Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1872 Cases
174 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ribon v. Railroad Companies
Ribon v. Railroad Companies. A. majority of the stockholders and creditors of a railroad company which had several mortgages on the road,"agreed to sell it for a price offered, and to divide the proceeds among all the stockholders and credi
Walker v. Henshaw
Walker v. Henshaw. 'Prior to the 9th of July, 1858, when, the President set apart the surplus of „ land which remained after the Shawnee Indians had obtained their complement under the treaty of the United States with them, ratified Novembe
United States v. Huckabee
United States, Lyon et al. v. Huckabee. 1, Where, under the Confiscation Act of August 6th, 1861, after a libel showing' a case Vithin the act, ah amended libel sots out a case which shows that there can be no confiscation under the act, bo
Huntington v. Texas
Huntington v. Texas. Texas v. Huntington. 1. Statement of the points adjudged in Texas v. White $ Chiles (7 Wallace, 700), and Texas v. Hardenberg (10 Id. 68). 2. The State of Texas provided in an act of December 16th, 1851, authorizing the
Burke v. Smith
Burke v. Smith. The laws of á State required that before being organized, all railroad companies should have a subscription to their stock of not less than $50,000. Certain persons did subscribe more than this (to wit, $148,750), with a pro
Insurance Co. v. Piaggio
Insurance Company v. Piaggio. 1. A. brought suit on, a policy on vessel and freight, for a total loss. Th¿ jury found the whole amount insured with interest and $5000 besides for damages, and judgment was entered accordingly. Held, that the
Taylor v. Taintor
Taylor v. Taintor, Treasurer. 1. ‘When tbe bail of a party arrested by order of a State court of one State on information for a crime, and released from custody under his own and his bail’s recognizance that he will appear at a day fixed an
McNitt v. Turner
McNitt v. Turner. 1. Under the statute of Illinois authorizing the sale of the real estate of. a decedent, and directing the executor or administrator to make out a petition to the county court “stating therein what real estate the said tes
Marqueze v. Bloom
Marqueze v. Bloom. A case brought here .as within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act dismissed ; neither the record nor the opinion of the Supreme Court, ■ which was in the records, showing any question before that court, except one rela
The Mary Eveline
The Mary Eveline. 1. Though a sailing vessel having the wind is pnm& facie bound to adopt such a course as will prevent collision with other sailing vessels not having it, it is still the duty of these last in an emergency to make their 1 c
Merrill v. Petty
Merrill v. Petty. An appeal on a libel in personam for a collision by the owners of a schooner against the owners of a sloop that had been sunk in the collision, dismissed; the decree having been for $1292.84, and, therefore, “not exceeding
Ripley v. Insurance Co.
Ripley v. Insurance Company. One took out an accident policy of insurance on his life while “ travelling by public or private conveyance.” Having performed a part of his journey by steamer, which brought him to a certain village, he walked
Cofield v. McClelland
Cofield v. McClelland. 1. A bill to compel a conveyance from a person to whom the probate judge of Arapahoe County, Colorado Territory (in which.county is situated. . Denver), had conveyed a lot in pursuance of the acts of Congress of May 2
Railroad Co. v. Manufacturing Co.
Railroad Company v. Manufacturing Company. When goods are delivered to a common carrier to be transported over his railroad to his depot in a place named,.and there to be delivered to a second line of conveyance for transportation further o
Walker v. Whitehead
Walker v. Whitehead. 1. The laws which exist at the time of the making a contract, and in the place where it is made and to be performed, enter into and make part of it. This embraces those laws alike which affect its validity, construction
Slawson v. United States
Slawson v. United States. Under the proviso to the first section of the Abandoned and Captured Property Act,-excluding from its benefits property which has ’ been used in waging or carrying bn war against the United States,” tbe Court of Cl
Buchanan v. Smith
Buchanan v. Smith. 1. A creditor has reasonable cause to believe his debtor “ insolvent ” in the sense of the Bankrupt Act, when such a state of facts is brought to his notice respecting the affairs and pecuniary condition of his debtor, as
Carpenter v. Longan
Carpenter v. Longan. 1. ' The assignment of a negotiable note before its maturity, raises the presumption of a want of notice of any defence to it; and this presumption stands till it is overcome by sufficient proof. 2. When a mortgage give
Insurance Co. v. Comstock
Insurance Company v. Comstock. 1. Where, under the 41st section of the Bankrupt Act of 1867, a trial hy jury is had in the District Court in a case of application for involuntary bankruptcy, and'exceptions are taken in the ordinary and prop
Dickinson v. Planters' Bank
Dickinson v. The Planters’ Bank. 1. Although under a stipulation in writing made by the parties to the suit, and filed with the clerk of the court, in pursuance of the act of March 3d, 1865, which gives to the finding of the court (which ma
Humphrey v. Pegues
Humphrey v. Pegues. An act of assembly of a State passed in 1851 to incorporate a railroad company chartered a corporation, but did not exempt its property from 'taxation. An act passed in 1855 to amend its charter did exempt it. 'In 1863 a
Peabody v. Stark
Peabody, Collector, v. Stark. 1. In the absence of a clear, common conviction on the part of all the members of the court as to the meaning of a direction relating to distillers in one of the internal revenue acts, the court — not holding s
Pierce v. Carskadon
Pierce et al. v. Carskadon. By a statute of West Virginia passed in September, 1863, where a judgment . was rendered against a non-resident in an action in which an attachment ,was issued, without personal service of a copy of such attachme
Davis v. Gray
Davis v. Gray. 1 In this case — where a person who had been appointed receiver of a railroad, to which a large grant of lands had been made by a State, was seeking to enjoin the officers of the State which had declared the lands forfeited,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.