Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1879 Cases
211 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Railway Co. v. Twombly
Railway Company v. Twombly. 1. Where a party moving for a new trial assigns as reasons therefor that tne verdict is not sustained by the evidence, and that the court erred in giving certain instructions and in refusing others, — Held, that,
Arthur v. Herold
Arthur v. Herold. In an action against a collector of customs, to recover duties alleged to have been wrongfully exacted upon chicory imported in 1873, it was not error for the court to charge the jury that ground chicory was the same thing
Holden v. Trust Co.
Holden v. Trust Company. 1. In the District of Columbia, the legal rate of interest is six per cent per annum, but parties may, in writing, stipulate for any other rate not exceed ing ten. 2. Where a party made there his promissory note, wh
Emigrant Co. v. County of Adams
Emigrant Company v. County of Adams. 1. Though the grant by the act of Congress of Sept. 28,1850 !(9 Stat. 519), of the swamp and overflowed lands to the States in which they lie, is declared tq be made for the exclusive purpose of enabling
Cowell v. Springs Co.
Cowell v. Springs Company. 1. A condition in a deed conveying land that intoxicating liquors shall never be manufactured, sold, or otherwise disposed of as a beverage in any place of public resort thereon, and that if this condition be brok
Fairfield v. County of Gallatin
Fairfield v. County of Gallatin. 1. Where no Federal question is involved, this court will follow the construction which has been uniformly given to the Constitution or the laws of a State by its highest court. 2. Cases affirming this princ
National Bank v. Insurance Co.
National Bank v. Insurance Company. Where the record has not been printed, a motion to dismiss an appeal or a writ. of error will not be considered where there is any question about the facts on which the motion rests. Motion to dismiss an
Mining Co. v. Taylor
Mining Company v. Taylor. 1. In ejectment for an undivided interest in a mining claim in Nevada, where both parties derive title from the original owner, the validity and regularity of his location are not in question. 2. Where the plaintif
United States v. Hirsch
United States v. Hirsch. 1. A period of less than five years will not bar a prosecution for effecting an entry of goods at the custom-house by a fraudulent invoice of them, and a false classification as to their quality and value. 2. A cons
Railroad Co. v. Fraloff
Railroad Company v. Fraloff. 1. It is competent for general carriers of passengers, by specific regulations, distinctly brought to the knowledge of the-passenger, which are reasonable, and not inconsistent with a statute or their duties to
Ex parte Reed
Ex parte Reed. 1. The regularly appointed clerk of a paymaster in the navy is a "person in the naval service of the United States,” within the meaning of art. 14, sect. 1624, of the Revised Statutes, and, for a violation of its provisions,
Soule v. United States
Soule v. United States. Debt on the bond of a collector of internal revenue, bearing date Jan. 12, 1867. Held, 1. That the audit of his accounts was the duty of the First Auditor. 2. That the settlement of them, as the same appears by the t
Garneau v. Dozier
Garneau v. Dozier. Por the purposes of an appeal to, or a writ of error from, this court, the tran script of the record is sufficiently authenticated, if it be sealed with the seal of the court below, and signed by the deputy clerk thereof
Tintsman v. National Bank
Tintsman v. National Bank. Where, by an agreed statement of facts in the nature of a special verdict, the plaintiff’s claim was admitted by the defendant,- except the sum of $3,134.20, — Held, that that sum was the amount actually in disput
Ex parte French
Ex parte French. In ejectment, where A., B., and the other defendants were respectively in the separate possession of specific parcels of the land, judgment was rendered against them for the recovery thereof and costs of suit, and i also ag
Jaeger v. Moore
JAEGER v. MOORE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 232. Argued April 15, 16, 1879. Decided May 5, 1879. On the facts, the decree below Is reversed in part, and in part affirmed. Mr. Enoch Totten and Mr. Linden K
Leavenworth v. Kinney
LEAVENWORTH v. KINNEY. EBBOB TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 744. Submitted January 10, 1870. Decided March 3 1879. Commissioners v. Sellno, 99 U. S. 624, followed. Mr. M. H. Carpenter for plaintiff
Williams v. United States
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 1058. Submitted January 24, 1879. Decided February 3, 1879. The acceptance by a supernumerary officer in the Continental line of an appointment in the regiment of guards author
Faxon v. Russell
FAXON v. RUSSELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 846. Submitted January 13, 1879. Decided January 20, 1879. Arthur v. Davies, 96 U. S. 135, followed. Arthur v. Bheims, 96 U. S. 113, ap
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.