Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1857

James L. v. Carryl

James L. and Samuel L. Taylor, Administrators of Robert Taylor, deceased, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Nathan T. Carryl, who survived William J. Ward. Where a vessel had. been seized under a process of foreign attachment-issuing from a State cou

61 U.S. 583 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1857

Ransom v. Mayor of New York

Ex parte in the matter of Franklin Ransom and Uzziah Weeman v. The Mayor, Aldermen, and Commonalty, of the City of New York. Where there -was an order of the Circuit Court to set aside a judgment upon payment by the defendant of the costs w

61 U.S. 581 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

Sampson v. Peaslee

George R. Sampson and Lewis W. Tappan, doing business under the style and firm of Sampson & Tappan, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Charles H. Peaslee, Collector of Customs. By the eighth section of the act of Congress passed pn the 30th of July, 1

61 U.S. 571 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1857

Irvine v. Marshall

John R. Irvine, Appellant, v. William R. Marshall and Thomas Barton. At a sale of public lands in a Territory, an agent who purchased for another must account, as trustee, to his employer, although the statutes of the Territory have abolish

61 U.S. 558 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

McCargo v. Chapman

Thomas McCargo, Plaintiff in Error, v. John L. Chapman. An order of'the Circuit Court to quash an execution, is not such a judgment as can be reviewed in this court by a writ of error, ~ " This case was brought up, by writ of-error,, from t

61 U.S. 555 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

Holcombe v. McKusick

William Holcombe, Plaintiff in Error, v. John McKusick, Jonathan E. McKusick, Christopher Carle, Horace K. McKinstry, Elias McKean, and Joseph C. York. Where there was a demurrer to some parts of a replication, and a motion to strike out ot

61 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Estate Planning & Probate 1857

Snow v. Hill

Thomas A. Snow and Oliver Palmer, managers of the Ocean Tow-boat Company, claimants and owners of the steam tow-boat “Star,” and Oliver Palmer, Appellants, v. Charles Hill et al., owners of the ship “Ocean Queen,” and George Law, Marshall O

61 U.S. 543 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

Whyte v. Gibbes

William Pinkney Whyte, Administrator de bonis non of John Gooding, deceased, Appellant, v. Robert M. Gibbes and Charles Oliver, surviving Executors of Robert Oliver, deceased; and Robert M. Gibbes and Charles Oliver, surviving Executors of

61 U.S. 541 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1857

Williams v. Gibbes

John S. Williams, Administrator of James Williams, deceased, Appellant, v. Robert M. Gibbes and Charles Oliver, surviving Executors of Robert Oliver, deceased; and Robert M. Gibbes and Charles Oliver, surviving Executors of Robert Oliver, d

61 U.S. 535 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

Barton v. Forsyth

James Barton, Plaintiff in Error, v. Robert Forsyth Where there was an affidavit made, after verdict and judgment, that the affiant was the real party in interest, and prayed to be substituted for, or admitted with,, the defendant, and the

61 U.S. 532 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

President v. Arkansas

The President and Directors of the Bank of Washington, and Henry S. and Frederick S. Holford, Administrators of James Holford, deceased, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Arkansas, and Henry L. Briscoe, Sandford C. Faulkner, and James H.

61 U.S. 530 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1857

Beers ex rel. Platenius v. Arkansas

Joseph D. Beers, use of William A. Platenius, as Administrator of James Holford, deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Arkansas. William A. Platenius, Administrator of James Holford, deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Ark

61 U.S. 527 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

McFaul v. Ramsey

Eneas McFaul, Plaintiff in Error, v. James C. Ramsey. Where the only bills of exception were to the refusal of the court to grant a continuance and change the venue, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed, as these matters are not

61 U.S. 523 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1857

Moreland v. Page

David Moreland, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jeremiah Page. This court has not jurisdiction, under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act, to review the judgment of a State court, where the question involved merely related to the proper bo

61 U.S. 522 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1857

Ahl v. Johnson

John N. Ahl, Appellant, v. Roswell B. Johnson. Where there was a. contract for the sale of a lot of ground, partly on time, and the vendee entered into possession; and the vendor .did not formally' demand the payment of the balance When due

61 U.S. 511 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1857

Selden v. Myers

Francis Selden, Appellant, v. Lawrence Myers, Philip Pike, Walter Lenox, and James C. McGuire. A person dealing with an unlettered man Who can neither read nor write, and taking from him a promissory-note for' the payment of money and a dee

61 U.S. 506 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1857

Marks v. Dickson

James Marks, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Dickson and Elizabeth M. Dickson. In May, 1830, Congress passed an act (4 Stat. at L., 420) which gave the right of preemption to settlers on the public lands, but made null and void all assignmen

61 U.S. 501 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1857

Sigerson v. Mathews

John Sigerson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward Mathews. Where the endorser of a promissory note, in conversation with the agent of the holder, before its maturity, dispensed with a presentation of the. note and demand of payment, and promised

61 U.S. 496 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1857

Ingraham v. Dawson

Alfred Ingraham and George Read, Assignees in trust of the Grand Gulf Railroad and Banking Company, Appellants, v. Henry S. Dawson, Administrator of Moses Groves, deceased, Josiah Stansbrough, and John R. Marshall. Where there were proceedi

61 U.S. 486 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1857

Roberts v. Cooper

Enoch C. Roberts, Plaintiff in Error, v. James M. Cooper. This court again decides, that after a case has been brought here and decided, and - a mandate issued to the court below, if a second writ of error is sued out, it brings up for revi

61 U.S. 467 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Personal Injury 1857

Stinson v. Dousman

James Stinson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hercules L. Dousman. Where there was a covenant to sell land upon condition that the purchase-money should be paid in instalments, and other acts done by the covenantee, in failure to perform which, ren

61 U.S. 461 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Insurance Law 1857

Warner v. Norton

Francis Warner, Plaintiff in Error, v. Cephas H. Norton, Albert Jewett, Benjamin C. Busby, John C. Phelps, John J. Phelps, Isaac N. Phelps, and James Beman, Defendants. Where a sheriff was sued for taking goods under an attachment, which go

61 U.S. 448 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1857

Brown v. Wiley

Taylor Brown, Plaintiff in Error, v. Leroy M. Wiley, Hugh R. Banks, William G. Lane, Henry Van Derzee, and Edward H. Lane, Merchants, trading under the name and style of L. M. Wiley & Co. Where a bill of exchange vas drawn in proper form an

61 U.S. 442 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1857

Suydam v. Williamson

James H. Suydam, Plaintiff in Error, v. William H. Williamson, David R. Williamson, Mary A. Williamson, Isabella Williamson, Catherine B. Williamson, Charlotte A. Williamson, Rupert J. Cochran, Isabella M. Cochrane, and Bayard Clarke. Rulin

61 U.S. 427 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion