Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1887 Cases
300 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Madison
NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. MADISON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued November 11, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. If the jury return a verdict for the plainti
Le Sassier v. Kennedy
LE SASSIER v. KENNEDY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Argued November 7, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. A sold to B shares in a national bank, and signed a transfer on the books of the company, leaving the name of th
Benites v. Hampton
BENITES v. HAMPTON. Error to The Supreme Court of The Territory of Utah. Submitted November 8, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. There being no assignment of errors in the transcript annexed to the writ of error, no specification of errors in
Spraul v. Louisiana
SPRAUL v. LOUISIANA. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CAUSE BROUGHT UP BY WRIT OF ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. Submitted November 21, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. A supersedeas obtained by a plaintiff in error under the provisions of Rev
In re Ayers
IN RE AYERS. IN RE SCOTT. IN RE McCABE. ORIGINAL. Argued November 14, 15, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. !«■ is well settled in this court that, while the exercise of the power of punishment for contempt of their orders by courts of genera
Smith v. Craft
SMITH v. CRAFT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Argued November 4, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. Whether an agreement to prefer a bona fide creditor is so fraudulent against other creditors,
Jewell v. Knight
JEWELL v. KNIGHT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOF THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Argued November 3, 4, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. Questions certified to this court upon a division of opinion of two judges in the Circui
White v. Barber
WHITE v. BARBER. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued November 17, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. A bona fide contract for the actual sale of grain, deliverable -within
Lamaster v. Keeler
LAMASTER v. KEELER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Argued November 18, 1887. Decided December 5, 1887. The provisions of Rev. Stat. § 914 relating to the practice, pleadings, and forms and mode
Doolan v. Carr
DOOLAN v. CARR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE’ DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 34. Argued October 24, 25, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. Tbe proper Circuit Court of tbe United States has jurisdiction, irrespective of
Cox v. Western Land & Cattle Co.
COX v. WESTERN LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted November 16, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. It appearing that the amount in controversy does not exce
In re Henry
IN RE HENRY. ORIGINAL. Submitted November 10, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. Each letter or packet put in or taken out from the post-office of the United ■ States iii violation of the provisions of llcv. Stat. § 5180 constitutes a separat
Mustin v. Cadwalader
MUSTIN v. CADWALADER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Submitted November 3, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. 'Under § 2930 of the Revised . Statutes, the merchant appraiser must he a
Oelbermann v. Merritt
OELBERMANN v. MERRITT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued November 3, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. Under § 2930 of the Revised Statutes, the merchant appraiser must be a person
Walker v. Dun
THE MAGGIE J. SMITH. WALKER v. DUN. APPEALS FROM TOE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR FOR DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Argued November 10, 11, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. The findings of fact in a cause in admiralty under the act of Feb
United States v. Morant
UNITED STATES v. MORANT. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Argued October 25, 26, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. The testimonio granted to Cerilo de Morant, September 22,1817, was fu
Dewey v. West Fairmont Gas Coal Co.
DEWEY v. WEST FAIRMONT GAS COAL COMPANY. WEST FAIRMONT GAS COAL COMPANY v. DEWEY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. Submitted November 9, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. A New'York corpo
Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United States
COLORADO COAL AND IRON COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. Argued November 2, 1887. Decided November 21, 1887. To a bill in equity to cancel a patent of land from the Un
Shreveport v. Holmes
SHREVEPORT v. HOLMES. SHREVEPORT v. CROOKS. SHREVEPORT v. CARTER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE •WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 1121, 1122, 1123. Submitted October 17, 1887. Decided November 14, 1887. Rehearin
Hitz v. Jenks
HITZ v. JENKS. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued October 21, 1887. Decided November 14, 1887. Real estate in the District of Columbia, belonging to a mar -ied woman before the act of April 10,1
Sands v. Manistee River Improvement Co.
SANDS v. MANISTEE RIVER IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Argued October 31, 1887. Decided November 14, 1887. The exaction of tolls, under a state statute, for the use of an improved natural waterway
Wilkinson v. Nebraska ex rel. Cleveland Society for Savings
WILKINSON v. NEBRASKA, ex rel. CLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted November 1, 1887. Decided November 14, 1887. The proviso in § 6 of the act of March 3, 188
Siemens's Administrator v. Sellers
SIEMENS’S ADMINISTRATOR v. SELLERS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued October 17, 1887. Decided November 14, 1887. The English letters-patent dated January 22, 18G1, and seal
Andrews v. Hovey
ANDREWS v. HOVEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. Argued October 18, 19, 1887. Decided November 14, 1887. Reissued letters-patent No. 4372, granted to Nelson W. Green, May 9th, 1871, ' f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.