Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1881 Cases
233 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pott v. Arthur
Pott v. Arthur. Books imported in August, 1874, were subject to a duty of twenty-five per cent ad valorem. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion of the cou
United States v. Savings Bank
United States v. Savings Bank. 1. The Court of Claims has jurisdiction of a suit brought against the United 'States to recover back certain' taxes and penallies alleged to be of the character mentioned in sects. 3220, 3228, Rev. Stat., wher
Printing House v. Trustees
Printing House v. Trustees. 1. A corporation was created in one State to promote a benevolent enterprise) and its charter provided that the presidents of institutions organized in other States of the Union to collect funds to aid it should
Savings Bank v. Archbold
Savings Bank v. Archbold. 1. The last clause of sect. 3408 of the Revised Statutes exempts savings hanks of the character there mentioned from taxation on so much of their deposits as they have invested in. securities of the United States,
Merritt v. Welsh
Merritt v. Welsh. A., in 1879, imported sugars to which an artificial color was not given after they had been manufactured. Held, that, under schedule G, sect; 2504, Rev. Stat,' the sole test of their dutiable quality was their actual color
Mason v. Sargent
Mason v. Sargent. A testator who died Dec. 4,1867, bequeathed certain personal property to trus-' tees, to be held by them in trust for Iris widow during her life, and on her death to his children. She died June 17,1872. Held, that a legacy
Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United States
Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railway Company v. United States. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railway Company. The provisions of the act of July 12,1876, c 179 (19 Stat. 78), touching a reduction of rates for railway
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. United States
Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. United States. 1. A railroad company, in aid of which Congress granted land, entered, September, 1875, into a contract with the United States to transport for four years the mails over its road at
Koshkonong v. Burton
Koshkonong v. Burton. 1. The Statute of Limitations of Wisconsin applies to the coupons of a municipal bond, whether they be detached from it or not, and begins to run from the time they respectively mature. 2. The legislature has the const
Union Pacific Railroad v. United States
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States. 1. The sixth section of the act of Congress of July 1, 1862, c. 120, incorporating tile Union Pacific Railroad Company (12 Stat. 489), constitutes a contract between the United States and the
St. Louis v. Knapp Co.
St. Louis v. Knapp Company. Where the city of St. Louis filed its bill to enjoin the defendant from completing on his premises within the city a work then in the course of construction, whereby the Mississippi River would be divided from it
Smelting Co. v. Kemp
Smelting Company v. Kemp. 1. A patent, duly signed, countersigned, and sealed, for public lands which, at the time it was issued, the Land Department had, under the statute,"'authority to convey cannot be collaterally impeached in an action
Hopt v. People
Hopt v. People. 1. Under a statute establishing degrees of the 'crime of murder, and providing that wilful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing shall be murder in the first degree, evidence that the accused was intoxicated at th
Moores v. National Bank
Moores v. National Bank. 1. The construction given by the Supreme Court of a State to a statute of limitations of the State will be followed by this court in a case decided the other way in the Circuit Court before the decision of the State
United States v. McBratney
United States v. McBratney. The Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado has no juris- • diction of an indictment against a white roan for the murder of a white man within the Ute Reservation in the State of Colorado.
Davis v. Fredericks
Davis v. Fredericks. The court affirms the decree below, dismissing the complainant’s bill, it appearing that the lands which he seeks to subject to the payment of his claim belong to the wife of his debtor, and that the purchase-money ther
Ex parte Rowland
Ex parte Rowland. 1. The 'county commissioners of a county in Alabama who were required by statute to levy and asséss such a special tax not exceeding one per cent upon the real and personal property as would be sufficient to meet the semia
Dugger v. Bocock
Dugger v. Bocock. Inasmuch as a Federal question is not involved in the determination of the case, 1 this court has no jurisdiction.to re-examine the decree of a State court dismissing a bill brought by the vendor, of lands in Alabama, who
Bonaparte v. Tax Court
Bonaparte v. Tax Court. The Constitution does not prohibit a State from including in the taxable property of her citizens so much of the registered public debt of another State ■ as they respectively hold, although the debtor State may exem
County of Clay v. Society for Savings
County of Clay v. Society for Savings. 1. The legislation of the State of Illinois reviewed, whereunder the county of Clay issued two series of bonds, one dated Nov. 1,1869, in payment of its subscription to the stock of the Illinois Southe
Ex parte Cockcroft
Ex parte Cockcroft. A person cannot appeal from a decree rendered in a suit whereto he was no* a party. Petition for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mr. William JE. Earle for the petitioner. There was n
Davis v. Friedlander
Davis v. Friedlander. ■1. The assignment made to assignees in bankruptcy in proceedings which were brought more than four months after attachments, issued in a chancery suit pending in a State court, were levied upon the property of the ban
Elwood v. Flannigan
Elwood v. Flannigan. 1. The United- States agreed.to grant to the chief of an Indian tribe two sections of land to be thereafter selected,-and - to convey them by patent. After they had been selected, he aliened them by deed, in fee,, with
Merrell v. Tice
Merrell v. Tice. 1. In an action for the infringement of liis copyright-of a book, the plaintiff cannot recover without proving that, wfthin ten days from the publication thereof, he delivered two copies of sucli copyright book at the offic
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.