Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1885 Cases
266 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Winchester & Partridge Manufacturing Co. v. Creary
WINCHESTER & PARTRIDGE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CREARY & Others. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Argued November 17, 18, 1885. Decided December 21, 1885. The declarations of a vendor of per
Burnett v. United States
BURNETT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted November 23, 1885. — Decided December 21, 1885. The pension which widows are entitled to receive under the provision of Rev. Stat. § 4703, is the pension for total disabil
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE PENDING IN THIS COURT ON APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Argued December 7, 1885. Decided December 21, 1885. There is nothing in Rev. Stat. § 5361, authorizing certa
McClure v. United States
McCLURE v. UNITED STATES. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE PENDING IN THIS COURT ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Argued December 8, 1885. — Decided December 21, 1885. An act of Congress specially referring to the Court of Claims a paymaster’s
Hewitt v. Filbert
HEWITT v. FILBERT & Another. APPEAL PROM T,HE SUPREME COURT OP THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted December 7, 1885. — Decided December 21, 1885. Except in cases of appeals allowed in open court during the term at which the decree appealed
San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
SAN MATEO COUNTY v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted December 17, 1885. — Decided December 21, 1885. The court hears a motion by counsel for plainti
Stewart v. Jefferson Police Jury
STEWART v. JEFFERSON POLICE JURY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ’ LOUISIANA. Submitted November 18, 1885. Decided December 21, 1885. The act of the legislature of Louisiana of 1872 prohibiting, with some éxcep-' tions, parish t
Fisk v. Jefferson Police Jury
FISK v. JEFFERSON POLICE JURY. LOUISIANA ex rel. FISK v. Same. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Submitted. November 18, 1885. Decided December 21, 1885. Where a law attaches a fixed compensation to a public office durin
Liverpool & London Insurance v. Gunther
LIVERPOOL & LONDON INSURANCE COMPANY v. GUNTHER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. • Argued November 12, 1886. — Decided December 21, 1885. A violation of any of the prohibitions in a poli
Coyle v. Davis
COYLE v. DAVIS & Another. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted December 4, 1885. Argued December 9, 1885. — Decided December 21, 1885. The grantor in an absolute deed of an undivided interest in land, in fee-
Lee v. Johnson
LEE v. JOHNSON. error to the circuit court oe emmet county, state oe MICHIGAN. Argued December 4, 1885. — Decided December 21, 1885. One seeking in equity to have the holder of a patent of public land declared a trustee for his benefit on t
United States v. Mooney
UNITED STATES v. MOONEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued November 25, 1885. Decided December 14, 1885. The exclusive jurisdiction conferred upon District Courts of the United States,
Call v. Palmer
CALL v. PALMER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. Argued November 18, 1885. Decided December 14, 1885. When an agent, who is authorized by his principal to lend money.for lawful interest, exacts fo
Roberts v. Reilly
ROBERTS v. REILLY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Argued November 20, 1883. — Decided December 14, 1885. Appeals- in cases of habeas corpus from the final decision of a District Cour
Cannon v. United States
CANNON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP -THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. Argued November 20, 23, 1885. — Decided December 14, 1885. The offence of cohabiting with more than one woman, created by § 3 of the act of Congress of March 22,
Mackall v. Richards
MACKALL v. RICHARDS & Another. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted December 8, 1885. — Decided December 14, 1885. An appeal -will not be entertained by this court from a decree entered in a Circuit or other
United States v. Price
UNITED STATES v. PRICE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Submitted November 23, 1885. Decided December 14, 1885. When an act of Congress directs the Secretary of the Treasury to pay
Holgate v. Eaton
HOLGATE & Another v. EATON. APPEAL FROM THE OIROUVT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued November 24, 25, 1885. Decided December 14, 1885. A married woman who, on being informed of a contract made by her husb
Utah & Northern Railway v. Fisher
UTAH & NORTHERN RAILWAY v. FISHER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY' OF IDAHO. Submitted October 21, 1885. — Decided December 14, 1885. The Fort Hill Indian reservation in the County of Oneida, in the Territory of Idaho, is no
Miller v. Foree
MILLER & Others v. FOREE & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Argued November 2, 1885. Decided December 14, 1885. The application of an old process or machine to a similar or analogous
Saxonville Mills v. Russell
SAXONVILLE MILLS v. RUSSELL, Collector. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued December 4, 1885. Decided December 14, 1885. The proviso in § 7 of the act of March 3, 1865, 13 Stat. 491, 494
Marvel v. Merritt
MARVEL v. MERRITT, Collector. error to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued November 23, 1885. — Decided December 14, 1885. Iron ore is subject to the duty of twenty per centum ad valorem impo
Bridgewater Iron Co. v. Lissberger
BRIDGEWATER IRON COMPANY v. LISSBERGER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued December 3, 4, 1885. — Decided December 14, 1885. A transfer for valuable consideration of shares in a Massach
Hanley v. Donoghue
HANLEY & Another v. DONOGHUE. EBBOR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. Argued November 18, 19, 1885. — Decided December 14, 1885. Under art. 4, seo. 1, of the Constitution, and § 905 of the Revised Statutes, a judgment recove
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.