Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1886 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad v. Dennis
VICKSBURG, SHREVEPORT & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. DENNIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE LOUISIANA. Argued January 20, 1886. Decided March 1, 1886. A provision in a charter granted by a State to a railroad'company, by which' “
Preston v. Manard
PRESTON v. MANARD & Another. APPEAL EKOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR '. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE ILLINOIS. Submitted January 6, 1886. — Decided March 1, 1886. A hose-reel, mounted upon a wheeled carriage, supporting a fountai
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. HERBERT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. Argued December 4, 8, 9, 1885. — Decided February 1, 1886. When the allowance of a challenge to a juror for cause is assigned as error, it
Boyd v. United States
BOYD v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued December 11, 14, 1885. Decided February 1, 1886. The 5th section of the act of June 32, 1874, entitled “ An Act to amend th
Jones v. Simpson
JONES & Another v. SIMPSON. SAME v. HOISINGTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Submitted December 10, 1885. — Decided February 1, 1886. A sale of -personal property made by the. vendor with inten
Liebke v. Thomas
LIEBKE & Another v. THOMAS. ERROR TO THE ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS IN THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Submitted January 8, 1886. — Decided February 1, 1886. Notice given to the holder and owner of an accommodation note, under § 17 of the act of Jun
Ming v. Woolfolk
MING & Another v. WOOLFOLK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME OOURT OF THE TERRITORY .OF MONTANA. Submitted January 15, 1886. Decided February 1, 1886. In order to maintain an action for deceit, it is not only necessary to establish the telling of an un
Shepard v. Carrigan
SHEPARD & Others v. CARRIGAN. APPEAL EKOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued January, 86. Decided February 1, 1886. When an applicant for a patent is compelled by the rejection of his applicatio
Hartog v. Memory
HARTOG v. MEMORY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted December 4, 1885. Decided February 1, 1886. When the jurisdiction of a Circuit Court of the United States over the parties by
Sands v. Edmunds
SANDS v. EDMUNDS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. Argued January 7, 8, 1886. — Decided February 1, 1886. After lawful tender to the proper State officer of the requisite amount of coupons (receivable by the t
Royall v. Virginia
ROYALL v. VIRGINIA. ERROR to the supreme court of appeals of the state of VIRGINIA. Argued January 7, 8, 1886. Decided February 1, 1886. An assessment made by a statute of Virginia a condition precedent to obtaining a license for pursuing a
Chaffin v. Taylor
CHAFFIN v. TAYLOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. Argued January 7, 8, 1886__ Decided February 1, 1886. At the former hearing of this ease, Chaffin v. Taylor, 114 U. S. 309, every question 'of law was decide
Barry v. Edmunds
BARRY v. EDMUNDS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Argued January 7, 8, 1886. — Decided February 1, 1886. A suit cannot properly be dismissed by a Circuit Court of the United States as no
Otis v. Oregon Steamship Co.
OTIS v. OREGON STEAMSHIP COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORE. Submitted January 25, 1886. — Decided February 1, 1886. If a record shows on its face that a Federal question was not necessarily involved in the deci
Tyre & Spring Works Co. v. Spalding
TYRE & SPRING WORKS COMPANY v. SPALDING. error to the circuit- court of the united states for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted January 8, 1886. Decided February 1, 1886. Under these provisions as.to duties on imports, in Schedul
Central Railroad v. Bourbon County
CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOURBON COUNTY. ORIGINAL MOTION in A CAUSE PENDING IN ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. Submitted January 25, 1886. — Decided February 1, 1886. Cases in which the execution of a State revenue law has bee
Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Cheesman
IRON SILVER MINING COMPANY v. CHEESMAN & Another. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. Argued December 18, 21, 1885. Decided January 25, 1886. The act of Congress, § 2322 Revised Statutes, gives to t
Coe v. Errol
COE v. ERROL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Submitted October 13, 1885. Decided January 25, 1886. Goods and chattels within a State are equally taxable whether owned by a citizen of the State, or a citizen of ano
Oberteuffer v. Robertson
OBERTEUFFER & Another v. ROBERTSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued January 6, 7, 1886. Decided January 25, 1886. Under section 7 of the act of March 3, 1883, 22 Stat. 523, the c
Dunphy v. Ryan
DUNPHY v. RYAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF. MONTANA. Argued January 15, 1886. Decided January 25, 1886. An agreement, on the' part of A to acquire title in his own name to a tract of land upon the best terms possible, an
Laughlin v. District of Columbia
LAUGHLIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL FROM THE COUET OF CLAIMS. Argued January 14, 1886. — Decided January 25, 1886. A, having done work on the streets of Washington under a contract with the board of public works,.received certificates
United States v. Perkins
UNITED STATES v. PERKINS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted January 6, 1886. — Decided January 25, 1886. When Congress by law, vests the appointment of inferior officers in the heads of departments, it may limit and restrict the po
United States v. Redgrave
UNITED STATES v. REDGRAVE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted January 6, 1886. — Decided January 25, 1886. Cadet-engineers who had finished their four years’ course at the Naval Academy, had passed their final academic examinations,
London Assurance Co. v. Drennen
LONDON ASSURANCE COMPANY v. DRENNEN & Others. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Submitted January 6, 1886. Decided January 18, 1886. An agreement by A. with B. that, on the payment of a sum of mo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.