Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1864 Cases
62 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brobst v. Brobst
Brobst v. Brobst. 1, Where the Circuit and District Judge agree in parts of a Case, and dispose of them by decree finally, but are unable to agree as to others; and certify as to them a division of opinion, both parts of the case may be bro
Badger v. Badger
Badger v. Badger. Courts of equity, acting on their own inherent ■ doctrine of discouraging, for the peace of society, antiquated demands, refuse to interfere in attempts to.establish a stale trust, except where, 1. The trust is clearly est
Banks v. Ogden
Banks v. Ogden. 1. A plat of an addition to a town, not executed, acknowledged, and recorded in conformity with the laws of Illinois, operates in that State as a dedication of the streets to public use, but not as a conveyance of the fee of
Gregg v. Forsyth
Gregg v. Forsyth. Error does not lie to a refusal of the Circuit Court to award a writ of restitution in ejectment. Forsyth had brought ejectment against Gregg in the Circuit Court for Illinois, and obtained judgment for the land sued for.
Tool Co. v. Norris
Tool Company v. Norris. 1. An agreement for compensation for procuring a contract from the Government to furnish its supplies is against public policy, and cannot be enforced by the courts. 2. “Where the special- and general counts of a dec
Miles v. Caldwell
Miles v. Caldwell. 1, The established rule, that where a matter has been once heard and determined in one court (as of law), it cannot be raised anew and reheard in another (as of equity),'is not confined to cases where the matter is made p
Drury v. Foster
Drury v. Foster. A paper, executed, under seal, for the husband’s benefit, by husband and •wife, acknowledged in separate form by the wife, and meant to be a mortgage of her separate lands, but with blanks left for the insertion of the mort
Hawthorne v. Calef
Hawthorne v. Calef. A State statute repealing a former statute, which made the stock of stockholders in a chartered company liable to the corporation’s debts, is, as respects creditors of the corporation existing at the time of the repeal,
Dermott v. Jones
Dermott v. Jones. 1. Performance of a contract to build a'house for another on the soil of such person, and that the work shall be executed, finished, and ready for use and occupation, and be delivered over so finished and ready to the owne
United States v. Olvera
UNITED STATES v. OLVERA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA. No. 149. Argued February 19, 1864. Decided March 7, 1864. Proceedings to obtain a Mexican grant in California commenced in
Milwaukee & Minnesota Railroad v. Soutter
MILWAUKEE AND MINNESOTA RAILROAD CO. v. SOUTTER. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP WISCONSIN. No. 268. Argued February 1-9, 1864. Decided February 23, 1864. Milwaukee & Minnesota Bailroad Co. v. Soutter
Milwaukee & Minnesota Railroad v. Soutter
MILWAUKEE AND MINNESOTA RAILROAD CO. v. SOUTTER. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 267. Argued February 1-9, 1864. Decided February 23, 1864. The removal or appointment of a receiver rest
United States v. Hallock
UNITED STATES v. HALLOCK. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 113. Submitted January 25, 1864. Decided February 8, 1864. A French vessel leaving France for New Orleans in May, 1861,
Richardson v. Lawrence County
RICHARDSON v. LAWRENCE COUNTY. certificate of division in opinion from the circuit court OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 100. Submitted January 12, 1864. Decided January 25, 1864. Woods v. Lawrence County,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.