Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1865 Cases
77 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Horbach v. Porter
HORBACH v. PORTER. HORBACH v. BROWN. appeals from the supreme court of the territory of NEBRASKA. Nos. 189,190. Submitted December 1, 1865. Decided December 18, 1865. When two parties acquire title to the same tract of land from the same gr
Military Commissions Cases
The Military Commissions Cases.
Dehon v. Bernal
Dehon v. Bernal. 1. When the United States and the claimant to whom a Mexican grant has: been confirmed are both satisfied with its location, any other person! who seeks to contest such a location must Bhow some title, legal or' equitable,
The Herald
The Herald. Knowledge of a recently established blockade inferred against a neutral from facts stated in the case. Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court at Philadelphia condemning the Herald and cargo as prize of war, for breach of bloc
United States v. Gomez
United States v. Gomez. .1. Though the general rule in cases of appeal undoubtedly is that the transcript of the record must be filed and the case docketed at the term next succeeding the appeal, yet the rule necessarily has exceptions; and
Secrist v. Green
Secrist v. Green. 1. An acknowledgment on the day of its date, before a master of chancery, . in New York, of a deed executed 3d March, 1818 — probate being made by a subscribing witness personally known to the master, of the identity of th
Gilman v. Philadelphia
Gilman v. Philadelphia. The power to regulate commerce comprehends the control for that purpose, and to the extent necessary, of all the navigable waters of the United States which are accessible from a State other than those on which they
Minnesota Co. v. Chamberlain
Minnesota Company v. Chamberlain. Graham & Scott v. Same, impleaded with La Crosse Railroad Company. 'The language of a decree in chancery must be construed in reference to the issue which is put forward by the prayer for relief and other p
United States v. Dashiel
United States v. Dashiel. 1. Where a writ of error is taken to this court by a plaintiff below, who previously to taking the writ issues execution below and gets a partial but not a complete satisfaction on his judgment, the writ will not,
Merriam v. Haas
Merriam v. Haas. A motion to dismiss an appeal in a decree of foreclosure, in chancery, refused, though the complainant below, appellant here, had, after his appeal made, issued execution and got the amount for which the decree he appealed
United States v. Circuit Judges
United States v. Circuit Judges. A proceeding in the District or Circuit Court of the United States under the act of March 3d, 1852, for the ascertainment and settlement of private land claims in the State of California, is in the nature of
Rogers v. Burlington
Rogers v. Burlington. 1. Where a demurrer to a declaration in the Circuit Court is improperly sustained, and judgment is rendered accordingly, the case may be reexamined here upon a writ of error without any formal bill of exceptions. 2. Po
United States v. Murphy
United States v. Murphy. 1 Under the second section of the act of 8th August, 1840, “to regulate the proceedings in the Circuit and District Courts,” and which, after authorizing the transfer of criminal causes from either court to the othe
United States v. Scott
United States v. Scott. Upon a comparison of the 25th section of the act of 3d March, 1863, passed during the rebellion, “for enrolling and calling out the national forces, and for other purposes,’’ with the 12th section of the act of 24th
Younge v. Guilbeau
Younge v. Guilbeau. 1. The statute of Texas, relating to the organization, &c., of its District Courts, which enacts that when a party shall file an affidavit of the loss of an instrument recorded under the statute, or of his inability to p
The Reform
The Reform. 3. The act of July 13, 1861, “ to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes,” and which by one section, on a proclamation by the President, mates intercourse between citizens of those parts of the U
The Admiral
The Admiral. 1. A case in prize, carried by appeal from a District Court into a Circuit Court, before the statute of March 3, 1863, allowing appeals in prize directly from the District Courts to this -court, is properly here on appeal from
Van Allen v. Assessors
Van Allen v. The Assessors. 1. The act of June 3,1864, “ To provide a national currency,” &e., rightly construed, subjects the shares of the banking associations authorized by it, and in the hands of shareholders, to taxation by the States
The Mohawk
The Mohawk. 1. The act of December 23, 1852, authorizing foreign- vessels wrecked and repaired in the United States, to be registered or enrolled, is to be taken as a part of our system of registration and enrolment. 2. Vessels éngaged in t
The Douro
The Douro. The court reproves counsel who -take appeals without any expectation oí reversal, and declares that if it had power to impose a penalty in such cases, as it has when writs of error are sued out for delay merely, it would impose i
Bollinger's Champagne
Bollinger’s Champagne. 1. Under the Tariff Act of June 30, 1864, which lays a specific duty per gallon upon wines, and an ad valorem duty also, with a proviso that no champagne in bottles shall pay a less rate than $6 per dozen (quart) or t
The Hart
The Hart. Neutrals who place their vessels under belligerent control, and engage them in belligerent trade; or permit them to be sent with contraband cargoes, under cover of false destination, to neutral ports, while the real destination is
The Bermuda
The Bermuda. 1. No trade honestly carried on between neutral ports, whether of the same or of different nations, can be lawfully interrupted by belligerents; but good faith must preside over such commerce: enemy commerce under neutral- disg
Bank for Savings v. Collector
Bank for Savings v. The Collector. 1. Savings banks which receive deposits and lend the same for the benefit of their depositors, although they may have no capital stock, and neither make discounts nor issue any money for circulation, are “
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.