Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1876 Cases
224 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Bostwick
United States v. Bostwick. 1. In this case, no formal lease of the property was executed; but the court holds that the correspondence under which the United States entered into occupancy constituted a contract of letting for one year, with
Doyle v. Wisconsin
Doyle v. Wisconsin. Sect. 1007 of the Revised Statutes, which, as amended by the act of Feb. 18, 1875 (18 Stat. part 3, p. 316), provides that, where a writ of error may operate as a supersedeas, execution shall not issue until the expirati
Utley v. Donaldson
Utley v. Donaldson. 1. The telegraphic correspondence in this case, in relation to the sale and purchase of certain bonds, considered, and held to constitute a complete contract of sale upon the condition, or with an implied warranty, that
Humes v. Scruggs
Humes v. Scruggs. 1 A general replication denies every allegation in the answer of a defendant not responsive to the bill. Therefore, he must prove his -allegation of a decree in a former suit pleaded by way of estoppel. 2. A decree in a su
Ex parte Cutting
Ex parte Cutting. 1. To entitle a petitioner to a writ of mandamus to compel a circuit court to allow an appeal from its decree, he must show that he has a clear right to an appeal which has been refused him by that court. 2. Mandamus does
Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. Hopkins
Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company v. Hopkins. 1. In.Kansas, an order of a court in a proceeding in aid of execution directing a garnishee to pay to the judgment, creditor money which he owes to the judgment debtor is not a judgment, and
Pike v. Evans
Pike v. Evans. 1. Although, in Louisiana, informalities which occur in a sheriff’s proceeding under execution may, if taken advantage of in due time, be good grounu for annulling a sale made by him, yet, if he, being thereunto authorized, s
Hoadley v. San Francisco
Hoadley v. San Francisco. 1. Under the fifth section of the act of -March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 471), this court has -jurisdiction to review an order of a circuit court dismissing a cause, or remanding it to the State court from which it had be
Wheeler v. Sedgwick
Wheeler v. Sedgwick. An objection of tbe defendant that the evidence admitted in the court below tended to prove that he was not solely liable to the plaintiff for one of the items of the account sued upon, cannot be made for the first time
Kibbe v. Ditto
Kibbe v. Ditto et al. The act of the general assembly of Illinois, entitled “ An Act to protect married women in their separate property,” approved Feb. 21, 1861, repeals, by implication, so much of the saving clause of the Statute of Limit
Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works
Hervey et al. v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works. 1. The doctrine announced in Green v. Van Buslcirk, 6 Wall. 307, id. 139, — that the liability of property to be sold under legal process, issuing from the courts of the State where it is situ
Tameling v. United States Freehold & Emigration Co.
Tameling v. United States Freehold and Emigration Company. The action of Congress confirming a private land claim in New Mexico, as recommended for confirmation by the surveyor-general' of that Territory, is not subject to judicial review.
Bayne v. United States
Bayne et al., Trustees, v. United States. A party who obtains from a disbursing officer public moneys without right thereto, and with full knowledge that they are such, becomes indebted to the United States, within the meaning of thd- fifth
Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold & Silver Mining Co.
Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Company. 1. At the time of the passage of the Nevada Enabling Act, approved March 21, 1861 (13 Stat. 30), sections 16 and 36 in the several townships in Nevada had not been surveyed, nor had Congr
Donaldson v. Farwell
Donaldson, Assignee, v. Farwell et al. 1. Where a party, by fraudulently concealing his insolvency and his intent not to pay. for goods, induces the owner to sell them to him on credit, the vendor, if no innocent third party'has acquired an
United States v. Ferrary
United States v. Ferrary et al. 1. Where, pursuant to the tenth section of the act of July 20,1868 (15 Stat. 129), • a survey of a distillery and an estimate of its producing capacity is made, ’ and a copy thereof furnished the distiller, s
Board of Supervisors v. Lackawana Iron & Coal Co.
Board of Supervisors of Wood County v. Lackawana Iron and Coal Company. The acts of March 8,1867, c. 93, of March 3,1869,- c. 166, and of Peb. 17, 1871, of Wisconsin, under which certain bonds were issued to the Green Bay and Lake Pepin Rai
City of Winona v. Cowdrey
City of Winona v. Cowdrey. The contract between the city of AVinona and the Minnesota Railway Construc- ' tion Company, bearing date April 23, 1870, construed, and the rights of the respective parties thereto discussed. Error to the Circuit
Desmare v. United States
Desmare v. United States. 1. A domicile once existing continúes until another is acquired; and, where a change thereof is alleged, the burden of proof rests upon the party making the allegation. 2. A., whose domicile was, and continued duri
Badger v. United States ex rel. Bolles
Badger et al. v. United States ex rel. Bolles. A supervisor, town-clerk, or justice of the peace, although his resignation is tendered to and accepted by the proper, authority, continues in office, ánd is not relieved from his duties arid r
West Wisconsin Railway Co. v. Board of Supervisors
West Wisconsin Railway Company v. Board of Supervisors of Trempealeau County. The doctrine announced in Tucker v. Ferguson, 22 Wall. 627, — that an act of the legislature of á State, exempting property of a railroad company from taxation, i
Bond v. Moore
Bond et al. v. Moore. The order of the President of the United States of April 29,1865 (13 Stat. 776), removed, from that date, all restrictions upon commercial intercourse between Tennessee and New Orleans; and neither the rights nor the d
Mackie v. Story
Mackie et al. v. Story. 1. In Louisiana, a legacy to two persons, “ to be divided equally between them,” is a conjoint one. If but one of them survives the testator, he is entitled, by accretion, to the whole of the thing bequeathed. 2, Par
United States v. Thompson
United States v. Thompson et al. Judgments in the State Courts against the United States cannot be brought here for re-examination upon a writ df error, except in cases where the same relief would be afforded to private parties. . Error to
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.