Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 244,079+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1869 Cases
181 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gunnell v. Bird
Gunnell v. Bird. 1. In stating partnership accounts, where one partner has had entire charge of the business, he is to be debited with the whole capital placed in his hands, as well as with the proceeds of sales realized by him. 2. If part
Washington Railroad v. Bradleys
Washington Railroad v. Bradleys. 1. It is a gross irregularity to hear a case without some terms imposed, on an amended bill filed after replication, without leave of the court. 2. So it is an irregularity to go to hearing without replicati
Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-house Co.
Slaughter-house Cases. The Butchers’ Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live-stock Landing and Slaughter-house Company. Same Defendants v. Same Plaintiffs. Hotair Imbau et al. v. The Crescent City Live-stock Landing
Deery v. Cray
Deery v. Cray. 1. A deed which referred to a plat of the land for one of the lines of the boundary, maybe read in evidence to the jury without the produc-. tion of the plat, subject to an identification of such lin.e by competent evidence d
New Orleans Railroad v. Morgan
New Orleans Railroad v. Morgan. The appellee filed his petition in the Circuit Court of the United States averring that he was the holder of a large amount of bonds and coupons, secured by mortgage executed by the appellant. He prayed for e
Deming's Appeal
Deming's Appeal. Motion to reinstate a supposed legal tender case denied on the ground chiefly of laches; notwithstanding consent of the other side, the United States. Latham and Denting being entitled, each of them, to recover a certain su
The Columbia
The Columbia. A steamer crossing another so as to involve risk of collision, condemned in a case of collision : 1st. ÍTor violation of the regulation, then existing, that when st.eamvessels were so crossing, the one which had the other on h
Hornsby v. United States
Hornsby et al. v. United States. 1. Grants of the public domain of Mexico, made by governors of the- department of California, were of three kinds: 1st, grants by specific boundaries, where the donee was entitled to the entire tract describ
Braun v. Sauerwein
Braun v. Sauerwein. 1. Although the running of a statute of limitations to the right of suing may be suspended by causes not mentioned in the statute itself, as, for example, by the fact that the plaintiff, without default of his own, has b
The Kalorama
Note. Soon after the preceding appeal was decided, two other appeals, both from the same court with it, and with facts which distinguished them little, if at all, from it in principle, were adjudged. They were The Kalorama, The Custer. 1. T
The Lulu
The Lulu. The Qrapeshot (9 Wallace, 129) affirmed on the second point adjudged therein (pp. 133-141); and the doctrine again declared, that in the case of a lien asserted against a vessel supplied or repaired in a foreign port, necessity fo
Railroad Co. v. Reeves
Railroad Company v. Reeves. 1-. When a common carrier shows that a loss was by some vis major, as by flood, he is excused without proving affirmatively that he was guilty of no negligence. , 2. The proof of such negligence, if the negligenc
Downham v. Alexandria Council
Downham et al. v. Alexandria Council. An ordinance of the city council of Alexandria imposed a license tax of two hundred dollars upon dealers in beer or ale by the cask which was not manufactured in that city, but'brought there for sale. T
Dean v. Nelson
Dean v. Nelson. X. A sale of stock in a company at its par value, the consideration to be paid out of the net receipts of earnings of the stock; received quarterly by the company, and a note given therefor, with the condition that the princ
Bank of the Republic v. Millard
Bank of the Republic v. Millard 1. The holder of a hank check cannot sue the hank for refusing payment in the absence of proof that it was accepted by the bank or charged against the drawer. 2. The fact that the check was properly drawn on
Feild v. Farrington
Feild v. Farrington. 1. In a suit between a consignor, and his factors, who had made advances on the consignment nearly equal to its value — the allegation of the consignor being non-compliance by the factors with his order to sell — the al
Clark v. Bousfield
Clark v. Bousfield. A claim for arranging an elastic bed for printing designs, is not a claim for a design under the eleventh section of the act of March 2d, 1861, entitled “ An act in addition to an act to promote the progress of the usefu
Wiggins v. Burkham
Wiggins et al v. Burkham. 1. An account rendered, and not objected to within a reasonable time, is to be regarded as admitted by the party charged, to be primCt facie correct. 2. If certain items in an account under such circumstances are o
Texas v. Chiles
Texas v. Chiles. Motion made on the foot of a decree against a'defendant to compel an account, when the decree, by its terms, limited the accounting to the date of service of process in the suit, denied, where the property for which the acc
Stimpson v. Woodman
Stimpson v. Woodman. Where a roller in a particular combination had been used before without designs on it,- and a roller with designs on it had also been used in another combination-, it was not a patentable invention to place designs on.
The Schools v. Risley
The Schools v. Risley. 1. Calls for the Mississippi Eiver in deeds or conveyances from one private individual to another .private individual for lots in'St. Louis do not give or create riparian rights in the grantees. ■ 2. The eastern bound
Texas v. Hardenberg
Texas v. Hardenberg. 1. Under a bill by a State praying that a defendant may be enjoined from asking payment of certain United States bonds belonging to it, unlawfully taken some time before from its treasury, and now redeemable, and, for s
Mahoney v. United States
Mahoney v. United States. The provision of the act of Congress ofMay-lst,-1810, fixing-a salary to . the consul at Algiers and assigning to him certain duties, treating that place as belonging to a Mohammedan power, ceased to be operative w
Boylan v. United States
Boylan v. United States. 1. Under the 96th section of the Excise Act of June 30th, 1864, exempting from a tax laid on sundry articles of dress by section 95, clothes manufactured of materials on which a duty had been paid, unless “the in-oi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.