Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1873 Cases
206 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lasere v. Rochereau
Lasere v. Rochereau. Judicial proceedings during the war of the rebellion, within lines of the Federal army, by a private person on a mortgage, ending in a judgment and sale of the mortgaged premises, against one who had been expelled by th
State v. Stoll
State v. Stoll. If the provisions of a special charter or a special authority derived from the legislature, can reasonably well consist with general legislation whose words are not absolutely harmonious with it, the two are to be deemed to
Moore v. Huntington
Moore v. Huntington. 1. The court reverses a decree where the court below affirmed a report of a master finding (on evidence not competent, and in the face of answers by surviving partners responsive to a bill) that the interest of a compla
Ray v. Smith
Ray v. Smith. 1. Although it may bo conceded that notice of demand and non-payment of a note need not be given to an indorser who has received funds from the maker, indisputably and only for tbe purpose of paying the note whenever presented
Reed v. Gardner
Reed v. Gardner. In passing upon the questions presented in a hill of exceptions this court will not look beyond the bill itself. The pleadings and the statements of the hill, the verdict and the judgment are the only matters that are prope
United States v. Henry
United States v. Henry. 1. An officer who shows that he received a commission from the proper source, and who serves and is recognized as such officer by his superiors until his regiment is mustered out, and who presented himself at the pro
Conway v. Stannard
Conway v. Stannard. Under the fifteenth section of the.a&t of July 18th, 1866 (14 Stat. at Large, 180), providing for the sale of, unclaimed perishable property, or property the expense of keeping which would reduce the proceeds of sale (as
Stitt v. Huidekopers
Stitt v. Huidekopers. 1. It is a rule of evidence that, ordinarily, a witness who testifies to an affirmative is entitled to credit in preference to one who testifies to a negative, because the latter may have forgotten what actually occurr
Railroad Co. v. Lockwood
Railroad Company v. Lockwood. 1. A common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. 2. It is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a
Humbird v. Jackson County
HUMBIRD v. JACKSON COUNTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 209. Argued April 9, 1873. Decided April 28, 1873. Olcott v, Supervisors, 16 Wall. 678, followed. Mr. M. H. Carpenter for
The Lucille
The Lucille. 1. A schooner approaching a steamer coming towards her on a parallel line, with the difference of half a point in the course of the two, tending to a convergence, does right when she keeps on her course ; and the steamer is hou
Portland Co. v. United States
Portland Company v. United States. A case dismissed, January 8th, 1873, because the counsel for the appellant did not file a brief in the form required by the amendment to the 21st rule, promulgated November 16th, 1872, and to be seen at la
Norton v. Jamison
NORTON v. JAMISON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 192. Submitted December 6, 1872. Decided January 13, 1873. Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 18 Wall. 129, followed. Mr. Miles Taylor for plaintiffs in error. Mr. D. G. Campbell
Jones v. Fritschle
JONES v. FRITSCHLE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 59. Argued November 22, 1872. Decided January 6, 1873. Dismissed because the amount in controversy does not give the court jurisdiction
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.