Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1888 Cases
293 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Southern Telegraph Co.
EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. SOUTHERN TELEGRAPH COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 107. Submitted December 13, 1887. Argued March 20, 1888. Decided Ap
Dewolf v. Hays
DeWOLF v. HAYS APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OB* THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 868. Submitted January 6, 1888. Decided April 9, 1888. Upon t^e proofs in this case the court finds that the settlement which the bill se
Hartranft v. Oliver
HARTRANFT v. OLIVER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 190. Argued March 22, 1888. Decided April 9, 1888. A vessel arrived at a port ol the United States from a foreign port on the
Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. James
YALE LOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. JAMES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 162. Argued February 3, 6, 1888. Decided April 9, 1888. A patent granted in 1871, for an improvement in
Union Trust Co. v. Morrison
UNION TRUST COMPANY v. MORRISON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 64. Argued and submitted November 10, 1887. Decided April 2, 1888. The entire rolling stock of a railway company
Washington Ice Co. v. Webster
WASHINGTON ICE CO. v. WEBSTER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE. No. 150. Argued January 30, 31, 1888. Decided April 2, 1888. In Maine, the plaintiff in a replevin suit for ice, gave a bond, with sur
Williams v. Conger
WILLIAMS v. CONGER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 105. Argued December 16, 19, 20, 1887. Decided April 2, 1888. If the removal of a public record from its place of deposit is not pro
Spencer v. Merchant
SPENCER v. MERCHANT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 872. Submitted February 7, 1888. Decided April 2, 1888. A judgment of the highest court of a State, sustaining the validity of an assessment upon lands under a st
Missouri ex rel. Walker v. Walker
MISSOURI, ex rel. WALKER v. WALKER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 910. Submitted February 15, 1888. Decided April 2, 1888. A contract, made under authority of a statute, by a State with an individual to prosecute
Hartranft v. Sheppard
HARTRANFT v. SHEPPARD. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. ' No. 191. Argued and submitted February 17, 1888. Decided April 2, 1888. Quilts composed of cotton and eider-down, or silk an
Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Co.
THE TELEPHONE CASES. DOLBEAR v. AMERICAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. MOLECULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY v. AMERICAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. AMERICAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. MOLECULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY. CLAY COMMERCIAL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. AMERICAN B
Bowerman v. Rogers
BOWERMAN v. ROGERS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 187. Argued February 16, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. From the evidence in this case it is clear that the assignor of the defend
Bucher v. Cheshire Railroad
BUCHER v. CHESHIRE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 132. Argued January 11, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. The plaintiff sued the defendants in a state court and recover
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Attorney General of Commonwealth
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1325. Argued February 15, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888.
Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
BOWMAN v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES ROR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OR ILLINOIS. No. 798. Submitted January 10, 1887. Decided March 19, 1888. The question whether, when Congress fail
Wall v. Bissell
WALL v. BISSELL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 22. Argued April 12, 13,1887. Decided March 19, 1888. It seems, that under the statutes of Indiana an executor named in a will, who has nev
Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad
SAGE v. MEMPHIS AND LITTLE ROCK RAILROAD COMPANY. MEMPHIS AND LITTLE ROCK RAILROAD COMPANY v. SAGE. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Nos. 126, 127. Argued January 6, 9, 1888. Decided
Clement v. Packer
CLEMENT v. PACKER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT' OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 143. Argued January 23, 24, 1888, Decided March 19, 1888. An assignment, as error, that the court below rejected certain paten
United States v. San Jacinto Tin Co.
UNITED STATES v. SAN JACINTO TIN COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 887. Argued January 26, 27, 30, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. A suit maybe brought by the United'States in any
Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Missouri River Packet Co.
HANNIBAL AND ST. JOSEPH RAILROAD COMPANY v. MISSOURI RIVER PACKET COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 163. Argued and Submitted February 6, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. The act of Congress of July 25,1866, 14
Southern Development Co. v. Silva
SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. SILVA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT' OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1210. Submitted January 9, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. The general rule that when the answer of the de
Origet v. United States
ORIGET v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 186. Argued February 16,1888. Decided March 19, 1888. A paper heacled “Bill of.Exceptions” not bearing the signature of the
Friedenstein v. United States
FRIEDENSTEIN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 178. Argued February 10, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. In a suit in rent against certain diamonds seized as forfeited
Hoskin v. Fisher
HOSKIN v. FISHER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.' No. 169. Argaed February 7, 1888. Decided March 19, 1888. Claims 2 and 3 of reissued letters patent No. 8876,'granted to Frank H. Fisher
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.