Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1894 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wharton v. Wise
WHARTON v. WISE. APPEAL EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1054. Argued March 5, 6, 1894. Decided April 23, 1894. The compact of March 28, 1785, between the States of Virginia and Maryland,
The Britannia
THE BRITANNIA (1). THE BRITANNIA (2). THE BEACONSFIELD. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 340, 341, and 342. Argued April 3, 4, 1894. Decided April 23, 1894. In entering the port
Morgan v. Daniels
MORGAN v. DANIELS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OE MASSACHUSETTS. No. 313. Argued March 21, 22, 1894. Decided April 23, 1894. When a question between contending parties, as to priority of invention, is
Hegler v. Faulkner
HEGLER v. FAULKNER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 166. Submitted December 13, 1893. Decided April 23, 1894. A report of the names of Indians and half-breeds entitled to participate in an a
Lutz v. Magone
LUTZ v. MAGONE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 336. Argued April 3, 1894. — Decided April 23, 1894. Saccharine, imported into the United States in 1887, was not entitled to free en
United States v. Klingenberg
UNITED STATES v. KLINGENBERG. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1066. Submitted March 26, 1894. Decided April 23, 1894. The action of a collector of customs under § 2 of the act of
Baer v. Moran Bros.
BAER v. MORAN BROTHERS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 683. Argued April 18, 19, 1894. —Decided April 20,1894. 'This court cannot take judicial notice of the' nature and extent of tide lands or mud flats.
Gourko v. United States
GOURKO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP ARKANSAS. No. 972. Submitted November 17, 1893 Decided April 16, 1894. A person who has an angry altercation with another person, such as t
United States v. Shields
UNITED STATES v. SHIELDS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 1130. Submitted March 26, 1894. — Decided April 16, 1894. A District Attorney, whose place of abode is at a distance from the place at which court is held, is not entitled to mi
West v. Cabell
WEST v. CABELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 258. Submitted February 2, 1894. Decided April 16, 1894. A warrant of. a commissioner of a Circuit Court of the United States, commandin
The Martello
THE MARTELLO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 293. Argued March 15, 16, 1894. — Decided April 16, 1894. A steamship, entering or leaving the port of New York in a fog through whi
United States v. Pridgeon
UNITED STATES v. PRIDGEON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE. UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 1070. Submitted March 13, 1894. Decided April 16, 1894. On November 12, .1890, In the Indian country, within the boundaries o
Wilson v. Haley Live Stock Co.
WILSON v. HALEY LIVE STOCK COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 332. Submitted March 30, 1894. — Decided April 16, 1894. A defendant who proceeds to introduce testimony, after denial of
Spalding v. Castro
SPALDING v. CASTRO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE • NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 297. Submitted March 19, 1894. — Decided April 16, 1894. Seeberger v. Castro, ante, 32, followed. A ruling by the court below,
Seeberger v. Castro
SEEBERGER v. CASTRO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 296. Submitted March 19, 1894.- — Decided April 16, 1894. The purchaser of an imported article in bond, pending an appeal from t
Lowndes v. Huntington
LOWNDES v. HUNTINGTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 117. Argued December 18, 19, 1893. — Decided April 16, 1894. The grant to the town of Huntington, made by the Governor General
Schoenfeld v. Hendricks
SCHOENFELD v. HENDRICKS. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1067. Submitted March 6,1894. Decided April 16, 1894. An action cannot be maintained against a collector of customs, either
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Daniels
UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DANIELS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 165. Argued and submitted March 13, 1894. Decided April 16, 1894. When a defendant, after the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, moves to dis
Worthington v. Boston
WORTHINGTON v. BOSTON. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 312. Argued March 20, 21, 1894. Decided April 9, 1894. The Mayor and City Council of Boston had authority, in 1885, to authorize t
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Booth
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOOTH. EEEOB TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE' DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 327. Submitted March 28, 1894. Decided April 9, 1894. The verdict and judgment in the court below having been fo
Burck v. Taylor
BURCK v. TAYLOR. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 170. Argued December 15, 1893. Decided April 9, 1894. S. contracted with the State of Texas, in writing, January 18,1882, to build a
Saltonstall v. Russell
SALTONSTALL v. RUSSELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE • DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 314. Submitted March 22,1894. Decided April 9, 1894. By the submission of a case to the judgment of the Circuit Court upon an a
Bogle v. Magone
BOGLE v. MAGONE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 291. Argued March 15,1894. Decided April 9, 1894. Anchovy paste and bloater, paste, made of anchovies or bloaters ground up fine and
North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.
NORTH CHICAGO ROLLING MILL COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS ORE AND STEEL COMPANY. APPEAR PROM THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR' THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 197. Argued January 11,1894. Decided April 9, 1894. A garnishee, who occu
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.