Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1872 Cases
174 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Graham v. Norton
Graham v. Norton. Mandamus from the District Courts will not lie by an assignee in bankruptcy, representing sundry bankrupts, against the auditor of a State, to recover from the State, taxes long before paid into the State treasury, upon th
Tiffany v. Lucas
Tiffany v. Lucas. 1. A sale by a person in fact insolvent and made within six months of a bankruptcy subsequently decreed, is not necessarily and without regard to its character, void under the 35th section of the Bankrupt Act. 2. If it was
Railroad Co. v. Gladmon
Railroad Company v. Gladmon. 1. While in a suit by an adult against a street railway company for injuries done to him while he was crossing the track of the company, it is true that the absence of reasonable care and caution on his part wil
Montgomery v. United States
Montgomery v. United States. 1. B., a loyal citizen of the United States, at New Orleans, had heen, prior to the rebellion, agent of a planter, J., who during the rebellion was a rebel, in the rebel region and lines, within which his planta
Hall v. Jordan
Hall v. Jordan. On a bill to enforce a vendor’s lien, where the vendee set up that the deed which the complainant had given him was insufficiently stamped (which fact if true would under an act of Congress prevent its being used in evidence
Davenport City v. Dows
Davenport City v. Dows. The ordinances of municipal corporations laying taxes cannot be regarded as the revenue laws of the State from which they derive their power of laying taxes, within the meaning of the act of June 30th, 1870, which ma
Moses v. Mayor
Moses v. The Mayor. The rule redeclared, that a decree of the highest court of a State which, merely dissolving an injunction granted in an inferior court, leaves the whole case to be disposed of on its merits, is not a “ final decree,” and
Ex parte Roberts
Ex parte Roberts. The allowance of an appeal to this court by the Court of Claims, does not absolutely and of itself remove the cause from the jurisdiction of the latter court, so that no order revoking such allowance can bo made. On petiti
Pennywit v. Eaton
Pennywit v. Eaton. [On Merits.] Judgment affirmed with 10 per cent, damages in a case brought here in disregard of the law as already settled by precedents of the court. Error to the Supreme Court of Arkansas; the case being this: On the 3d
Pennywit v. Eaton
Pennywit v. Eaton. [On Motion.] The court refused to dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, a case brought here as within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, when they could see a Federal question raised under it, though raised somewhat obsc
Kimball v. West
Kimball v. West. 1. When a contract for sale of lands is fully executed by a conveyance with a covenant of warranty, and the payment of the purchase-money, the remedy for a defect of title is by an action on the covenant. 2. A party declini
Grand Chute v. Winegar
Grand Chute v. Winegar. [In Equity.] A municipal corporation, obligors in a bond, cannot ask relief in equity that the obligee be enjoined from proceeding at law, and that the bond be surrendered, when his bill alleges that the bond was iss
Grand Chute v. Winegar
Grand Chute v. Winegar. [At Law.] 1. On an issue of fact raised by a plea in abatement, where the defendant holds the affirmative of the issue, and where the evidence (introduced by the defendant himself) is all in favor of the plaintiff, p
United States v. Thomas
United States v. Thomas. 1. A collector or receiver of public money, under bond to keep it safely and pay it when required, is not bound to render the money at all events, but is excused if prevented from rendering it by the act of God ■ or
Fowler v. Rapley
Note. At the same time with the adjudication as to the tax in the preceding case was adjudged the validity of the tax in the cases of two other railroad companies, to wit: The Pittsburg, Fort Wayne, and Chicago; and the Delaware, Lackawanna
Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania
Case of the State Tax on Foreign-held Bonds. [Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania.] 1. The power of taxation of a State is limited to persons, property, and business within her jurisdiction. All taxation must relate to one of these subjects. 2
Reading Railroad v. Pennsylvania
State Tax on Railway Gross Receipts. [Reading Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania.] 1. A statute of a State imposing a tax upon the gross receipts of railroad companies is not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States, though the gros
Erie Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania
Note. At the same time with the preceding case was adjudged another, that of Erie Railway Company v. Pennsylvania. A case, like the preceding one, in error to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff in error, in the present case, w
Reading Railroad v. Pennsylvania
Case of the State Freight Tax. [Reading Railroad Company v. Pennsylvania.] 1. The transportation of freight, or of the subjects of commerce, is a constituent part of commerce itself. 2. A tax upon freight, transported from State to State, i
Oelrichs v. Spain
Oelrichs v. Spain. 1. In the jurisprudence of the United States, the objection that there is an adequate remedy at law raises a jurisdictional question, and may be enforced by the court sua sponte, though not raised by the pleadings, nor su
Salomons v. Graham
Salomons v. Graham. A State made a contract with a person whom it employed to work for it, to pay him so much money for his work; the money to be paid from time to time as the work went on.' The work was done. Payment was made part in money
Reybold v. United States
Reybold v. United States. The government chartered a vessel during the war of the rebellion; the owners agreeing to keep her “tight, stanch, strong, well-manned,” &c., and to bear the marine risks; the war risks to be borne by the governmen
Pelham v. Way
Pelham v. Way. When, under the act of July 17th, 1862, “ to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, .and for other purposes,” the libel and monition have been framed in such a
Railroad Co. v. Johnson
Railroad Company v. Johnson. The constitutionality of the acts of Congress of February 25th, 1862, and of subsequent acts in addition thereto, making certain notes of the United States a legal tender in payment of debts, reaffirmed. In erro
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.