. By the acts Of Congress passed on the 15th of May, 1820, and March 3d, 1823, provision "was made, that each of the settlers in Peoria, Illinois, should be entitle
Field v. Seabury
Edward Field, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pardon G. Seabury et al. The decision in the preceding case of Field v. Seabury, again affirmed. This, like the preceding case, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United Stat
Field v. Seabury
Edward Field, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pardon G. Seabury et al. When, a grant or patent for land, or legislative confirmation of titles to land, has i heen given by the sovereignty or legislative authority only having the right to make it, wi
Commercial Mutual Marine Insurance v. Union Mutual Insurance Co.
The Commercial Mutual Marine Insurance Company, Appellants, v. The Union Mutual Insurance Company of New York. Where application for reinsurance, was made on Saturday,’ upon certain terms, which were declined, and other terms demanded, and
Garrison v. Memphis Insurance Co.
Oliver and Daniel R. Garrison, Appellants, v. The Memphis Insurance Company. Where -bills of lading for goods, shipped on board of a steamboat in the river Mississippi, mentioned that the carrier was not to be responsible for accidents whic
Byers v. Surget
William Byers, Appellant, v. Francis Surget. Where there -was a judgment for costs against the'plaintiff, in a suit where the defendant pleaded a discharge in bankruptcy, and' the attorney for the defendant taxed those costs, directed the p
Babcock v. Wyman
Archibald Babcock, Appellant, v. Edward Wyman. Parol evidence is admissible to show that a conveyance of property, absolute upon the face of it, was really a mortgage or deed of trust. In the present case, parol evidence, taken in conjuncti
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.