Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1896 Cases
250 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Central Pacific Railroad v. United States
CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 46. Argued and submitted October 21, 1896. Decided November 9, 1896. For several years in succession before the commencementof this action the Central P
Parsons v. Venzke
PARSONS v. VENZKE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF RICHLAND COUNTY, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 264. Submitted October 13, 1896. Decided November 2, 1896. The action of local land officers on charges of fraud in the final proof of a preemptio
United States v. McMahon
UNITED STATES v. McMAHON. McMAHON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 356, 357. Argued October 21, 1896. Decided November 2, 1896. The fees to -which a marshal is entitled, under Rev. Stat. §
McElroy v. United States
McELROY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO ■ THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 402. Submitted October 13, 1896. Decided November 2, 1896. G., B., H., C., S. and J. were indicted April 16 for assault w
Saltonstall v. Birtwell
SALTONSTALL v. BIRTWELL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued April 24, 27, 1896. Decided October 26, 1896. In 1888, when the goods were imported to recover back the duties paid upon which this a
United States v. Kurtz
UNITED STATES v. KURTZ. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 530. Submitted October 13, 1896. Decided October 26, 1896. A clerk of a Circuit Court who is directed by the court to keep a criminal final record book, in which are to be recorde
United States v. Hewecker
UNITED STATES v. HEWECKER. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 547. Submitted October 13, 1896. Decided October 26, 1896. Sections 651 and 697 of tlie Revised Statutes, relating to certificates of d
United States v. Gilliat
UNITED STATES v. GILLIAT. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 535. Submitted October 13, 1896. Decided October 26, 1896. It was the intention of Congress, by the language used in the act of August 23, 1894, c. 307, 28 Stat. 424, 487, to re
American Road Machine Co. v. Pennock & Sharp Co.
AMERICAN ROAD MACHINE COMPANY v. PENNOCK AND SHARP COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 27. Argued March 30, 31, 1896. Decided October 19, 1896. Letters patent No. 331,920
Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. Garland
BEAR LAKE AND RIVER WATER WORKS AND IRRIGATION COMPANY v. GARLAND et al. APPEAL EBOM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ITT ATT. No. 48. Argued May 6, 1896. Decided October 19, 1896. On the 16th of August, 1889, a statute was In force in
United States v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
United States v. Union Pacific Railway Company. United States v. St. Paul and Sioux City Railroad Company, Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 319, No. 322, argued December 1, 2, 1896. argued with No. 321, N
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Simmons
No. 118. Missouri Pacific Railway Company v. Simmons, Mr. David D. Duncan, Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Winslow F. Pierce for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. M. Williams for' defendant in error. Administrator of Campbell,
United States v. Ball
UNITED STATES v. BALL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES ROE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OR TEXAS. No. 461. Argued March 25, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. A general verdict of acquittal, in a court having jurisdiction of the canse and
Wiborg v. United States
WIBORG v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 986. Submitted May 18, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. The several acts described iu and made punishable by Rev. Stat. § 528
United States v. Perkins
UNITED STATES v. PERKINS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HEW TORE. No. 422. Submitted May 8, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. Personal property, bequeathed by will to the United States, is subject to an inheritance tax under state la
Brown v. Wygant & Leeds
BROWN v. WYGANT AND LEEDS. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 209. Submitted April 2, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. R. obtained a judgment against B. on the law side of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia
Lucas v. United States
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 692. Submitted November 19, 1895. Decided May 25, 1896. On the trial of a Choctaw Indian for the murder of a negro at the Choc
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
Union Pacific Railway Company v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company. Union Pacific Railway Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company. Nos. 41, 42. Argued April 21, 22, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. Mr. John F. D
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOE THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No
Ward v. Race Horse
WARD v. RACE HORSE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COUET OP THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING-. No. 841. Argued March 11, 12, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. The provision in the treaty of February 24,1869, with the Bannock Indians, whose
United States v. Allen
UNITED STATES v. ALLEN. CERTIOBABI TO TEE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 887. Submitted May 8, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. The right to a drawback on bituminous coal, imported into the United States and consumed as fuel
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Cook
MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. COOK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 178. Argued and submitted March 24, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. By the filing of the map of the line surveyed prior to December 24,18
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. James
UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. JAMES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 270. Argued May 4, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. The plaintiff, an employé of the railway company, sued to recover for injuries caused t
Grayson v. Lynch
GRAYSON v. LYNCH. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. No. 290. Argued May 4, 5, 1896. Decided May 25, 1896. When the assignments of error are very numerous, it is practically found necessary to consider but a few o
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.