Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1882 Cases
192 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mayer v. Walsh
MAYER and Another v. WALSH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Decided December 18th, 1882. Practice, In the absence of a printed record the court will not grant a motion to dismiss
In re Amendments to Rules 1 & 10
IN THE MATTER OF AMENDMENTS TO RULES 1 AND 10. November 26th, 1882. Review of the legislation' and practice of the court relating to taxation of the clerk’s fees for printed copies of records. Change in rules announced.
Feibelman v. Packard
FEIBELMAN v. PACKARD and Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Decided November 13th, 1882. Error — Practice. A writ of error sued out by one of two or more joint defendants without a summ
Gray v. Howe
GRAY v. HOWE and Another. APPEAL FEOM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TEERITORT OF UTAH. Decided November 13th, 1882. Practice. Where the supreme court of a Territory on appeal reverses the judgment of a district court and sets aside findings of f
Woolf v. Hamilton
WOOLF v. HAMILTON et al. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. Decided November 10th, 1882. Error — Practice—Statutes. A case not tried in a territorial cohrt by a jury eannot-be brought for review by a writ of error.
Bigelow v. Armes
BIGELOW v. ARMES. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. Decided November 6th, 1882. Equity — Specific Performance — Statute of Frauds. A proposed in writing to B to exchange A’s real estate for B’s real estate with a ca
Waples v. Hays
WAPLES v. HAYS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE LOUISIANA. Decided November 6th, 1882. Confiscation — Mortgage—Subrogation. 1. A mortgaged real estate in New Orleans to B. Proceedings being taken again
Crane Iron Co. v. Hoagland
CRANE IRON COMPANY v. HOAGLAND. WURTS and Others v. SAME. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Decided October 23d, 1882. Practice. Motions to dismiss with which are united motions to affirm, to strike out certain assig
Johnson v. Waters
JOHNSON and Another v. WATERS, Administrator. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Decided October 16th, 1882. Practice. It appearing that a personal decree for money could not be given, and tbe
Western Pacific Railroad v. United States
WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY & Another v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FKOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Practice — Public Lands. In a suit brought by a District Attorney of the United States to set as
The Nuestra Señora de Regla
THE NUESTRA SEÑORA DE REGLA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Appeal — Constitutional Law — Demurrage—Execution—Prize—Probable Cause — Supreme Court. The Nuestra Señora de Regla was
Medsker v. Bonebrake
MEDSKER and Wife v. BONEBRAKE, Assignee. APPEAL from' THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. bankruptcy — Equity—Fraudulent Conveyance — Husband and Wife— Practice. 1. Where a wife lends to her husband money whi
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Cushman
CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CUSHMAN and Another. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POB THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. Conflict of Laws — Constitutional Law — Contract—Interest—Mortgage—Redemption — Stat
Stebbins v. Duncan
STEBBINS v. DUNCAN and Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE ILLINOIS. Deed — Evidence—Record^ of Deeds. 1. Suggestion of the death of a plaintiff in the record, and an order to make his dev
Antoni v. Greenhow
Antoni v. Greenhow. 1. By issuing, pursuant to her “funding act” of March 30, 1871, her bonds with interest coupons thereto attached, the State of Virginia entered into a.valid contract with every holder of the coupons, whereby she bound he
Louisiana v. Jumel
Louisiana v. Jumel. Elliott v. Wiltz. 1. By force'of the act of the legislature of Louisiana, known as Act No. 3 of' 1874, and the constitutional amendment adopted in that year, which provided that bonds should be issued under that act in e
Transportation Co. v. Parkersburg
Transportation Company v. Parkersburg. 1. The city of Parkersburg built within its limits a wharf on the bank of the Ohio River, and prescribed by ordinance certain rates of wharfage on vessels “that may discharge or receive freight, or lan
Escanaba Co. v. Chicago
Escanaba Company v. Chicago. 1. The Chicago River and its branches, although lying within the limits of the State of Illinois, are navigable waters of the United States over which Congress, in the exercise of its power under the, commerce,
National Bank v. Stewart
National Bank of Xenia v. Stewart. At the time of borrowing money from a national bank, A. delivered to it, as collateral security for the debt thereby created, the certificate of his shares of its capital stock. On his failure to pay at th
United States v. Curtis
United States v. Curtis. An indictment for perjury against an officer of a national bank, for a wilfully false-declaration or statement in'a report made under sect. 6211 of the Revised Statutes is bad, if,, prior to the passage of the act o
United States v. Britton
United States v. Britton. 1. The counts of an indictment against the president of a national banking association for making such a false entry on its books as is punishable under sect. 5209 of the Revised Statutes are sufficient if they are
Slawson v. Grand Street Railroad
Slawson v. Grand Street Railroad Company. 1. It is the duty of the court to dismiss a suit brought to restrain the infringement of letters-patent, where the device or contrivance for which they were granted is not patentable, although such
Gage v. Herring
Gage v. Herring. 1. Where, within four months before their expiration, letters-patent, covering a single claim for a combination of several elements, are reissued and extended, with the same description as before, but containing in addition
Duff v. Sterling Pump Co.
Duff v. Sterling Pump Company. 1. Reissued letters-patent No. 6673, granted to Mrs. P. Duff, E. A. Kitzmiller, and R. P. Duff, Oct. 5, 1875, for an “improvement in wash-boards,” on the surrender of original letters-patent No. 111,585, grant
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.